My pleasure to help.
Test
I would say it was a test, given the presence of registration marks on the intake.
The Tu-22 had the longest career, it was even exported to Iraq and Libya. I think the Hustler and the Vulcan were more revolutionary in their designs. Russian, back then, tended to be simpler and more hardy as a result. Even though I like the B-58, I would go with the Blinder.
Cost
I would say the biggest advantage the Gripen has over the F-16 and F/A-18 is cost. The legacy Hornet is no longer in production, so any acquisitions made there would have to be all second-hand. The Super Hornet is not in the same class of fighter as the Gripen. With the F/A-18E/F, one is doubling-up on almost everything vs. the Gripen. I do think a mixed Gripen/Super Hornet force would be very capable.
Age is the next advantage over the F-16 and F/A-18. The Gripen is a younger design (1987 FF.) than that of its Western competitors. The Gripen entered Swedish service before the Super Hornet entered USN service, however. The E-model Gripens will offer more advanced technology than can be found in late-model Block 52 F-16’s.
There is nothing on the Angel’s web-site to indicate any cancellations. The Thunderbirds have the bad news, in bold, on their front page.
What will the Thunderbirds be doing on their time off?
Can we cut the Obama 2013 world tour?
What is that white line coming out from under the wing?
Sad
Wow. I guess air shows in the U.S. will become a thing of the past.
Two
Perhaps I can stop the arguing for a moment with a question relating to earlier MiG-29 variants…
I’m glad someone posted that photo of the Luftwafe MiG-29 with the R-27 because it got me wondering……how many R-27’s can the earlier MiG-29’s (Fulcrum-A, Fulcrum-C) carry?
Is two on the inboard pylons the limit or is it possible to carry four on the inboard and middle underwing pylons? Are the full complement of R-27 models supported? (i.e. R-27R, R-27T, R-27ER, R-27ET?)
Look forward to any answers. Thanks!
I have only ever seen the MiG-29 carrying two R-27s, one SARH, the other IR guided. The remaining pylons being used for R-60 or R-73 carriage.
FBW
Modern fly-by-wire systems would prevent flying at operational limits. There is no way for the pilot to “Overfly” the aircraft. I think modern engines are much better than their predecessors. Also, modern airframes are lighter and stronger through the use of composites.
Maybe the guy already tried a google search and then tried to post here to see if he could get more original pictures.
Nic
OP did not indicate a Google search in the initial post.
That is actually an ejection handle, from a Martin-Baker AU11A or similar.
The seat looks as if it is bolted to the airframe without any type of rail system.
LOL

I’ll believe it when I see it in the air. However, I wouldn’t discount Iranian capability. They have been able to keep the Tomcats in the air after decades of embargo.