Looks like Albanian colors (compare with their Cougars).
I think it is up to the pilot, and who sees who first. The aircraft can’t do anything without a well-trained pilot in the cockpit.
Maybe the Su-34 or a strike-fighter variant of the Su-30? That platform can carry a decent amount of weapons and deliver they semi-accurately. A Tu-22M could do the same and have great effect, but there would be a great deal of collateral damage. I also think this would be a great place for the Cobra. Mi-24/28s are nice, but the snake could do just as good a job.
Poor economies, shrinking defense budgets, diminished strategic threats, an evolved battlefield, and the incredibly high costs of developing an aircraft are big factors in the down-turn of European military aviation. This is not endemic to Europe it is everywhere. The lack of a credible air threat from the former USSR strains the new for new, high-performance combat aircraft. 21st century wars have seen little, if no air combat. Western and NATO have operated with near impunity over hostile areas, despite the advent of advanced SAM systems. Terrorists and rebels tend not to operate these types of weapons (the former Yugoslavia excluded). The cost of developing a new combat aircraft is so high that there is a very little chance of profitability from a single nation perspective. The last few projects have been multinational collaboration efforts (Alpha Jet, Tornado, Typhoon). Only Sweden and France have gone it alone. For Sweden, the proposition has paid off nicely with several export orders. Sweden also built an aircraft tailored to their defense needs and not so much for the international market, which turned out to fill many other nation’s needs. The idea of a light fighter doesn’t really sit well with all military planners as the can carry fewer weapons and less fuel than a heavier, twin-engined strike fighter. The Rafalé has just met with export success, and that has come from wealthy nations in the Middle-East. The A400M is Europe’s biggest military aviation project as of now, with the most potential, despite the recent crash. Airbus Military even believes a substantial market exists for the aircraft in the U.S. (I’d like to see the market research behind that). These products are more expensive than their counterparts from the 20th century, a time when economies were better and defense spending was up. European air forces are forced to procure fewer examples and do more with less, like every other air arm.
The last time I was in Finland, the locals were not too crazy about Americans. It think it would take a dire circumstance to have the Finns welcome the American military into their country. The U.S. will try to get involved nonetheless, but it won’t be a happy marriage. I think the F-35 is overkill for Finland. Time will really tell if it is the lemon it is made out to be. If I were buying for an air force, I would adopt a wait-and-see approach towards the F-35. That is, if the massive cost could be justified. I still think the Gripen is the way to go. It can defend Finnish air space, perform multirole tasks, and comes in at a better price. What are the alternatives? F/A-18E/F, Rafalé? Both of those would be good choices as well, albeit more costly. The ideal could be a mix between Gripen E/F light fighters and F/A-18F ~ E/A-18G strike fighters. They could use common weapons, similar engines (F414), and add much more versatility than a fleet of F-35s.
????
The only country that could possibly threaten Finland, is of course Russia.
IF such a situation should arise, rest assured that Russia would use whatever means they deem necessary to handle the conflict.
I would turn this around and ask; why on earth would they NOT put S-400 along the border of Finland during a conflict that has the potential to escalate to a full-blown war? Why would they not do it? Please make your case!
F-35 has had a lot of issues, it is far above budget, however it is coming along nicely now. The costs for developing F-35 are staggering; HOWEVER most of the bill is picked up by US tax-payers. In particular, when Finland is about to go shopping, the F-35 price will be significantly lower than what it is today. Finland will not be hit by the huge budget overruns, that will all be history and sunk costs when they place their order.
It doesn’t make sense for Russia to stiffen-up its border with Finland. Didn’t they get the hint from the last war they had? What would Russia have to gain from a tense situation with Helsinki. Putin may be bold, but he is not stupid. He is going to leave the Finns alone. Back when Russia was in the Soviet Union, and was much more powerful, they didn’t mess around there. The Russians used to show off their latest military aircraft in Finland (1978, 1986). It was in Finland, the West got their first real glimpse of the MiG-29. Why would Russia opt to demonstrate and market theirs goods to a nation that they are ready to go war against? Why would the Russians make waves now, when their armed forces are at a low in capability? The majority of Russian AF aircraft are old an in poor shape from years of on-again, off-again maintenance and support. A few examples of some later types like the Su-30/34/35 does not equate to an overall enhanced force. If things keep up their pace, in ten years the Russian AF could pose a significant threat to its neighbors, but I’ll put my money on a Finn in an F-18 over a Russian in an Su-27.
The Gripen makes the most sense. There is the possibility of local production, technology transfer, and a common support model. It is really tough to justify the F-35’s huge cost. Under what circumstances would the Finns find themselves facing an S-400? Are the Russians going to place them on the border so that their RADAR coverage extends into Finland? 100-150 million per example is hard to justify for that reason alone. Especially for an aircraft that is near IOC, but not capable of fulfilling all of its intended roles. Finland is not going to invade Russia. The U.S. and NATO would get involved long before the opposite would happen (when is there a conflict the U.S. does stay out of?).
Gripen E/F, 36 of them
The Russian AF is like every other air arm in the world, strapped for cash. It has to invest it’s few resources where they think it will do the most good. They need equipment that will be able to counter the F-22 and F-35 if they want to stay relevant. Eighties-vintage Su-27Ps and MiG-29s are not going to cut it.
It was a Foxbat, now it is a burned piece of scrap.
“Military Aviation News – 2015″
And that means discussion is prohibited?
“This gets kind of tedious.” This is a discussion thread, last time I checked.
“There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.” I am sure the Chinese can’t wait to get a closer look at the systems on an AH-1Z.
How’d he get the Cessnas? Black market?
Did Trumpeter’s kit a few years back
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235452[/ATTACH]