As for the aircraft itself just looks so good I wonder if there would be a way of recreating the whistle of DB running in at full tilt or would that mean more
manufacturing and also alter the appearance it has ?
The Allison is about 10L smaller than the DB605 so its exhaust note could lack a bit of oompf by comparison. Making new camshafts with a similar valve timing profile as the DB605 might help. But the defining audio characteristic (in my mind at least) of the German V12s is the “supercharger whine”. I put that in inverted commas as I’m fairly certain its not the supercharger impeller/volute per se that causes it otherwise it would sound the same as an Allison or Merlin supercharger. Assuming I’m correct then it comes from the supercharger fluid coupling and/or the bevel gear driving it. Perhaps a similar sort of noise making contraption could be created to run on one of the Allison accessory drives. All the rest of the gearsets in the DB605 are essentially the same as those used other aero V12s.
What sort of propeller are they intending to use with the Allison?
The R-2800 seems to be the preferred choice for Sea Furies now, see here: http://www.sandersaeronautics.com/restoration_seafury-r2800.asp
115/145 avgas is still available from VP Racing Fuels in the US.
With respect to the oil issue there is some potentially good news on the horizon in that the Swift Fuels 102 octane unleaded fuel looks like it will become a reality (fingers crossed). This opens up the possiblity of using synthetic oils in aircraft piston engines. https://swiftfuels.com/fuel/ul102-avgas/
Did the Napier Sabre use Aeroshell 100U or was that a post war development?
Have you considered a replica propeller based on the MT hub? The ones MT Propeller designed and built for the XP-82 project certainly look the part albeit with pressed wood blades.
http://generalaviationnews.com/2010/12/22/mt-composite-prop-flight-tested-on-warbird/
The Napier Sabre deserves a book. As do the Daimler and Jumo V12s. I would love to see the auto/biographies of Richard Vogt, Ryoichi Nakagawa and Takeo Doi translated into english. The remaining 5 volumes of Janic Geelen’s study of the de Havilland company are notable for their absence. The Grumman OV-1 Mohawk and North American OV-10 Bronco deserve more than a couple of skimpy modellers’ walk arounds. +1 on French aeronautical engineering, an english translation of ‘les Avions Caudron Renault’ by Mihaly and Robinson would be a good start. A Piper equivalent of the ‘Cessna Wings for the World’ series would be nice also.
Is there anything wrong or to complain about this approach ? Apart from not using historically original seventy year old aluminium blades subject to intragranular corrosion dug out of a swamp.
Generally speaking, due to their structural properties, wood core blades have wider diameter shanks/butts than aluminium or steel blades so substituting the former for the later requires a new hub as well. Fortunately the provenance police only seem to be concerned with airframes and paint schemes so no worries there. If you are a member of the AEHS there is an article on the propellers developed by MT for the P-82 project in the US. I think it was presented at the 2011 convention.
Modern composite propellers (typically foam core) as found on large turboprops are a different kettle of fish. Here the fibre/matrix ‘shell’ (carbon, aramid, glass etc) is taking most of the load (as opposed to a compressed wooden core doing the work). Thinner sections (than wood) are able to be used but ringing/resonance properties are closer to those of metal blades.
Oooh, brand nostalgia. In addition to Douglas (pre MD) I miss Convair, Lockheed and deHavilland in the airliner market too.
If you would like an overview of the various trials and tribulations of the american aviation industry try ‘Pushing the Envelope’ by Donald Pattillo.
Thanks for the recommendations, it looks like there are some interesting books to pursue. I didn’t know about the servicing commando units.
The Classic Publications series are currently about as good as it gets for English language German aircraft monographs. I haven’t read the He 162 book, but I have a number of the others in the series and I don’t think you would be disappointed with it.
However, before reading it, I would urge you to get a copy of “Arming the Luftwaffe” by Daniel Uziel.
The main topic of the book is the German aircraft industry as a whole during WWII, but it has a fairly comprehensive case study of the development and operation of the He 162 at the end of the book. Published in 2012, this book seems to have slipped under the radar which is a shame because to my mind at least, it is something of a landmark work.
Very fast and “Oh-so-close”…
Lefty Gardner at 4:10
There are (were) the Griffon powered air racers – Red Baron, Miss Ashley II and Precious Metal. A MkXIV Spitfire (race 80?) put in an appearance in one of the post war Thompson trophy races.
According to the AEHS website, author Dave Birch has been collecting the serial numbers of surviving Merlins for an upcomming RRHT book. It will be interesting to see what his final tally is.
http://www.enginehistory.org/
Did any of the tooling or drawings survive from the Lidcombe plant in Australia?
Ah no! For a given grade of steel the forged process will always be stronger and more durable than the machined.
I was of the understanding that crankshafts were a unique case due to the large amount of dislocation required to get the material out to the crankpin and counterweight area and that machining a solid block of forged billet gives better results. Mind you I also believed my mother when she told me that frogs were green because they photosynthesised which turned out not to be true either.
Tony the strongest modern cranks are still forged.
Not neccesarily. CNC machined billet steel cranks can be stronger because thay can be made at room temperature from stronger alloys than those which are able to be forged. This has become standard practice for many high end racing engines today.
I wonder if Continental Motors still has drawings for the Merlin.
So you have come up with a crankshaft manufactured to modern standards as opposed to forged…… Now get it certified, the CAA would turn to the Design Authority and they would tell you where to get off. Indeed the CAA would throw it out long before that.
I don’t understand. How would certifying a crankshaft differ from any of the new design parts that Roush Aviation has already had certified for the Merlin? http://www.roushaviation.com/parts-inventory.aspx