dark light

Dinger

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airborne Laser Completes Laser Ground Tests #2601213
    Dinger
    Participant

    Who cares? Nobody else plays by the rules, it’s time we took the gloves off and brought equality to the playing field.

    At this stage, the gloves isn’t the problem. The U.S. already has plenty of ways to kill people. Problem is, first you got to figure out which people are terrorists and which people aren’t. That’s not a problem that’s going to be solved by shooting lasers at people.

    in reply to: v-22 #2603714
    Dinger
    Participant

    Is comparing it to the Harrier confidence inspiring? Besides the USMC Harriers’ relatively high accident rate, there’s a difference between a fatal accident in a fighter with a crew of one or two versus one in a transport with 20+ guys riding around in it.

    in reply to: U.S. ban on Venezuela aircraft purchases. #2603722
    Dinger
    Participant

    Shipment of Venezuelan crude to China is a bigger problem. It would require either a very large fleet of small, uneconomical PANAMAX sized tankers or a pipeline across Columbia.

    This is from an op-ed in Petroleum, so I can’t vouch for the source, but it indicates that Chavez wants to diversify his customer base:

    The recent gas pipeline agreement between Venezuela and Colombia is the latest step in an effort by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to better integrate South America. The pipeline deal was signed by Chavez and Colombian President Alvaro Uribe on November 24, 2005. The agreement puts onto paper the decision to construct a two-way gas pipeline between Colombia and Venezuela.

    The pipeline agreement is the beginning of a larger project that will bring crude oil from Venezuela to the Pacific Ocean, where it will then be transported to Asia.

    ….

    In the past, Chavez sparked concern in the United States when he announced that he would like to see more of Venezuela’s oil exports go to China. Venezuela, for instance, increased 2005 oil exports to China by five times the 2004 amount, amounting to 70,000 barrels of oil per day; Chavez has stated that he wants this number to hit 300,000 barrels per day by the end of 2006. Currently, about 50 percent of Venezuela’s oil exports go to the United States.

    http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rTg2FvDCt1QJ:www.petroleumworld.com/Lag120505.htm+venezuelan+oil+exports&hl=en&client=firefox-a

    in reply to: Potus helo is called now "VH-71A" #2611158
    Dinger
    Participant

    Merlin would have made a lot of sense. It’s not like we used a different name for the Harrier.

    in reply to: Potus helo is called now "VH-71A" #2611215
    Dinger
    Participant

    Rumors in press have come up with the name “Kestrel”, which doesn’t make much sense given that a kestrel is a small falcon and the EH101 is a fairly big helicopter. Maybe they went with it for the kestrel’s awesome hovering ability. And they do have them in England and Europe, which makes them appropriate for an imported design.

    I would have liked to have seen “Kingfisher.” Or maybe the “Marsh Tit”.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2618003
    Dinger
    Participant

    The CT-4ยดs are leased or RNZAF property?

    Leased.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2618743
    Dinger
    Participant

    well the point is, sure there is no way we could beat off the US, but we’re gonna give them a bloddy knuckle so they could think twice before attacking

    The force imbalance indicates that the Canadians would have a tough time getting equipment into the air, let alone rapping knuckles. More likely to do damage with commando missions across the border. Who in the states can tell the difference between Canadians and Americans any more? We have enough regional accents that the canucks could just say they’re from upstate New York without anyone noticing anything strange.

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2618858
    Dinger
    Participant

    Just face it: any enemy that can bring an offensive force all the way to New Zealand which the RNZAF has to fight, is an enemy way stronger than New Zealand can afford fighting.

    Depends on the force. The real issue is that nobody in New Zealand can figure out why another country would want to hit them with an air strike, so they shrug at the idea of fighters.

    It’s interesting to compare them with Canada. Military enthusiasts north of the border seem to want new fighters even though their position in the world makes it unlikely anyone but the U.S. would attack them.

    in reply to: Singapore retires its Super Skyhawks #2625433
    Dinger
    Participant

    So how many Skyhawk variants will be left flying in the RSAF until 2007?

    in reply to: Vought Kingfisher II flying boat UAV concept #2627291
    Dinger
    Participant

    Can’t see why the Navy would want a unmanned seaplane instead of a VTOL craft when they already go with manned helicopters over manned seaplanes. The Navy doesn’t even seem that thrilled with UAVs.

    What’s the wave height limit that seaplanes usually operate under?

    in reply to: Another £11 B to Be Poured into Eurofighter Project #2629882
    Dinger
    Participant

    Don’t the Turks license build the F-16? AFAIK that includes the engines and at least a subset of the avionics. That should make the country more sanctions proof than most other customers for US hardware.

    True, they did license build F-16s, but I think the engines for those airplanes were made in the U.S. So they’d probably in a better position than someplace like Thailand, but it would probably still be a pain in the butt.

    Dinger
    Participant

    Please send me the money for the 3 CT7-8E each. ๐Ÿ˜€ ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Okay, but the terms are ‘cash on delivery.’ Will they be coming via UPS ground?

    in reply to: Another £11 B to Be Poured into Eurofighter Project #2630297
    Dinger
    Participant

    I don’t think Rumsfield’s recent remarks will make Turkey go toward EU, instead i think its to make Turkey feel responsible for Iraqi complications (not that you have to accept that)

    Neither do the Turks.

    And I wouldn’t say that the eurofighter doesn’t come with any strings attached, but the Euros don’t seem as interested in maintaining hegemony and their foreign policy seems somewhat more consistent over the long term. Imagine being a government who’s supported by the U.S. in one year, then condemned as the worst threat to world peace since Hitler in the next. The embargo follows and you’re soon left with a lot of worthless iron.

    Both the U.S. and EU are capable of such behavior, but if I was in another country and had to choose between them on the risk of capricious decisions I’d pick the EU every time.

    Dinger
    Participant

    Seems to me, that the US-taxpayer is still the winner from that contest.

    Just not as much as they would have been if the S-92 had been chosen. We’re just building somebody else’s copter under license and putting our own avionics into it. Some of the money stays here, some goes overseas.

    in reply to: Another £11 B to Be Poured into Eurofighter Project #2630859
    Dinger
    Participant

    Turkey ordered the A400 and flies aircraft from Eurocopter. American influence is strong, but the way Rummy’s been talking about them lately and the EU thing, a purchase of eurofighters doesn’t seem out of the question.

    Part of the problem with waiting on JSF is that you have to rely on the U.S. congress and Air Force continuing with the program over the next few years, and to succeed in keeping costs contained. Eurofighter is the bird in the hand.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 224 total)