dark light

Cherry Ripe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 480 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2382871
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    How many of those 86,000 are working at RN bases repairing ships and maintaining the weapons and ammunition?

    How many of those 86,000 are working on RAF bases doing the same things?

    Same question for the army.

    I don’t know, that’s why I am asking. The MoD refuses to make this clear in their reports, they roll everything up into “Delivering Defence Capability“.

    I have gone through the 2008 and 2009 accounts. It tells me the salary for every senior staff officer and how many shares the MoD holds in QinetiQ and the Met Office, and how much was written-off on service contract changes, but not what those civilian staff are doing.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2383116
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    MoD civilian budget

    I was trying to determine what proportion of the defence budget is currently consumed by the 86,000+ MoD civilian staff but most reports intertwine the MoD, Forces and RFA budgets so it’s not straight-forward.

    I did find this article which reports a £1.8 billion payroll for junior MoD civil servants, plus another £19.3 million for permanent staff, but I’m not convinced that this is the whole picture and it doesn’t incorporate operating costs.

    This is probably the best that I have found in terms of civilian staff numbers.

    I appreciate that we need some form of civilian administration to take the burden off the pointy-end, but trying to quantify what we currently have is not easy. Certainly no private-sector organisation could survive with a 2:1 delivery:admin staff ratio.

    in reply to: Could the Argentine air force now Challenge the U.K.? #2383321
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Blue Kingdom sends it’s SSNs to positions within TLAM range of REDina’s major cities, infrastructure and military assets and starts knocking them out one by one until REDina withdraws its forces and grovels for mercy.

    The UK *cough* Blue Kingdom originally procured 65 TLAMs and fired-off an “undisclosed number” into Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq ( note: all joint ops with US consent ).

    An additional 64 were delivered from 2008 onwards.

    Say 100 remaining. Say, for argument, all were deployed towards Redina.

    2% launch failure rate seems average for TLAM, so 98 fly.

    Hit rate in Desert Storm was about 84% of launches, so let’s be generous and say the IAD is in similar disarray and 82 TLAMs strike-home. That’s one-third of the 242 TLAM hits during Desert Storm, and one-third of 238 TLAMs fired by US forces during Allied Force.

    Is that enough to crush Redina, without any supporting air campaign?

    What happens next? Will the USA replenish stocks after the UN Security Council reaches deadlock? Will the USA even allow those 98 birds to fly?

    in reply to: anyone got a pic of a Mi-8/17 with a UH-60? #2383717
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    interesting link.
    I did not know the AW101/EH101 is the same size as the S-70/UH-60. thought it was alot bigger.

    Hmm yes, the 101 should be on par with the Mi-8. Looks like he made an error with the scaling on that one. I’ll drop him a line.

    Off topic, but Mi-4 against Whirlwind is enlightening.

    in reply to: anyone got a pic of a Mi-8/17 with a UH-60? #2383723
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    What dimensions are you comparing?

    Mi-8 vs S-70

    Fuselage lengths are 59 ft 7 in versus 50 ft 0.75 in
    Length rotors-turning 82 ft 9 in versus 64 ft 10 ins

    See also this link for scale

    One consideration that is often missed in the “Mi-8 v S-70” debates is that the former has an usable cabin height, 5 ft 11 in which allows troops to move around and generally perform useful tasks. The S-70s 4 ft 6 in cabin height requires shuffling around on knees or squatting on bums.

    A more direct counterpart for the S-70 in terms of cabin volume and payload is the Ka-29.

    in reply to: Recorded strange kills #2384100
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Quick snap of the relevant section from WAPJ 37. No scanner handy…

    No the Mi-24 didn’t have R-60 capability in 1982, but that wasn’t the argument that googeler was making.

    in reply to: Recorded strange kills #2384145
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Unless you can provide a real picture of a Hind carrying AA-8 on its dedicated rail (not upside down on ATGM specific rails) we’ve got nothing to talk about.

    Not everything is on the internet.

    Check-out the Mi-24 article by Gordon and Komissarov in WAPJ 37.

    They provide a good deal of information about the R-60 installation on the Mi-24 including problems with seeker lock-on over the hot Central Asian steppes.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2384163
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    It may make sense to have the remaining Puma squadron of Benson join the Puma squadron in Aldergrove.

    RAF Aldergrove no longer exists, sadly. All RAF assets and personnel were removed by November 2009 and even the “Welcome to RAF Aldergrove” sign was donated to the Ulster Aviation Society.

