There were two
It looks as if there are two digital blue flankers in Ukrainian service.
Gripen FTW
I think the Gripen is a superior aircraft as well, but that is opinion. I do not think the JF-17 is a bad design. The export potential for the JF-17 is massive in replacing the fleets of MiG-21s world-wide.
Ukraine ≠ Russia. So?
A beautiful selection of tomcats.
Digital Flanker
It’s out and about.
http://spotters.net.ua/file/?id=62854&size=large
Not bad, but grey would be better.
Apathy
Not sounding apathetic, but what can the American public do? Even if they were able to voice their displeasure it is not like those in power listen. I do understand this is not a political thread.
Sorry JB, completely disagree.
This is a turf war and nothing less. There should be USAF top brass and certain members of the US congress/senate up on charges for this.
If I was the relative of any infantryman killed in action for reasons which could be traced back to inadequate supply, I would be seeking to bring criminal charges against the individuals within the USAF/congress/senate that were involved in this decision.
How can the US public accept the following course of events:
1. US Army request need for ‘last tactical mile’ transport back in 2005. Program called Future Cargo Aircraft.
2. USAF want on board, so in 2006 program renamed Joint Cargo Aircraft and a common airframe is specified. The Army were to lead the joint program office.
3. In 2007, moves were afoot to bring the whole fleet under the control of the USAF.
4. In early 2008, USAF reports emerge saying they will have little actual use for the JCA.
5. In late 2008, the US Army are no longer going to receive the JCA and the cut order will go entirely to the USAF.
6. In 2009, the USAF says not to worry, they’ll get the aircraft out and fulfill the role the Army needs.
7. 2012 – JCA cut altogether and the Army left with nothing.
Agree
I’d say that the pure presence of a pitot tube on the radome clearly indicates there is no AESA radar installed there, at all…. but feel free to believe this BS if you want.
I just fail to see why this deserves an entirely new thread..
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=112357&page=1
How many J-20 threads are there?
I’ll wait
Digi-29 does look good, but I’ll wait to see the UkAF Su-27 out of the paint shop.
Some awsome pics.
Mi-24V and Ka-52.http://englishrussia.com/2012/04/24/practice-flights-of-combat-helicopters-in-chernigovka/
Hats on the flightline? A no-no when I was in the service.
Hmmm, apart from the relocated air data probe, #2002 also has the front main landing gear door closed with the gear extended.
Glad they kept the gear door closed for taxiis. One decent bump and it looked as if the door would strike.
Meteor
My only RAF model, which will of course change in due course.

Photoshop
:confused:This is the first time i see a mig-29 picture shot in China.
At first glance i thought it was a PS job because the PLAAF sign on the tail seemed unnature and kind of ugly, but then i saw the environment and vegetation fits northern China. Can you guys see the white paint at the lower parts of the tree trunk ? That’s how we protect trees from insects in China.Or could that plane be borrowed or exchanged from DPRK for study ? and that can explained the psed PLAAF sign, cause the numbers painted on the intake confused me otherwise, i never saw a chinses plane using that kind of number font. It’s like DPRK or old Russian style.
[btw, i am a first timer on this forum, and say hi to everyone 😀 ]
This picture has been altered. That is a Romanian Air Force MiG-29.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/228/1336117fm4.jpg/sr=1
Didn’t they do this already, when evaluating the Gripen? It shouldn’t be that much of a surprise.
GAF K-8’s
Practicing for an aerial display