dark light

Freehand

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 951 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2308847
    Freehand
    Participant

    Too close

    The aircraft bears a striking resemblance to the F-22. Too much so for coincidence, IMHO.

    in reply to: Brimstone #2309521
    Freehand
    Participant
    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2309741
    Freehand
    Participant

    Majority of the images are in the public domain. Be sure of that and you’ll be fine.

    in reply to: F-15 vs. Su-27 #2309899
    Freehand
    Participant

    This is key. I’ve personally been had by aircraft that are inferior to my own on paper, simply out of lack of experience, or poor gamesmanship. I’ve also gunned the brains out an F-15C when he decided to throw the E-M diagrams into the wind, and try something new. It all comes down to the man in the box, and how well he/she knows their aircraft and that of their adversary. I’d be willing to bet my next paycheck that an F-86 or MIG-17 flown properly, could gun the face off of a Flanker, Eagle, or Raptor flown improperly.

    Then, inferior MiG-17’s were scoring kills against missile-armed F-4’s in Vietnam. It is not impossible for older, legacy types to get the best of a newer system.

    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2310016
    Freehand
    Participant

    Once could make their own?

    Handy with Photoshop, Illustrator, or even the GIMP? Wikipedia has free SVG/PNG files of each nation’s roundel. Put them together, publish…

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Roundel_of_the_USAF.svg/200px-Roundel_of_the_USAF.svg.pnghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/RCAF-Roundel.svg/200px-RCAF-Roundel.svg.pnghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/Mexican_Air_Force_roundel.svg/200px-Mexican_Air_Force_roundel.svg.png

    in reply to: F-15 vs. Su-27 #2310018
    Freehand
    Participant

    Other pilots evaluate the Eagle’s maneuvering capabilities as more analogous to MiG-23MLD.”

    Laughable

    Sometimes an order can be streched a little bit, when all participants kept their mouth. Just near the end of your term in the AF the “flying desk” is worth it. Fighter pilots have to be agressive to be successful.

    RADAR tapes don’t lie.

    Both aircraft are great in their own regards. Any outcome is going to be strongly dependent on whom is in the cockpit. Especially with two aircraft so close in design and performance.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2311373
    Freehand
    Participant

    Race to the bottom?

    I think, in design implementation, there comes a point where a common set of criteria will produce a common result. Requirements like stealth, high-speed, and enhanced situational awareness (i.e. good visibility) will bring everyone to the same conclusions. Throw in the “if it works for them, it will work for us” principle and very liberal practices around research gathering, some similarity is almost a given.

    Just a thought…

    Freehand
    Participant

    Su-35 vs. J-10

    Which is better? One way to find out. My $$$ is on the Su-35.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2314652
    Freehand
    Participant

    Su-33

    Su-33 resting for the evening.

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to85000/084537.jpg

    Freehand
    Participant

    Splitting Hairs

    Technicaly it isn’t russian, but chinese:D

    1Saludo

    The Chinese didn’t exactly design the F-6. The Russians even had to help the Chinese set up and start the assembly line before acceptable examples starting being produced.

    in reply to: Portugal may dispose of some/all F-16's? #2316630
    Freehand
    Participant

    Usable?

    F-35 is initially going to replace 40-45 year old F-16s with 20-25 year old avionics. The Turks have some newer F-16s, but they’ll probably keep & continue to upgrade them, not sell them second hand. They’ll retire the F-4 & older, worn-out F-16s.

    I don’t see a glut of used F-16s flooding the market & bringing prices down in the future. Romania has already been offered ex-USAF F-16s free (for the aircraft: it would have to pay for all the other things needed to bring them into service), but decided it couldn’t afford them at the moment. How are F-16s going to get cheaper than that?

    Could it be that the FAP airframes would be cheaper because they are already airworthy. Romania would have to apply their national insignia after pilot training and ground crew instruction to operate the ex-FAP F-16’s. Taking old USAF example and overhauling them is a bigger deal and expense.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2316705
    Freehand
    Participant

    Jug

    Some folks may debate the niceness of the photo, but I like it. I am also the author.

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8028/7190626938_be6092e245_b.jpg

    Freehand
    Participant

    Still lethal

    It looks like CGI because it is CGI.

    I like the pic with the Tomcat chasing the Bear. Interesting load of 1 Phoenix, 1 Sparrow and I assume 1 Sidewinder, but no tanks.

    One of each still makes the tomcat a very lethal kitty.

    Freehand
    Participant

    CGI

    The F-15 & MiG-23 almost looks-like a CGI image. The MiG-23’s ventral fin is not extended, for example.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2325893
    Freehand
    Participant

    RNlAF F-35A

    Big aircraft for a small air force.

    http://www.airfighters.com/photo_104504.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 951 total)