dark light

Zodiacchris

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chilton G-AFSV progress. #798225
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Hello Roger,

    The metal Chilton is being built in Taree, New South Wales, and I’ve been working on it since December last year. It is indeed built to fly, the Chiltons are lovely looking classics and regrettably there are only a few around. Not being a wood person, building it in metal was an easy choice for me and my previous project was a 75% Spitfire which was good preparation. I’m currently working on the outer wing panels and hope to have the basic construction finished by July.

    I downloaded a set of Roys plans, had a look at the website and have also sourced a number of good quality large scale model plans to get sufficient information to modify the structure of the aircraft, as building it according to the original wood plans is not feasible. While the fuselage was pretty straightforward and is generally similar to the wooden version, the wings and tail feathers needed some extensive redesign with the loads and required material thickness calculated by a static engineer. We had to change the spar arrangement as the wooden spars didn’t translate and also use a modified NACA12 profile to handle bending loads. That said, the outer mould line and dimensions are basically unchanged and should retain the character of the original Chiltons.

    The engine is going to be a 80hp Rotax 912 in a close fitting cowl, empty weight will be about 100lbs more than than the original and cruise and VNE will be slightly higher. A friend is interested to also build one so I have made templates and his aircraft is in the early stages of construction, pending the static load testing (4g) of my airframe.

    Please give my regards to Roy, his plans have been very helpful and have made this endeavour much more straightforward.

    Kind regards,

    Chris Weber

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #806145
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    More pictures

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257098[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]257099[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257100[/ATTACH]

    Youtube https://youtu.be/DyDym2m-o20

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #806178
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Adter receiving the required oermit to fly, the last ten days have been very busy indeed. The K5054 tribute Spitfire has flown, with a total of 27 hours of air under the wings so far. The test flights showed a few minor isdues to be present, with CoG corrections and ballasting of the nose required, plus a few other things. We are currently working on the replica radiator and oil cooler, with early prototypes already dived to VNE. A short video of the aircraft in flight is on youtube under Spitfire K5054 Tribute Flies, and a few pictures are attached below. We are currently waiting for a few parts to arrive, before continuing with the flying in February next year. Seven years of building, per aspera ad astra!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257095[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]257096[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257097[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #830278
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Thanks for the offer Brenden!
    The aircraft will undergo the test flying in Taree, NSW, and I have two photographers lined up so far, so should have that side of things covered!
    Cheers,
    Chris

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #831555
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Thank you guys!
    Moggy, the aircraft is fully aerobatic, but the recreational license does not allow unusal attitudes. However, it can be re-registered as GA experimental (a bit of a faff paperwork wise), and then be wrung out.
    I’ll post some pictures once she is in the air, and has her radiators…
    Cheers,
    Chris

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #831926
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Hi Cees,
    I understand your point of view, however the crowd in this forum is able to appreciate this more than the light aircraft guys, to whom this is just a funny coloured sports aircraft. I have enjoyed your posts over the years as I am both a historic aviation fan and avid builder, and have admired the work you have done with what you have unearthed in the Netherlands and the cockpits you have built. But if we are discussing cockpit replicas in the historical section, a lot of which include new material, NOS instruments and replica bits, why not this? At least it flies and, seen from a distance, will be the closest to K5054 we have seen in flight for a long time.
    We have endless threads about mahogany boxes and buried Spitfires, corroded fragments and all sorts of rumours, so maybe there is enough room for this in the historical section, too?
    I avoid the TIGAR threads and anything Amelia related, because life is too short, so you can choose to ignore this one if it doesn’t tick your box. I guess if it is too much in the left field, the moderators will take it out anyway…
    Cheers,
    Chris

