dark light

Freehand

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 951 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is the best looking smiley chin-intake fighter? #2172080
    Freehand
    Participant

    IMHO F-16, then F-8 Crusader.

    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2203084
    Freehand
    Participant

    that is always a possibility. I also found one from the other side:

    http://i62.tinypic.com/312tgte.jpg
    a different number and paint job!!

    My guess is that a PSed roundel would not be a low vis one but a normal one.

    edit;found more pics

    http://www.romania-insider.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/F16-fighters-Romania-1.jpghttp://www.romania-insider.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/F16-fighters-Romania-3.jpg

    I’m the one who photoshopped 212…

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2139762
    Freehand
    Participant

    Y-8 would be very good for Thailand

    Y?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2145788
    Freehand
    Participant

    What’s the P-3 carrying? Mines?

    in reply to: dedicated CAS planes dead? #2150018
    Freehand
    Participant

    They’re probably more effective, except where cost is concerned. However, if high-flying, precision-guided strikes are more survivable than low-flying CAS aircraft, there’s a cost benefit there as well.

    in reply to: what's your favorite aircraft by type? #2154748
    Freehand
    Participant

    I like all kinds of aircraft. When I was a kid, it was the F-16. The movie “Iron Eagle” was, and probably still is, one of my favorites. Now, I like the former-Soviet Cold War era fighters like the MiG-21 and the MiG-29. They’re not as good as their Western counterparts, but they did the job, and when in the hands of a skilled pilot, were dangerous.

    Freehand
    Participant

    I think it still depends on the person in the cockpit, and whomever sees the other first. F-15 is old, but one hell of an air defense fighter. That would be my mount of choice.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2177576
    Freehand
    Participant

    US approves Beechcraft T-6C Texan-II sale to Argentina

    Interesting. I’d figure them for Super Tucano operators.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2202585
    Freehand
    Participant

    Japan is not going to buy the PAK-FA (T-50). They have the F-35A on order and they’re working on the F-3. Even though the F-3 is a test aircraft, it could easily evolve into a production type.

    Freehand
    Participant

    The Su-33 is capable of STOBAR operations. No Eagle variant can do anything similar.

    What about the Super Hornet? It may not exactly match the Su-33 in size, but it is certainly not the lighter F/A-18A/C.

    in reply to: Mig-21bis in VVS service #2204257
    Freehand
    Participant

    The MiG-21bis could be configured to carry a dual R-60 launch setup on the outer stations with a K-13 on the inboard stations with the usual tank on the centerline station. The MiG-21bis was much cheaper to operate for former-Eastern-bloc countries until better options or requirements for NATO compatibility became apparent. Aerostar and IAI had upgrade programs for the MiG-21 in the 90s, but they never really took off aside from the Lancers in Romania. MiG came out with the MiG-21-93 which evolved into the Bison for India, which turned out to be a nice upgrade.

    in reply to: What will Germany replace The Tornado with? #2204265
    Freehand
    Participant

    I think the Typhoons will be stretched as far as possible. They’re relatively new, and very capable compared to what the Russians will field in the next ten years. I don’t see every fulcrum and flanker being replaced by the T-50 within that time span. Additional, newer, capability can be added with nEUROn, or maybe even Gripen E if a low-cost, manned solution is required.

    Freehand
    Participant

    The post(Freehand@)

    What made no sense about it?

    Freehand
    Participant

    Without really getting into an us vs. them debate, the West doesn’t seem to need a “Flanker-sized” aircraft. It already has one, the F-15. The F-15 is 9′ shorter than the Su-27, 6′ shorter in the wings, and 1′ shorter in height. The F-15C can carry a heavier combat load than the Su-27 by almost 1,000lbs. The eagle also has a higher max. takeoff weight too. The Su-34 is too dedicated to the air-to-ground role. It has a similar combat radius to the F-15E. They both can carry their own weight in stores, but the F-15E has an advantage, the bubble canopy. I’m not sure if anyone here has ever sat in an F-15, I have (and I don’t fit – too tall), but one doesn’t sit in the aircraft, they sit on it. Visibility in all directions is great from the F-15’s cockpit. The Su-34 crew has very little option to see behind them. In a turning dogfight, you need to see behind you. F/A-18E/Fs recently intercepted Russian Su-34s in the Syrian area of battle, eschewing the very real possibility of an engagement occurring. IMHO, the F/A-18E/F, a very underrated aircraft, would have had no problems dealing with the Fullback.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2193374
    Freehand
    Participant

    won’t happen. strong pro-israel lobby in US politics. significant segment of Americans who believe it is their religious duty to prevent the fall of Israel.

    I know. I just don’t get it.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 951 total)