dark light

Severodvinsk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 514 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IN News and Discussion #2066404
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Basically, Gorshkov won’t be the same as she was before…
    A 80% rebuild, new engines, new weapons, new flight deck. Hmm, thinking of it, why not build a new carrier? :D, the steel has been delivered, the yard is going to make an extra-production line, because Gorshkov will occupy one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #408443
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    hmm, yes these pictures are quite known in our world. Well, it’s normal I suppose, be lucky that you get to see them. Lots of worse stuff happens at sea. Those containers really aren’t that stuck to the ship… Lots of those get lost. And in the future, many more will get lost. Normally, with 6 containers high, you only need a 6 beaufort wind to lose them. Nowadays they are designing 10,000-container vessels, storing them 7 or 9 high. You can imagine how many that ship will lose 😀 And it won’t be my fault!

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2052792
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Mr Jonesy would be banned from NCIG, the moderators over there are real pain-in-the-ass-guys (Talwar is going his own way, thinking his own doctrines and even finding his own uses of certain weapons :rolleyes:, the other one Anaconda isn’t saying anything, only when there’s something about Russian Navy )I mostly stay out of that section too, it’s quite boring, there’s no traffic whatsoever, but the Archive of older topics is quite good.
    Tom and Eric probably wouldn’t mind, they are quite busy on the Wingy-thingy stuff, haven’t seen them in the Naval section.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Status #2066420
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    No, it’s not CG, it’s from the real ship, with the real radars etc. No helicopter in Tartarstan iirc.
    I’ll take a look if I can find any pictures.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Status #2066441
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    depends on what you need it for. I have no pictures at this moment, but I do have a movie of the ship, showing the inside, the OSA-MA system that is preparing to launch, a SSM launch (albeit at Moskit launch from probably a Tarantul III corvette, but it’s spectacular nonetheless) etc. Maybe you can take screenshots?

    in reply to: Modern Russian AshMs #2052858
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    If you want the real scale of Granit:
    http://submarine.id.ru/galery/t847.shtml
    Not Air-Launched though. Would be too heavy for most aircraft.

    in reply to: General Discussion #408893
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    All my love Anna

    That was not directed to me, Crack, there goes my heart.
    BTW, I told you the *******s were looking at me and my camera. I could only take this picture when we were taking-off with our BAF Embraer. Same in Portugal… Had some C-130s and Puma helicopter from the plane…

    in reply to: One dead in Russian sub 'blast' #2066475
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Oh, yes Kursk was certainly built somewhere in the ’60ties…

    in reply to: General Discussion #409631
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Here it is. I’ve seen one land too, the guys were watching me and my cam…
    And of course, us and the Anti-flash equipment :diablo:

    in reply to: Putin about new Russian "nuclear missile" #2052971
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    The SSBNs are quite ok. 1 Typhoon with 10 SS-N-20. 1 Typhoon for testing Bulava. 7 Delta IV of which all are quite well trained and kept (16 missiles each). And several Delta IIIs, of which one did a launch last week and of which some others serve to do satellite launches, which is of course equally good as a real firing of Ballistic missiles.

    in reply to: General Discussion #409900
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Nearly died a 30 times on my trip with the LPG carrier. Most dangerous one was sitting on top of a 4 or 5m high temperature exchanger (a part of a compressor, to make the gas liquid again) The thing is cilindrical, so standing on it was no sinecure, when that ship starts rolling, it becomes quite dangerous, certainly when you’re working with grease and the place is full of rust and obstacles, hence you’re 99% sure, that when you fall, you will break your neck or skull and other parts.
    Little detail, we (bosun and me) were changing a 50kg (100lbs) salt water pipe, that again was corroded and leaked. Hence our balance wasn’t that great.

    in reply to: General Discussion #409902
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    aargh, there goes my chance, Windows 98. Stay with the MSN Messenger then…

    in reply to: Russian attack capabilities #2053032
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Hmm, well indeed it’s not accurate. Yet, the US GPS codes are different. They rule EVERYTHING. Also the Civil part. They just change the frequencies, by which some receivers don’t receive the right times.
    So, for a weapon, it could be sent to a completely different place, and hence not find its target anymore.
    Pretty much like the example my teacher gave, a ship in the Gulf could get the coordinates of the Artic… Same would apply for the missile.
    Yes, probably, if they gave it Glonass guidance in the beginning, it would be more accurate nowadays.

    in reply to: General Discussion #410201
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    bad bad bad rain in here. Forecast says SNOW tomorrow!!

    in reply to: what is the "best" high endurance SSK #2066517
    Severodvinsk
    Participant

    Hmm, I think I’ve seen a picture of Sub-Harpoon inside Walrus (in KIJK, I know, very basic mag, but excellent pictures 😉 and interesting stories if you’re not interested in the real details )

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 514 total)