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #832041
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    The main parts I had/used from the Supermarine kit were the jigged components for the outer wing panels, centre section spar, 70% of the fuselage bulkheads and firewall, about half of the fuselage skins, and a bunch of smaller bits like throttle quadrant and retract levers. I also had some of the old production templates from the single seater. No plans, I had to work from first principle, but the this is aircraft No6 that I’ve built. Halfway through I had to make the hard decision about the rear upper fuselage shape, where the Supermarine kit is just shaped like a carrot, and the Spitfire has the turn down/hump. So I lowered the fuselage, raised the cockpit sides, and built the appropriate windscreen and canopy. Disadvantage was, that I traded the looks for me flying the aircraft, as at 6’4” I then couldn’t close the canopy any more and didn’t really fit. But rather that than ugly!
    Firewall forward with the Rotax912S, the UC, cockpit section with the associated bulkheads are all scratch built, the spinner is from a Vickers Vicount, the pitot tube and mast are original Spitfire from a MK5…

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #832147
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Hi Daren,
    Feel free to post the pictures on the Spitfire page! The 75% scale is due to engine choice, you really have to go big and powerfull for a full size, plus I got a set of jigged 75% outer wing panels, which were the core of the project, which kinda locked me into this size. Fuselage, wing and tailfeathers are proportional to the MK1, and had I built it larger with the wings I had the chord would have looked wrong. Additionally, as this is registered as a recreational experimental homebuilt (ahh, the freedom we have here in Australia :eagerness:), I had to stay under 600kg MTOW. Should I suffer another prolonged lapse of reason and want to punish myself, I might build a 90% Bf109, D or E model. Much easier, lots of straight bits like wings and elevators. Building the tailfeathers, wing tips and flaps for the Spitfire from scratch was a real challenge, there isn’t a straight line or non tapering bit! But it has been fun and a priviledge to have the opportunity to see this turn from a pipe dream to a living and breathing aircraft 🙂

    in reply to: Flying K5054 Replica #832416
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Thanks! The R flag is indeed for a BRS system, it is a high speed unit for 325 km/h and 625kg. The emty weight is 370kg, 80 litres of fuel, 1000 km range at 130 knots cruise. Currently working on the radiators, which will be mock ups and fitted adter the initial flights, and serve as storage for long range trips…

    in reply to: 80 Spitfires? #914880
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Tribute to K5054

    Well, here is my tribute to K5054 being prepped for flight. After 6 years of work I missed the date by a month, meant to fly it on the 6th of March. Will be April now…
    The pitot mast and tube are genuine, so I guess it counts for this thread!:angel:

    in reply to: Martin Baker MB-5 Rep for sale…. #868242
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    The shorter the fuselage, the more sensitive the aircraft will be in pitch. For example Zenair CH601 Zodiacs have short rear fuselages, and they are very sensitive…

    in reply to: 'Action Stations' ceased trading? #893998
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Spoke to Chris from Action Stations today, regrettably it is true, and they have gone into receivership. He advised me to try to get the money I paid for the Silver Experience flight back through my credit card company, as there was nothing to expect from the receivers. Big bummer that! My wife booked this for me as birthday present in January last year, and I am not holding my breath what our bank back home in Australia is going to say to that.

    Ahh well, I’ll have to wait till my MK25 is ready next year till I fly with/in a Spitfire, even if it is just a lookalike. **** happens…

    in reply to: 'Action Stations' ceased trading? #895809
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    So, does anybody have any hard information on Action Stations ceasing business, before we drift off-topic? I have paid for a Silver Experience with them, but won’t be able to take the flight till next summer, as I am in Australia and this years date that I could have made was cancelled on short notice while I was in the UK (bummer). I have not received an email from them, but will give them a call tomorrow after the bank holiday…

    Chris

    in reply to: Catalina beached in USA #870414
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Oh for crying out loud!!! God bless America indeed, they need all the help they can get if they go about things like that! I’ll be damned if I watch that film, murdering a lovely aircraft like that…

    No, seriously, the sea was calm as a pond, and they could have used a submerged barge instead of trying to lift it. Or yes, just used lifting bags and towed it to a ramp. Accidents are bad enough, but this is just bizarre and just so frustrating!

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay (2015) #880178
    Zodiacchris
    Participant

    Lancaster cowling!

    Under ‘Aircraft Parts’, there is a complete set of engine cowlings for the outer port engine of a Lancaster! A bit bashed from storage but nothing that couldn’t be sorted fairly easily.

    Item No is 121683342656, sorry can’t work out to put a link in with my iPad.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 23 total)