Any group of modern ships with systems like Aster and other weapons can be very well protected enough to warrant a powerful anti ship missile like Granit. If you are defending youself no calibre is too big as long as you can use it effectively.
Good one.
And that is what I call a perfect set-up for AEGIS. The illuminator will not limit the system. It can attack the missile with 2-3 SM2. Wait for the result kill the next.
Won’t it? I do think it will. 10 seconds for each illuminator, means you can only take 3 missiles each 10 seconds with a Burke. That also means you have to have all the missiles in the air already. Otherwise the time taking for 3 missiles will be much more.
And as Gary said, these things are supersonic. It’s assumed that the high flying Granit can go up to Mach 2.5, the lower ones at Mach 1.5. If they were subsonic I would somewhat believe your statement, but with these missiles I don’t. If there are about 50 of them coming your way…
Jonesy’s point on this is a good point, how long it takes for one Granit to replace the other I don’t know. That’s probably beyond our scope too, since we don’t know the reaction time of those missiles on the kill of the high-flying one, we don’t know how fast it can climb, etc.
Another question for Jonesy, the NSM, You will somewhat need an off-board targetting too… How are you otherwise going to know what the coordinates for your GPS guidance will be? I don’t think Skjold can find a surface ship 160km away. And I’m sure you know it can’t. So, again you’ll need a helicopter/Plane to find these ships. It’s not a direct targetting, but nonetheless you have to find your targets and by this, give them again an indication that they are found and that a strike might be inbound. It might be a broad seeker too, but don’t you think that by its slow speed, the target might have already vanished when the missile reaches the site? If for example your target is a Skjold type, going at 60kts… Kind of the same problem of TASM if you ask me. Unless, of course, that seeker is a very broad angled one…
you want to put 10 extra weapons in it? Then the thing ‘ll get much bigger. And of course that speed doesn’t really matter, since when you are going at 30kts to your target, they’ll hear you quite well. Normally the supersilent speed of a SSN is 3-5kts, then there is a rather silent mode, for LA class up to 15kts,I think for SeaWolf that’s 20kts, but all that’s faster than these will make the sub very noisy. If your opponent has an SSN around, your AAW ships won’t be able to do much about that… And the SSN will definitely hear you when you try to run away.
I don’t think that’s Amur’s role anyway, you are giving Amur the Oscar SSGN role in your proposal. It’s not meant to do that, better to send some Su-30MKIs with Brahmos in there, that’s much more flexible and you can give them a better cover with additional AAW planes.
(sorry, NR-1 is the smallest nuclear sub, albeit a research sub)
I suppose you want at least 30° difference in bearing between your ship and the missile you fired. Otherwise it would still give them a rather good idea where you are.
I think you haven’t really read the thread did you Stefan? Most Granits fly low, only a single one is up. As long as those low missiles stay there, they’re safe. You might get a good assumption that they are there, but you won’t see them, neither will you be capable of engaging them. Neither do you know the number of coming missiles, unless you have that E-2C up, but then you need the carrier again… And even then, i don’t think the SM-2 is that much of great low-altitude attacker at such long ranges…
And before you ask, when the high flying one is shot down, indeed the second one climbs up.
It is possible, look at the Rubis SSN, it’s the smallest around. Yet the big question is: How effective would this be? A Nuclear submarine needs to have some endurance, stores etc. for several months. Rubis has a very light weaponload, smaller than some SSKs. So, if it would be doing a merchant hunting campaign it would need to go back several times for reloading. For food etc. it’s probably the same. By limiting its size, you reduce the endurance of a sub and what’s the advantage of a small nuclear sub with limited endurance compared to a cheaper SSK? Indeed, Nothing… (except that it can stay submerged for a longer time, but that’s quite a minimal advantage compared to its much higher price.)
SSN9? A submarine?
Or the Malakhit missile? If the Malakhit missile, it’s used by the Charlie II submarines and Nanuchka missile craft. It’s somewhere between Exocet and Harpoon in performance.
Yes for 2017 I heard. Yet a month later, Kuroyedov denied every report on that and said they would be going for littoral warfare, new frigates and corvettes. Now he’s saying again a carrier after 2010? I’d say kick that man’s butt. What a policy they have, changing every two weeks..
I suppose both? Japanese forces are very capable, having their own superb SSKs and lots of ships with ASROC, several helos and of course Orions. I think they’re very capable in this field. And the Chinese subs aren’t exactly top-notch either.
