dark light

Freehand

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 951 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2360843
    Freehand
    Participant

    Chinese Industry

    I’m not a fan of the AT-6. Granted it will still be an American made product. In reality it is a European design with American systems grafted on it. I would have rather seen something more homegrown especially if they are recycling the T-6 designation for it. And if they are using a foreign design, why use the PC-9?

    Not really. Chinese investment groups have been buying up dying industries from western countries. These companies don’t have a market and are actually a poor investment. The sale of said company includes small private planes and small luxury jets. It is good news for the US competition IMHO because the ones that buy these planes will look only to Hawker to appease Chinese investors and shop for the top planes where they can find them. And that is not in China.

    I’ll never be crazy about foreign ownership of domestic industry. That’s me. The same goes for how I felt about the acquisition of Hummer.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2361124
    Freehand
    Participant

    Sad

    And the Chinese have bought Hawker Beechcraft for $1.9 billion.
    Hawker Beechcraft Agrees To Offer From Chinese Company

    Really sad.

    in reply to: China awaits fighter export breakthrough #2361442
    Freehand
    Participant

    South America

    I can see a potential operator for the JF-17 in Argentina, perhaps even Ecuador and Peru. This would all hinge on economic factors. The FAE’s Cheetah fighters might have another ten years left. The same could be said for the FAP MiG-29’s. FAA Mirages and A-4AR’s could be replaced at any time.

    in reply to: Fictional Foreign operators #2286533
    Freehand
    Participant

    U.S. Army C-27J

    Not so fictional

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA—Army/Alenia-C-27J-Spartan/2044950/L/&sid=a5acc054abc146894771b0ab26310c1d

    I would have like to see Austria or someone still fly the Viggen. I recall an article where a few Austrian pilots were sent to sweden to train on the then, more advanced, Viggen. Finland could have been a good contender for the Viggen as well.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2286994
    Freehand
    Participant

    Y-8GX4

    A nice close-up of China’s ELINT Y-8 derivative

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-R0Vct18q1VE/T_YIRM5SLJI/AAAAAAAALN4/srVRrAKoInk/s1600/CHINA+Y-8GX4+ELINT+MORRO.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2287573
    Freehand
    Participant

    Mexican Shrikes

    Rarely seen, if even still in use, Shrike Commanders from Mexico

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Mexico—Air/Rockwell-500S-Shrike/2128741/L/&sid=9b8bad87eaa4fbedfdc1cd9e222835b1

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2287689
    Freehand
    Participant

    Maybe the ground crew filled the aft tanks before the forward tanks, result = tail sitter.

    in reply to: A fresh look at aircraft camo schemes- #2287809
    Freehand
    Participant

    Maybe the differences are for quick visual recognition? Azure/Blue = Russian aircraft, Grey = NATO. This wouldn’t hold for the MiG-29’s Russia has flying nowadays, though. Dark Grey = F-15E, B-1B, B-2A. Light Grey = Tu-22M, Tu-95. Then there is the full-color marks Russia uses as opposed to the USAF/NATO.

    in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2287988
    Freehand
    Participant

    RIP

    RIP to the two Turkisk pilots

    Freehand
    Participant

    No engine?

    Doesn’t even look as if the MiG has an engine. The exhaust on a MiG-23 extends to be level with the trailing edge of the rudder. Doesn’t look like the case here.

    in reply to: A fresh look at aircraft camo schemes- #2288450
    Freehand
    Participant

    ASG

    As much as I do not like the boring grey color schemes on NATO aircraft, they are probably the best. I have never seen an Su-27, or MiG with the azure c/s against a real sky, so I cannot comment on that scheme’s effectiveness. I am for full-color markings. USAF/USN aircraft devote more attention to squadron markings and badges, whilst hiding the national marking (F-15, F/A-18, F-22 to a certain extent). It can go without saying that if one were to encounter an F-22, the owner is understood as no one else but the USAF flys the F-22. The color schemes on USN/USMC aircraft from the 1970’s are my favorite. Just my opinion…

    in reply to: Fictional Foreign operators #2288454
    Freehand
    Participant

    A-4

    McDonnell Douglas pitched the A-4 to both Switzerland and India (Navy). It would have been nice to see that. Perhaps someone with Ps skills can conjure that up. My skill with Ps is not so good.

    My attempt at portraying a FAR F-16C is attached

    in reply to: Any new pic's of the WZ-10 #2288674
    Freehand
    Participant

    Resin Kit

    For the adventurous modeler

    http://www.anigrand.com/AA2103_WZ-10.htm

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2289185
    Freehand
    Participant

    Not sure

    what to think about this ? :

    http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?airlinesearch=Syria%20-%20Air%20Force&aircraft_genericsearch=Sukhoi+Su-7&distinct_entry=true

    wishing you to you all , Dear Colleagues, a fine & sunny week-end,

    Etienne

    The tail has the present-day Syrian flag, but if the date is correct, the Egyptian-style flag would have been used. I also never heard of Syria operating the Su-7, while Egypt was a big user of the type. Egypt used the United Arab Republic flag until 1971, after Syria had withdrawn from the union. The modern Syrian flag and the UAR flag are identical.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #15 #2289269
    Freehand
    Participant

    Winner

    I think that one wins a prize.

    Now HERE’S a really unusual one- an S-55 from Brunei! I will try to track down a better image of that fuselage roundel.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 951 total)