dark light

Snoopy7422

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 751 through 761 (of 761 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wing Commander Peter Ayerst DFC #1040900
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Peter Ayerst.

    I’ll second that. Many Happy Returns to a great survivor. Mines a Doom Bar….:)

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1040910
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    SCION;- More, more, more…

    1930’s racers, the Single Malt of aviation…

    in reply to: Percival Proctor 6 Floatplane #1042129
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Pedantic, but….

    I have seen two Queen 30 ‘s that came out of Prentices, probably early examples. The first Prentice flew on March 31st, ’46. The one-off Proctor IVa with ply-covered wings was the test-bed for the Q50 & Q70. The one-off Proctor VI was built ’46/’47, and was probably also fitted with an original DH.Q30. The Herons were designed around the Q30, but most had the DH (Actually Bristol Siddeley)Q30-2 fitted. The Q32 was a fractionally different engine. I think the RN Herons stayed in service until the 1980’s, so the 30-2 ‘s lasted pretty well in the end.

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1042529
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Pics.

    Ah, – echoes of halcyon days…:)

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1042733
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Fascinating.

    Very interesting. Someone who should know better told me that the washout hadn’t made a blind bit of difference. It just goes to show that scuttlebutt is a poor source of information….!
    Incidentally, how about posting some of these air to air photos..? It’d be lovely to see the Comet in the sunshine, especially alongside the Caudron too…:)

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1042753
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Comet Replica.

    Mike,
    …ahhh..the power of the web…!
    I was very interested to see the landing in that clip, as it appeared to be a three-pointer, or at least a tailhook. Modern wisdom has been to wheel the ‘SS on, but I’m given to understand that this replica did have some washout built-in, whereas the originals supposedly had none. I’ve alway been instinctively sceptical about this.
    When the a/c flew originally, there were few problems, given what was asked of them in terms of load, CofG, weather and rough strips with very tired crews (The Mildenhall incident with the Mollisons aside.). This has made me wonder if there might actually have been (more) wash-out originally. None of the other a/c has survived intact, but I think the drawings have survived. I wonder what they specified…. Mr.Jones would know, as he’s started on his wings I think.
    Either way, what a quintessentially lovely aeroplane…!

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1042777
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Comet Replica + Bonus Caudron.

    See here;-

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ppj0qALbAw

    ..and;-

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL3CQn5KM40

    Nicely filmed.

    in reply to: Current Comet Status #1042780
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Comet Replica.

    It was certainly flown by Christophe Marchand on the fifth of May this year, in formation with other a/c including the interesting Caudron racer replica, to Hemet USA.
    It’s about time ‘SS got some air under her wheels again. I thought that was the idea of extending the runway at Old Warden…? That’d get me over there quicker than a whole squadron of Wildcats. :p

    in reply to: Landing gear to identify… #1043657
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Can’t see the size, but the first and last look suspiciously like Beau to me…..if a bit small.

    in reply to: Proctor Part Queries. #1043825
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    Thanks for that. I’m still hoping someone will have a lead on some answers. 🙂

    in reply to: Percival Gull G-ADPR #1044786
    Snoopy7422
    Participant

    ‘PR

    It’s very hard to criticise the Shuttleworth Collection, as they have done so much fantastic work, so I’m certainly not a detractor. If the Gull had to be exported, then, one may take consolation in the fact that it went to a very appropriate home.
    However, the Gull is such a rare British a/c that every effort should have been made to keep it in the UK. Maybe it was. I’d have thought though, there would have been plenty of takers. The a/c was also donated to the Collection gratis, after money had been spent to refurbish it. It just doesn’t seem fair for it to be turned into a cash asset. Had I donated it, I’d’ve been a bit miffed, but I’m sure they didn’t relish this painful loss.
    Of course, it’s all in the eye of the beholder. The theme of the Collection always had a very pleasant bias towards rare, old, pre-war British a/c, which was very much the greater part of it’s charm, and why I’d traverse the country for what is quite an expensive day out. The Collection is also a centre of knowledge for maintaining and operating such machines.
    There is much less interest in post war a/c, and the Collection are obviously well aware of that. When it come to foreign aircraft….it’s much more difficult and I’ve seen and heard enough discussion to know that there are some strong opinions on this.
    The simple fact is, all the ‘real’ Percival aircraft were made from wood, and the Collection now has none.

Viewing 11 posts - 751 through 761 (of 761 total)