This is what I could find out so far
Bavz I found the following 408 & 409 = Wellington Ia
Here: https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/141318-aircraft-part-numbe…
“These were followed by 187 Mk IAs with Nash and Thompson turrets and strengthened landing gear with larger main wheels. Except for 17 Chester-built aircraft, all were manufactured at Weybddge.”
“Type 408 Wellington Mk IA: production version (187 built) with Pegasus XVIII engines, Nash & Thompson turrets and ‘dustbin’”
One question I have is does anyone have any photos or illustrations of Wimpys with the underside matching the colour on the found panel? As all I’ve found is the usual Black, Yellow or coastal command White.
I could only find 2 examples via IMW both from 24 squadron with a colour potentially matching the found panel. But those appear to be Wellington C.Mk XV’s which were converted 1a’s:
“Wellington C.Mk XV: service conversions of Wellington Mk lAs as transports for 18 troops.”
“The transports had their turrets removed and faired over, the bomb bay being sealed up as well, with seats for 18 passengers, and a passenger door fitted on the right. Early conversions of Wellington B.IA bombers became “Wellington Cargo Mark IA (C.IA)” transports, with later conversions being “Wellington C.XV” transports; while conversions of Wellington Mark IC bombers became “Wellington C.XVI” transports. There was also a single B.IA conversion as a “C.IX”, though details are not clear. A photo survives of a C.XVI with fake guns fore and aft, protruding from “turrets” that were painted on — how convincing this was, and if it ever did any good, is unclear.”
Does anyone know how many were converted to Wellington C Mk XV?
FarlamAirframes thanks for the identification, I had just been reading a part number reference topic on here when your reply was posted.
Would I be correct in thinking it would be ID’d as a Wellington Ia due to the 408 part number prefix?
My thought is that it could be pre late 40’s due to the diagonal/V structures potentially indicating this could be pre standardised semi monocoque design which went with the now standard practice of horizontal stringers & vertical farmers.
It reminded me of the Wellington design/structure.
The profile of the main structure is curved not flat the panel has been flattened slightly at some point in its life causing some of the formers to kink in on themselves on the skin face. The photos tend to flatten the appearance of the structure also.
2
Some photos of the panel washed and dry to try and show the exterior paint colour which seems to be a single colour that being Grey
Hello all, apologies for the delay in updating this thread the house has taken priority up to now.
I’ve managed to start cleaning up 2 smaller parts that came away from the main panel when removing it from the ground due to the rivets failing through corrosion.
1st part seems to read:
40816-33D
Z in a circle
LB Ltd 12 in another circle
2nd part seems to read:
26516 1?31 CE3
4th photo
3rd photo
2nd photo
This is a post from about the same topic that I started on another site, which gives some more info.
“Don’t panic! This does NOT affect the Ramsey 1940s Weekend, which is held on the main airfield site. That has already been sold off and is owned by Tom Vaughn of Turbine Motor Works. Given the money he has spent on renovating the hangers and offices he isn’t planning on moving anywhere yet!
The redundant barrack blocks, messes and other admin buildings may yet be sold off, but this doesn’t affect the TMW site.
The “agricultural land” which is basically the area where the runways used to be, was leased back in 1991, with a “claw-back” clause so the MOD retained ownership. This is now being sold off, and is outside the TMW site.
Three of the four former married quarter estates are already private housing – one estate is now called Fairmead Park and has been private since 1998. Our first house was one of these. So not sure which MQ estates this is talking about, unless they mean Valient Square, which is up the road from the airfield and is currently occupied by the USAF.
The Ramsey 1940s Weekend is already scheduled to go ahead on Sat 16th and Sun 17th August 2008 at the former RAF Upwood. More details to follow.”
From how I read paragraph 6 it sound as if its for Traders.
If Mods feel it nessesary to remove please do.
I thought I’d post this on this thread as it wasn’t mentioned on the old thread. I was told this by a very good friend who was part of the restoration team for the B25 at Duxford at the time of filming of Hanover Street.
The film company asked if they could borrow it to film the interior shots for the film, DX said yes and the 25 was moved to wherever for filming. On return to DX the 25 was in a rough state because of the size of the camera equipment the film company had taken a chainsaw to the fuselage and cut it in two. So the camera could sit between both sections a film the action. To remedy the surgery the film company pushed the 2 parts back together and put a strap of metal over the join and bolted it together and returned it to DX. To say DX and the resto team were unhappy is probably an understatement, and to top it off I don’t think DX got and compensation for the damage done.
Tyler.
The Wright Flyer, then other A/C to numerous to list.