It could also be luck. There is a fire-exercise area of the Japanese navy very close to that area… The Chinese/Korean sub could have been sent to spy around there. And of course the detecting ships could have been involved in the fire exercises too. I don’t know the exact coordinates anymore, but I think it was near Okinawa, a bit north of Sakishima. It was marked by a point, with a circle with a radius of approx 37miles around it. I suppose that makes just enough space for ASROC launches? and of course live firing of the guns. So, the Japanese submarines and planes might have been involved in exercises in that area. And by good luck discover the submarine?!
I think a lot of Granit’s weight is preserved, it has 750kg of explosives, the seeker, engine and Body left. Its launch weight is 7t, so probably some 2 or 3t of that is left when it comes in.
Hmm Corvettes and frigates, that’s all a matter of designation, back in the days a frigate was 1,200t, now it’s 3 or 4,000t (the weight a destroyer was before). Zeven provincien is a frigate… Although it should indeed be said that the small ships have increased weaponry. But that mostly gives them 8 SSMs instead of 4 and RAM instead of some guns.
Huh? Jonesy what are you talking about? It is agreed to have one missile ABM system for each party. US chose not to have any because they had a two-type-missile defence, Spartan and Sprint. Hence they removed the system because the components couldn’t work whithout the other. Russia didn’t, they chose to keep one type of ABM missile, and that only around their capital. The status of this system is doubtful though. And what makes you conclude that really is an ABM site? I could identify that LPG-tanker, but I can’t see any missiles, radars or other stuff here, except for some very weird shapes and a nice roadsystem. Could be piece of land prepared for a new village 😀
logically the designer of the weapon would prefer that the high KE is used to puncture the ships steel/composite and explode inside the ship for maximum damage. even if it doesnt hit the turret it would maim enough people in the ship to make it useless.
Of course, but even with 50% of its crew a warship can still be active… By Going through i meant, going through without exploding… I mean that is 12-16m (beam of the target) of flight, if your weapons is going at 700m/s, it has to explode on impact, well a very tiny bit afterwards then. I think it’ll be hard to get that right.
Yeah Garry, a merchie ship isn’t an easy target as you think. The engine room isn’t a garanty for killing it either. It’ll have no propulsion anymore it won’t be sunk. The merchant ships are built to surivive two fully flooded compartments. Engine room included. Even trying to explode an LPG carrier might be hard. It has inerted spaces all around the tanks and liquid gas doesn’t really burn, only the fumes would ignite.
As for a supersonic weapon, indeed it might have a better chance for doing so, because a subsonic one probably won’t get through the inerted spaces. The supersonic one might, by its kinetic energy, get into the tank and explode. Yet this is only one single type, the most dangerous (a large LPG-carrier is about as strong as 2 Hiroshima nukes when it explodes)/vulnerable type of ship. A large Bulkcarrier will probably not even feel the impact of a Granit, only when it strikes a vulnerable part maybe, but considering the ship only has about the last 30m of its 200-300m length as vulnerable, that chance is small. Yeah I’m safe when you come in my area 😉 . I can survive this hit, yet you won’t survive a collision with these ships. I always wondered what a warship would do when we went straight at them…
How very silly of me – the weapon is 4500kgs of solid steel isnt it? A little peashooting RAM wouldnt make a dent!. Perhaps your forgetting about the slightly vulnerable control surfaces, seeker electronics, fuel tank etc, etc?. Plus everyone always talks about the massive kinetic energy that these antiship weapons store up on their flight. What kind of energy release are we talking about IF a RAM happens to physically hit the inbound weapon?.
As for Jonesy, Gary’s correct on that. It’s of course not a full 4.5tons of steel, yet if you Consider your RAM-Granit case, the mass of RAM is quite impuny compared to the mass of Granit, hence it will probably not stop the missile. As I already said here, if a Styx (albeit lucky) survived a hit of an OSA-MA, a missile comparable to SeaSparrow, and still hit its target, a RAM will probably not stop Granit either. I also have said that the vulnerable parts are protected by titanium, I suppose these include the fuel tank and maybe parts of the seeker…
Seahawk, did you miss the point? Supersonic for missiles does not at all mean it’s straight flying, as I said earlier the Moskit does sharp-S-shaped turns before it blows into its target.
Can’t be the radar either, since we had two of them, both in use back then, both giving same result… Was inside the Japanese waters. (eek, they were jamming us)
She seems to have changed her paintscheme quite some times. Or is it all play of the light?
Here’s Hamina and the other one is Helsinki, her ancestor. From Jane’s recognition guide. Info is rubbish though, Six Saab RBS-15F missiles? I only see 4, and no possibility to get any more on that… And it only mentions Hamina as the sole unit. One good notion though: On Helsinki, you can see the sextuple Sadral launcher, in the same position as I expect it to be in Hamina.