    230 Sq packed their bags and went back to RAF Benson.

    in reply to: SAM Threat article #2384732
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Eric Waugh in “Wings as Eagles” notes that the Muj had a habit of firing Shorts Blowpipes in volleys of three or four at a single target, much in the manner of their anti-helicopter RPG ambushes but with a more potent projectile.

    Having had a couple of attempts to guide that beast in the simulator back in the late 1980s I don’t blame them; you needed remarkable perception and nerves of steel to stand there and fly a CLOS missile all the way in.

    The never had many of the Blowpipe ( rumour was that they were “lost” after delivery to Nigeria ). The volley firing didn’t do anything for the sales people’s Pk claims either!

    Oh AFM I don`t know when you become a comics magazine

    Well I couldn’t possibly comment, but I did stop buying it sometime back around 1997…

    in reply to: Recorded strange kills #2384741
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Although Mi-24s (in fact Mi-25s) should have shot down a few AH-! Cobras.

    I don’t have the reference to hand but there was an AH-1 “kill” of an Mi-24 on the East German border in the 1980s.

    The Cobra was performing the routine irritant of flying parallel to the boundary, then suddenly turning and dashing towards the border before flare-stopping at the limit.

    The Mi-24 tried to shadow it, but exceeded its flight limits and sheared-off the boom with a rotor strike.

    in reply to: The Ultimate Aviation Book? #1102521
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    For my birthday around the age of nine or ten I received a book entitled “Air Forces of the World” by Hickman, Sweetman, Wheeler and Gunston. It was first published in 1979.

    I learned more about global geo-politics from that book than any Geography text-book up to and including A-level.

    Even today if I want to learn about the formation and history of air forces / air corps / naval wings I first look in this tired old book. It still raises six quid for a used copy on Amazon and, best of all, there are no pictures of Spitfires 🙂

    Just opened it at a random page and read that the RAF based Shackletons at Majunga during the oil embargo on Beira, flying alongside Madagascan Skyraiders. Evocative stuff.

    in reply to: Additional Fuel May Pay Off In Tanker Competition #2385805
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Why exactly is the choice between two airliners? What happened to the idea of a purpose-built tanker? For example, LM’s diamond-wing with two booms.

    Supposing that there is much of a difference between one airliner with a 5 metre-wide cabin and another with a 5.28 metre cabin is rather daft when both are sub-optimal for the job.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386090
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Man, where would bombers going to bombard Belfast come? From the Atlantic? They’d come from the East, and Leuchars is in the perfect position to intercept anything coming from that direction.

    Swinging down from the North Sea.

    There was actually a proposal for an early-warning Type 80 Mk 2 radar installation at Uig to cover the northern gap but only the more easterly one in Saxa Vord was built.

    Killard Point ( Bishop’s Court ) near Downpatrick was originally built as a GCI station, so at least some action was anticipated over our little province.

    Addendum: also for historical note, recall the three Luftwaffe raids on Belfast, Bangor and Newtownards. Those sneaky Germans just flew up the Irish Sea from France! Curse their lack of sportsmanship!

    Anyway, direct conventional attack on the UK is now seen only as a Tier 3 risk, so those bombers might not be the threat against which the Typhoons are defending most of the UK.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2386125
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    No confusion; I know my Sentinels and Shadows apart. … Result of CASTOR it may have been, but it seems it was funded from the Afghanistan war chest – hence what you see today.

    The Sentinel contract for airframes and ground stations was signed with Raytheon in December 1999. However there were several change requests to adapt software to the Afghan mission and contract revisions to include deployment of contractors to Qatar in support. These may have been funded as UORs.

    Actually there didn’t appear to be much urgency associated with the project at all, given that three years were required for shake-down 🙂

    In terms of MPA, the Irish Air Corps often lease CASA time to the Irish Customs so perhaps we could ask nicely…

    in reply to: The Mosquito, capabilities under-estimated? #1125585
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    For the life of me i cant understand why the Mossie wasnt used instead of the heavies, even if it was for area bombing.

    Or tens of thousands of disposable Miles Hoop-La drones for area targets and a force of Mosquitoes for precision attacks.

    General le May never liked the B-58 because it wasn’t “big” enough for SAC ( “It didn’t fit my ass” ). Was there a similar mindset in Bomber Command?

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 480 total)