dark light

dan_pub

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 489 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2692463
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Ouragan from San Salvador

    in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2692473
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Even more rare: A Sambad upgraded to Sa’ar in service with the Fuerza Aerea Hondureña.

    The thing started as a Dassault SMB2, then was heavily upgraded by IAI, including replacement of the Atar engine by an A-4’s J-52.

    It soldiered through the ’67, Attrition and ’73 wars in Israel, then went to Honduras where it participated in clashes with the Sandistas and score at least one other victory there.

    in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2692484
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Argh. Sorry about the Jag. Had not seen the previous post.

    Something really offbeat and different: An IAI Arava of the Honduran AF

    in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2692495
    dan_pub
    Participant

    One from the Nigerian air force.

    in reply to: F-15S #2673034
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Any pictures of the elusive Saudi/UAE/Morracan Panther naval helicopter?

    Here you go.
    Not quite Saudi Navy, but just the neighbour on the NW.
    It’s almost the same ain’t it? 😀 😀

    in reply to: May 27, 1958 #2673604
    dan_pub
    Participant

    What’s up with the centerline fuel tank on the closest F-4?

    Looks like an F-16 wing tank to me

    in reply to: May 27, 1958 #2674266
    dan_pub
    Participant

    A long and distinguished career indeed.

    Many a ’73 soldier remembers them taking incredible risks to support the units in trouble during the opening days of the war inspite of the heavy SAM-6 and ZSU-23-4 opposition.

    Here a Kurnass in action during YKW.

    in reply to: May 27, 1958 #2674279
    dan_pub
    Participant

    An Ace

    The Kurnass has a long and distinguished career with the heyl ha avir.

    Number 222 is an ace.

    in reply to: Syrian Mig-23 #2677936
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Syrian MiG-23s

    The YKW 1973 was no fight of survival of Israel.

    This is a tall statement.
    I assume that some of us remember what happened to the population of every village overran by the Arabs, everytime they had a chance to do it. (which mercifully was only the 48 war).

    Imagine a scenario in which Syria would have won on the Golan. Do you think they would have refrained from bombing everything in sight with everything available? What was the range of their arty then ?
    Right.

    And of course, they would probably have refrained from shelling all the civilian targets, as always.

    There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that a big Syrian win would have meant the death of as many Israelis as they could possibly kill. Civilians, women, children, etc. Well maybe the women not right away…

    Fortunately their soldiers are any good only when they enjoy comfortable overwhelming numbers. As soon as the IDF reserves got up there (barely in time, but), their cowardice did the rest. The battle lasted not even 3 days.

    Syria limited its efforts to reconquer the Golan by force. The Egyptians were more restricted to a part of Western Sinai.

    Again two tall statements. Another view is that Egypt needed time to move its AAM network forward before pushing further, which they would fully have done if only they had a chance.
    BTW, when they saw an opportunity to attack further on “retreating” Israelis, they did go for it. Too bad they ended up up crushed and pushed back.
    Again, there is no question in my mind that Egypt would have talken a chance to move forward if they had won.

    And does anyone think that Syria, given half a chance, would have passed up an opportunity to avenge the Degania a/b defeats? Or, again given a chance, that they would pass up on going to the Med, having Levanon comfortably surrounded, etc? Ha!

    When the Egyptian succeeded in crossing and win some bridge-heads, the Syrians lost the time/force race by a small margin. After the first week of fighting all particpants had depleted most of their stock and were forced by this into a holding stage.

    On what planet did this hapen?
    On mine, after a week of fighting, the Syrians had been thrown back ass over head on the Golan, had abandonned scores of tanks intact, surrendered by the hundred, and were frantically regrouping to protect Damascus.

    And without the timely arrival of the Iraqi armor, they would prolly have been surrounded before that.
    Is this a “holding stage”? or regrouping after a sound defeat? Everyone can have their own opinion.

    On the south front, the Egyptian offensive of the 13th was crushed. So yeah, they got into some kind of holding mode…

    Syria had depleted most of its stock of SAM 6 and was the first to replenished by Airlift through the SU, the Egypts followed one day later. After this starts,the Israelis saw no chance to mount an offensive, without US assuarance of resupply.

    And this explains why they did NOT counter-attack, did NOT cross the Suez canal, and did NOT encircle the 3rd army. Riiiight.

    Boy, I hate to think of what would have happened if they actually had mounted an offensive…

    Both the USA and the SU were not interested in a real defeat of their clients. Two weeks of further fighting brought an Israeli crossing, when the Syrian-front was on a hold. After the armistice all participants could claim some success.

