Well it´s hard, unless you get to airside. Then it´s all glass. A bit smoked but allows nice pics. I´ll check if there´re good viewing points. But I am affraid not. In the other terminal, you have a kind of shopping mall at San Fernando which allows nice views from the incoming planes, and a perimetral road, in which police are always watching. They are normally friendly but not at the moment.
Flight back was a bit more turbulent. Why always night flights from America to Europe are usually bumpy?. Service suspended for three times, and unconfortable trying to sleep……:confused: We arrived an hour before our schedule time 😀
Unfortunately one person killed. Although the parking lot had been evacuated, he was sleeping into his car, as he was waiting for someone from a delayed arrival. 🙁
I expect huge damages. This goverment thought they could negociate with ETA, and this is the end of the truce. As far as ETA is concerned, this thugs usually call before, and there´s no casualties. In this case, three policemen slightly wounded. Some planes are circling waiting for instructions to land. Don´t worry, there´s no danger in Spain, at least ETAs.
I have always wondered, why should taxpayers pay for something which is the goverment duty. In the UK, some airports are private, but in Spain where all bellong to the state, this measure wouldn´t be really popular.
Protecting an airport, is the same to protect a street, an embassy, a shopping centre, and so on. Police is part of the state, and paid by people taxes. So why should airports be different?.
I don´t know what happens in a private one, if police are private or goverment dependant. I hope you could clarify this point. I think it´s a bad move for an airport which has been fighting to attract new airlines, and that´s a bit unnecessary.
Safety costs shouldn´t be paid directly by the passengers. It should be raised by inderect ways (landing taxes, parking fees, even lease of the airport premises). I wonder if passengers are responsible for the safety costs.
I hope Easyjet A319s are not as cramped as Iberia ones……terrible pitch. I small, well about 1,74 and have substantial difficulties in placing my legs when seated.
I don´t mind subsidies as long they help the local community. When the people´s money helps to the region development it´s fine. I don´t like when it helps to harm other regions, areas, airports and so on, or when it´s used as a weapon in a huge chess match.
I don´t know what it happens in the UK, but in Spain there´re lots of regional quarrels and competence for new operators. And fights are usually nasty. Airlines, make a good use of this parrochial quarrels to be the tools of one airport against the other.
It means, the airport A will pay what airlines want for not to fly to airport B. Airlines know that and play the same game.
I used to like Easyjet, I don´t like them now. I have seen how they came to a “council”……and said
-How much do you give us for a flight between a and b?.
-NONE….the officials said.
-So we go to the neighbours to tease you…..
So no EASYJET any more. I understand and defend subsidies, but only when the local authorities offers them to the airlines. No this kind of begging and then using the airline to punish the airport which hasn´t accepted their proposals. Undecent at all. Sorry for my oppinion.
Yes true. In any case, I want to see what FR will be doing here next next season. If they had planned to announce a SCQ-DUB route, I wonder if they will launch it anyway despite the number of passengers here is limited. I am looking forward to sampling Aer Lingus. Never flew on them.
I suppose they will be using A320 for the route or any Avro/bae from City Jet maybe?
Clickair´s only concern now destroying Vueling as much as they can. The usual stuff. Iberia can´t compete, and has a troublesome staff of pilots who don´t want to match Vueling working conditions so as a move to threaten them, IB CEO opens Clickair to transfer flights from the main branch. There´s mounting anger in Iberia pilots headquarters and don´t rule out another strike soon. Too many emergencies in Clickair which uses old ageing Iberia A320……so I don´t really see them making a MAD-EDI for the moment. But one never knows in this “funny” country
As soon as they get Vueling out of the way, clickair will close down.
The flight to Madrid is a risky move. All previous attempts were not really successfull for two main reasons. Not enough business people, not enough tourists out of peak season. In any case, good luck for the route.
More fresh news. Spanish goverment ministers working on sunday. Woww, I am impressed. Press conference by Mrs Magdalena (our minister of transport) and some questions by media.
-Did the goverment considered the airline unsafe?
-No, the life of the passengers were not in danger. But we had detected some irregularities in their procedures…..
-Couldn´t had it been solved by a fine and keep them flying?
….uhhh, not definite answer…..well, what we have to say is that we did what we had to….
Did the Spanish officials acted just after seeing the video?. I have flown in this particular plane, and looked inmaculately. It doesn´t matter who shabby is a cabin, if avionics, structure, engine….are in good shape. Stinks in Denmark….well sorry in Madrid. How I see the whole thing?. Let´s share the responsability.
-Iberia wanted to get rid of the airline and the goverment made the very best to do it.
-The CEO has acted foolishly for not foreseen the success of the airline and increase fleet to cope with the huge numbers of flights. Despite the goverment is responsible, it´s a wise but inmoral move, to shut it down, and reopen the airline after restructuring.
-Passengers?. Well not really. However delays in the airline are well known, and most of us prepare to risk if we pay less than 400 euros for an intercontiental flight.
Should the SPanish citizen assume the cost of the charter flights for solving the caos?. Not so sure.
Until yesterday Spanish aviation authorities said that safety was fine with Air Madrid, then in a few days……the video (I can´t insert hundreds of pics of Iberia interiors with the same sort of faults) and they change the mind. Airline maintenance is made in Air France Industries, so appart from the “anecdotic video”, there were no real reasons for concern.
Do you remember Laker Airways and the dirty tricks for years by goverment and BA?. Well, don´t think these are things from the past…..NO monopoly still happens in Spain. Power and Iberia which dominates goverments, media and all mechanism are the same thing. The first longhaul low cost in Spain (and successfull) which had dared to attack Iberia main markets (southamerica) can´t be tolerated.
Since the beginning lots of burden, media campaigns and “ficticious” faults in maintenance. I wonder why any other aviation board in the countries they flew didn´t ever find any irregularities. Just closed down for delays (due to their lack of fleet). I wonder if an Ministry of Aviation can close an airline for their operating procedures. I have always thought that aviation boards were to tackle with security…..NOT IN SPAIN. They shape the market.
No intervention when Iberia employees blocked Barcelona Airport, no intervention in the great number of emergencies Clickair is having, no interventions when the Madrid New Terminal (paid with our money to favour Iberia) design make passengers to loose connections all the time….WE CAN¨T touch Iberia.
Air Madrid was a pain in Iberia ass, and the goverment has come to rescue her. I am ashamed to be SPanish today.
De nada (you´re welcome). Let´s try to load the photo again.