dark light

XM692.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 238 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: C47 #1163762
    XM692.
    Participant
    in reply to: Harrier T4 XW272 #1164359
    XM692.
    Participant

    Neil,

    Welcome to the madhouse, however Ian sold that cockpit a few years ago to another guy whose a member here (also a Neil)

    Thus….

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/member.php?u=9805

    However the cockpit was an unflown ‘boiler-plate’ or ‘space-model’ from Dunsfold and not the real XW272. More details (and photo’s) in this thread….

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34155

    Cheers.

    .

    in reply to: Crashed Aeroplanes – War Graves – Time Team #1167027
    XM692.
    Participant

    Don’t you just love the search function….. ๐Ÿ˜€

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=34999

    .

    in reply to: Fenland and West Norfolk Avation museum #1171391
    XM692.
    Participant

    ….I intend to go back once the Museum is open for visitors and have a better look around. I’ll take some more pics and post them here if people are interested.

    And the Whirlwind, dont forget the Whirlwind ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    .

    in reply to: BAPC 7th March, 2009 #1174346
    XM692.
    Participant

    Yes.

    .

    in reply to: An observation…. #1176327
    XM692.
    Participant

    If we split them into another forum, I think there is less chance of us all enjoying them as they come up.

    Why ?

    Other parts of the Key forums have their own sub-forums (and some very little usage they receive as well); can’t Historic have a sub-forum then ?

    I’m just itching to launch the “Post your Hillson Bi-mono pic’s here” thread :diablo:

    .

    in reply to: An observation…. #1176984
    XM692.
    Participant

    Yes a sub-forum for such photo’s within the Historic forum is a very good idea. After all, the others have sub-forums eg: missiles & munitions (yes really !!!)

    Who could action this… moderators or webbie ?

    .

    in reply to: An observation…. #1178270
    XM692.
    Participant

    Just “an observation”, i wondered over to the photographic forum and back again. Couldn’t help but notice it’s 3 sub sections, entitled….

    Tutorial, Airshow Photo’s and Civil Aircraft none of which seem best to cover photo’s of Historic types per se.

    .

    in reply to: Vulcan at (cold) war ? #1178610
    XM692.
    Participant

    David,

    I have Tim’s book, i will re-read more carefully, thanks.

    Surprised by the other replies stating only one bomb though. Is it just SAC aircraft that had multiple targets then ?

    Cheers….

    Dave T’

    .

    in reply to: Vulcan at (cold) war ? #1179485
    XM692.
    Participant

    I think Blue Steel was the nuclear deterrent in which case it would be one weapon per aircraft.

    Nope…. after Blue Steel. The period when Polaris took over the nuclear deterrant and the V-force reverted to conventional bombing and tactical nuclear weapons.

    Perhaps on a ‘real’ mission they would have carried the bomb bay fuel tank and maybe 3 weapons ?

    .

    in reply to: An observation…. #1179651
    XM692.
    Participant

    Can we have a Hillson Bi-Mono thread pleeeese ?

    .

    in reply to: Post your Gnat photos here. #1179656
    XM692.
    Participant

    Nice photo’s HP81, thanks for sharing.

    Which is the raison d’รชtre for this and similiar threads. Hope you don’t get stoned against a wall as a result ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    The Midge was a pale blue with red codes, and my guess at the others would be XK739, XK740 and XK741.

    .

    in reply to: Post your Firefly pictures here. #1180143
    XM692.
    Participant

    I say, steady on Pete. Only a minority are allowed to post photo’s these days. :diablo:

    .

    in reply to: An observation…. #1180192
    XM692.
    Participant

    Three words….. POT, KETTLE, BLACK

    So…. it’s ok praise and savour such photo’s as those posted by DT (aka ‘Postfade’), but if anyone else has a photographic contribution to the ‘historic’ forum, then it’s brickbats not bouquets ?

    Fine by me…. i shall seriously have to reconsider if such photo’s from normally private collections should be shared in future.

    Obviously it’s ~not~ taken as a bit of harmless fun that isn’t hurting anyone (after all why L@@K at a particular thread if you know what it’s gonna be about ?), unlike yet more bitching and in-fighting about XH558 etc, etc…..

    http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/WN957/Emoticons/wall.gif

    .

    in reply to: Super Aero crash at Blackbushe. #1181813
    XM692.
    Participant

    .
    Two pictures of G-APRR on airliners.net when it masquaraded as a HE-111 smiles

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Let-Aero-Ae-45/1161713/M/

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Let-Aero-Ae-45/1161712/M/

    regards

    Matk Pilkington

    Love it…. :D:D

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 238 total)