dark light

Snoopy7422

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Crazy landing, anyone know what type? #1006124
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    At 5000ft you would have the grace of some air under you…

    Surplus height. Surplus speed. Same thing.;) Watch the video again.

    in reply to: Crazy landing, anyone know what type? #1006942
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Chains.

    That’s the trouble with pushbikes.:) Safer and healthier to walk, but not as much fun..:diablo:

    in reply to: Spitfire Props #1007077
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Huh…

    If the tacho on a Spit reads airscrew RPM it’s news to me….. I can’t think of any a/c with this other than a helicraptor.:eek: My offhand recollection of the reduction ratio of the Spit was about 2.8:1.

    in reply to: Crazy landing, anyone know what type? #1007088
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    There are old pilots and bold pilots……………….

    ….and there’s ‘elf & safety’. Let’s face it, it it was invented today, the bicycle would be banned…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Crazy landing, anyone know what type? #1007833
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Nice Lean Fat Free Landing.

    No margins at low level. Living on borrowed time, methinks.

    That all depends on the pilot. Period…..:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Why has this Beaufighter not been recovered? #1007977
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Duh..?

    I think you will find there are a number of aircraft that could be recovered but arn’t that come in the category of ‘shame’ I would dearly like the RAFM Beaufighter to return to Portugal and a combat veteran to take it’s place!

    From memory there is a Beaufighter ripe for recovery in Norway too !

    Huh….???? Too much Christmas sherry I think…!:confused:

    in reply to: Supermarine Swift EX Sheppards Surplus #1009990
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Hats Off…

    Hats off to the folks taking this one on. Standing under it, one could look up and see light as the corrosion was so bad, – and that was about 20-30 years ago… Not the loveliest or most successful machine ever, but a rare survivvor nonetheless.
    I’m surprised at how complete it is I must say.

    Anyone any ideas where it’s intended to end-up..?

    in reply to: Napier Dagger & Rapier engines how many exist ? #1012694
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Not Quite, but….

    One of the more arcane items in my posession is an oil-cooler for a Napier Rapier off the S.20 Mayo composite. I’m no authority on the Rapier, but I don’t think that they were fitted to much else;- around a dozen engines in six types….so it’s possibly the last piece of S.20 left.

    Is the Rapier at Old Warden the only one left…? Any ideas what it came off….?

    The Napier engines were all interesting, but all seemed to have been problematic. 🙂

    in reply to: Pull out Pin and throw #1015458
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Don’t you just love a well researched article !!! 😮

    Just shows the dangers of talking to journalists – you never know what utter s#*te they will turn whatever you might say into 🙁

    ’tis ever thus…! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Is there a squadron of Spitfires buried in Birmingham? #1016454
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Naaaaa……

    The stories I heard years ago about VACBAF were that they had buried Lancasters, which is even more unlikely….! After a/c production had finished at VACBAF, GKN came in to turn it over to car-body production etc. I’ve no doubt that any remnants had all been sent to the scrappy by the time that they moved-in.

    The problem with most of these stories is that in almost all cases, there would have been just no incentive whatever to go to all that trouble, when they could just give it to a scrappy – for free if necessary. I know from research many years ago that even when the scrap prices were rock-bottom after the war, stuff just sat around until the prices went up again. At which juncture, every pikey in the UK started to remember where all this junk was…..

    I did come across entirely credible stories of stuff being buried out of expediency, when units found that they had stock – but no paperwork for it. Whatever has been buried for seventy years or so is going to be rotted to hell anyway.

    Some years ago, I purchased a job-lot of stuff. Some had been stored in a hangar with a damp floor, and some in an old lorry-body. Most of the stuff went to the tip as it was so corroded – and it hadn’t even been buried in the wet ground for seventy years….:rolleyes:

    Still, we live in hope eh……..!!! :p

    in reply to: Is there a squadron of Spitfires buried in Birmingham? #939078
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    !!!!

    …no no no no no – please nooooooooooo……………:eek:

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #940768
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    You read my mind..!

    It’s not hard to see why some fora ‘go offshore’ nowadays. Anyone got any IT contacts in Tajikistan?

    It would certainly solve some of the issues… What’s ‘Snoopy’ in Tadjicicanese – or whatever they call it…? :p

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #940836
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    True.

    Maybe if the forum had stayed in its lane discussing historic aviation (which it used to be quite good at) none of this would have happened. If people want to argue that the banned thread was relevant to this subject (discussing company accounts & the role of charity trustees) then maybe the same connection can be made that we could, for example, discuss the terms & conditions of the Key Publishing Editor’s employment contract. Or maybe not.

    In essence, I agree. Chatting about historic aviation is one thing. Some of the threads do however degenerate into something resembling an argument between washerwomen. Aviation is just that, those funny things that fly – and the people who made them do it. The rest just gets, – to quote the names of The Goodies solicitors ‘Terribly, Terribly, Boring & Dull’.

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #941022
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Bex.. can I ask you a question?

    It’s late on a Friday afternoon when all good lawyers are in the Wig & Pen. The webbie is on holiday when a threat comes in from an organisation that accuses named posters on the forum of some kind of defamation / libel.

    As a director of Key would you run the risk of ignoring it until you were finally able to get hold of a legal beagle, or would you move the thread out of sight and put a temporary suspension on those members to hold things until a proper response could be formulated?

    Moggy

    You did the only thing you could. Frankly, I saw this coming days ago. I’m just surprised anyone on the forum is surprised. Hey ho.

    in reply to: DH prop manuals #941633
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    PD30.

    DB;-PM sent…;)

    Snoopy.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 761 total)