    Yes? the Syrians could? How?
    In my book, they suffered heavier losses, they ended up having been pushed back on all fronts, and they got their industrial infrastructure bombed 15 years backwards. They surrendered loads of AFVs intact, 400 POWs, etc. Exactly the archetype Arab crushing and humiliating defeat.
    But hey, maybe that doesn’t prevent them from claiming success.

    The Israeli had never the force nor the intentions to conquere Cairo or Damascus.

    Especially since it would have meant WW3.

    The Arab honor of weapons was restored in some ways, after the humilating defeat from 1967. All this opened Sadat the way to Jerusalem and regain the whole Sinai with military and economic help from the USA as surplus. Syria did not grasp this historical chance. Historical we have sofar two political winner and one looser. Egypt and Israel and the other is..? Gaddafi and his son realized just now, after the SU passing away, let us leave that dead-end way.

    This I agree fully. But I am not optimistic that Assad junior COULD grasp that chance, even if he had the brains/balls/foresight/patriotism/whatever to want it. His army and mukhabarat wouldn’t let him.

    Ahem. how did I get into that rant? I never meant to. getting old sucks, I guess.
    I’d much rather we exchanged some pictures. Here’s one of the better ones I’ve got. Anybody got any pics of Syrian MiG-23s other than the usual captured or shotdown photos?

    in reply to: Moroccan Air Force pictures #2682666
    dan_pub
    Participant

    The “Marche Verte” team, still attached

    This team performs part of their aerobatics show with all the planes tied together with ropes. Then they release the ropes and perform the rest of the show.

    This is a photo of them while still connected.
    Aren’t they wonderfully crazy? You go guys!

    (photo taken last week-end in France by a spotter who signs “JP69dsfr”)

    in reply to: Moroccan Air Force pictures #2685157
    dan_pub
    Participant

    La Marche Verte – Orange 2004

    The RMAF team la Marche verte gave a display in France last w-e.
    A bunch of froggyspotters was there and took some very nice pictures.

    This particular one is by an AF 1st officer called Mituci.

    dan

    in reply to: Moroccan Air Force pictures #2685238
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Gor a few Morrocan Mirages on my own website http://franknoort.nl/chateaudun.html

    Very nice site, Frank. Great pics!

    in reply to: lebanese mirage…..help #2686325
    dan_pub
    Participant

    please reffer to the apropriate thread in the general discussions area for my replies.

    Kfadrat,

    Congratulations for this step. Indeed we want to keep the pictures thread on topic ie pictures, and the discussions threads in the discussion area.

    Everybody is welcome to go spout off their ideas in that thread. Kfadrat’s 1st post is, er, full of strong statements and different views.

    I’m, not sure yet whether I’ll plunge into the discussion. (both side have stated their views, both have understood the other. There is no hope of coming to an agreement, so there’s not much of a point, is there?)

    Back to pictures: do you have pictures related to Syrian or Lebanese forces history that you could post, or urls ?
    I am very interested in knowing them better. Syria has been a major player in the recent history, but there is so little information known. It deserves to be better known. I assume that really old stuff (say from the 60s and 70s) is no longer sensitive anymore.

    Do you have any pictures or urls ?

    dan

    in reply to: Moroccan Air Force pictures #2686362
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Back to pictures of planes

    Here are two French-made light helos serving in the RMAF.
    They serve in the light gunship role.

    in reply to: Moroccan Air Force pictures #2686369
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Everybody is against the policy of the Western Sahara, somewhat the same policy that the Israellis do against the Palistinians. But lesser know to the world. But what strikes me most is that you call it “we” and not they.

    “European”

    Such an attitude is very interesting. ‘I don’t know what I’m talking about, but I have strong opinions, and I’ll run my mouth in absolute good conscience, and I lecture other from my moral superiority as “European”.’

    While it is cut to watch such a blissful ignorance, out of charity here are a few facts:

    The area called Ifni or Western Sahara was within Morocco before the European colonial powers carved it up between themselves in 1904-1906. Basically, France took over most of the North, and Spain took the South (plus Ceuta, Melilla, etc).
    The North recovered its independence first, and when Spain finally left, it reunited the southern provinces.

    The only reason there is a “Polisario” army is because the Algerian have been coveting the mineral resources and the access to the Atlantic. And were helped by Ghaddafi, who would not pass up an opportunity to cause trouble. It is not like there ever was a different nation or anything. Polisario is purely based in Algeria and is basically a bunch or mercs.

    But by all means continue feeling morally superior and handing out judgements like this: you are very comical, Mr self-professed “European”.

    dan

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 489 total)