dark light

Freehand

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 951 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2311248
    Freehand
    Participant

    That’s a wingtip from another Su-30MKM, where the photo was taken. The four vanes on the nose are some kind of antennae. Similar configurations have been seen on Slovak MiG-29’s.

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Slovakia—Air/Mikoyan-Gurevich-MiG-29AS-(9-12AS)/2009576/L/&sid=01b54a19e5e7d1be092f71f847efc015

    Best c/s of any fighter in the sky, btw

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2311254
    Freehand
    Participant

    looks like Uganda scheme

    Looks like USAF SE Asia c/s. Perhaps they are unpaid Ugandan machines that were resold?

    Freehand
    Participant

    I still don’t get the point of placing the ship in the river. What are the advantages outside on invading West London? A show of force?

    in reply to: is J-8I influenced by Ye-152? #2311372
    Freehand
    Participant

    Not en masse and they certainly never exported them. Only a handful of big-nose MiG-21s were made in China. The F-7 and derivatives took the roles that would have been for the MiG-21MF/bis copies (F-7III).

    in reply to: is J-8I influenced by Ye-152? #2311388
    Freehand
    Participant

    It is possible the two different design teams reached similar, if not the same, conclusion. I think Chinese intel got a look at the Ye-152. The similarities are too great. With exception to the nose, the aircraft are almost identical. The smaller F-13-style nose dominates Chinese versions of the MiG-21.

    in reply to: Why is Dhruv an export success but Z-11 not? #2311823
    Freehand
    Participant

    not a question of comparable helicopters, its a question of ability to export.
    obviously Dhruv is a big boy like the J-10 of helicopters, and Z-11 is the Tejas of helicopters.

    I am sure france can export the originals to Argentina. It would not be the first time they sold military hardware down there. Z-11 is probably cheaper and or subsidized on credit, like the Mi-171 purchases.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #14 #2312212
    Freehand
    Participant

    I am more than willing to help that guy with placing watermarks on his photos.

    in reply to: North Korean MiG-23/29/Su-7s – any photos? #2312217
    Freehand
    Participant

    I figure the aircraft would stick right against the blue/grey sky. More so than the RoKAF F-15K’s. I don’t like grey c/s with toned-down markings, but they are effective. I can only figure the green is to help hide the aircraft on the ground.

    in reply to: North Korean MiG-23/29/Su-7s – any photos? #2312414
    Freehand
    Participant

    …and the MiG-23 is not even that good a warplane. Below is a shot of number Un and the boys (good quality).

    http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/kju020112/k34_RTR2X58N.jpg

    in reply to: 1:32 ME109G-14 #220246
    Freehand
    Participant

    A couple of better shots of ‘Miss D’
    http://i819.photobucket.com/albums/zz117/Blue2MGB/Mods/101.jpg

    http://i819.photobucket.com/albums/zz117/Blue2MGB/Mods/106.jpg

    http://i819.photobucket.com/albums/zz117/Blue2MGB/Mods/108.jpg

    Awesome color scheme, great work!

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2312762
    Freehand
    Participant

    wanshan, let’s wait until that thing does something to compare.

    the A-4, with modern electronics, especially if reengined, would be hard to beat in its weight class, by any nation. And if you add DSI… 😀

    Joke set aside, it may really need inlet modifications if it was to become supersonic, which it certainly would with more than 50% of thrust increase

    What about airframe stability? Do these updates include placing the airframe itself at zero hours? That would be expensive, perhaps even prohibitive, when comparing the cost to newer, surplus types. Operations at sea tend to shorten the lives of aircraft through corrosion and general wear-n-tear. Going into the question, the Skyhawks are already 30+ years old. We can place all of the advanced tech we want in an aged design, but if the airframe is compromised, what’s the benefit?

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2312766
    Freehand
    Participant

    ^^^ Exactly, so PLA-AF which operates 350 J-7 isn’t even interested in acquiring any state of the art JF-17. 😉

    They do have the J-10, the forthcoming J-20 and they are license-building the J-11/J-15. Maybe there just isn’t a place for the JF-17 in the PLAAF? I don’t see the Chinese exporting the J-10, though there is a good market for it. Pakistan has ordered the type, but I’ll wait until delivery to count it as ‘in service. Even then it will take time for the aircraft to be a combat-ready asset.

    Freehand
    Participant

    Tight Squeeze

    Looking at the size of HMS Ocean and the width of the Thames where it’s moored, I would like to see how they plan to get the ship out of the river. I’m not a sailor, but are they planning to drive the ship out backwards?

    in reply to: AVIC JF-17 Thunder versus SAAB JAS-39 Gripen #2313202
    Freehand
    Participant

    [QUOTE=JSLLL4;1869051]Good point. JF-17 has a more technologically advanced airframe. Don’t forget that JF-17 is the world’s first plane that incorporates DSI, both in the prototype stage and in the operational stage.

    The U.S. tested a DSI intake on an F-16 in 1996, the first nation to take such a notion into the air. Makes me wonder where the data from those tests wound-up. The F-35 is the first completely new design to come out of a the U.S. since that time. Today’s F-22 layout was already designed and cut by 1998. The Thunder and other Chinese designs use DSI, but they were not there first.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diverterless_supersonic_inlet

    in reply to: AMX vs Harrier for usefulness in a carrier #2313460
    Freehand
    Participant

    Left Field

    A far-flung option could be to weaponize the T-45. A newer, stronger wing and single seat could make for a compelling type to operate from small carriers.

Viewing 15 posts - 916 through 930 (of 951 total)