dark light

dan_pub

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 489 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • dan_pub
    Participant

    Thank you Moze for the photo.

    And yes, Taris / de Lesseps monoplan 1910 is correct.
    Over to you, RAB.

    dan_pub
    Participant

    Thank you Moze.
    Please post the uncensored version of this Mercure, I don’t have this paint scheme. Thanks.

    Something older for a change 😀

    http://i42.servimg.com/u/f42/11/22/36/37/wot_2011.jpg

    dan_pub
    Participant

    Dassault Mercure?

    in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2321251
    dan_pub
    Participant

    The IL102 has to be win the ugliest jet aircraft design award surely?

    Nah. The IL-40 is a much stronger contender.

    dan_pub
    Participant

    Hmmm.
    Argentinian, but not from the FMA / Ae / Dinfia stables.
    Is it a version of a French design?

    dan_pub
    Participant

    Osirak raid?

    Correct.

    This F-16 armed for the June 7th 1981 raid to the Tammuz-1 nuclear facility was so overloaded (2xMk84 2000lb bombs, 2xAIM-9L, 2x370gal + ventral tanks) that the IDF/AF planners feared the tyres would not withstand turns with the whole weight if the plane was fully fueled.

    So the F-16s went to the end of the runway with empty tanks, and were fueled up “hot” before take off.

    Congrats, Roberto. Your turn.

    dan_pub
    Participant

    When, why

    Another quizz for when, where and why, not what.

    Why is this plane being fueled out in the open like this?
    What was happening?
    http://i42.servimg.com/u/f42/11/22/36/37/wot20112.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1064626
    dan_pub
    Participant

    You are right Moze, indeed it is the Sncaso SO-6021 Espadon.
    (And even with those massive legs it flew, reaching Mach 0.96)
    http://i42.servimg.com/u/f42/11/22/36/37/sncaso10.jpg

    Your turn, Moze.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1064726
    dan_pub
    Participant

    I wouldn’t want to be in a fuel-loaded glider either. 🙂

    Today’s quizz:
    http://i42.servimg.com/u/f42/11/22/36/37/wot20111.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1065743
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Cornelius XFG-1 fuel transport glider ?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1077726
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Percival P-56 Provost ?

    edit – oops didn’t see it was already answered.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1080054
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Dan_pub, because the lack of response to your ‘wot plane’ might be capable of being construed as ostracisation – which I am sure that it is not – I’m taking the opportunity to say that your image, even with the assistance of your clues, has me completely stumped.

    Thanks, appreciate the intent.

    … And I am sure that we are all elite in our own special areas of interest and knowledge. The same goes for the clues we employ. Despite this forum being a ‘global village’, we have to employ clues that might seem a touch parochial if these are the most appropriate way to help others to find the answer.

    This “a touch parochial” was my point.

    Oh, by the way: The photo in #4104 is Northern Israel, the Golan heights. Israeli AF S-58 helos are swooping in with airborne troops, while tanks battle below.
    This is the last days of the June 1967 6-day war, when Israel turned its sight to Syria and repaid it the past 20 years of shelling. War on this front lasted only 2 days.
    Of course, not everybody everywhere may be familiar with the topology 😀

    The point here and in the Nesher quizz was a parallel: if the thread suddenly centered on such “a touch parochial” subjects requiring knowledge of the local Israeli topography and history, it could be very enjoyable for a few, but probably it would not be much fun for many people.

    How much parochial is too much? I don’t know, it’s open to debate. But maybe we can all make a conscious effort to avoid this trap in the future.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1080078
    dan_pub
    Participant

    The answer:

    This is a member of the Mirage 5 family, seen through the entrance of a Soviet-style Hardened Aircraft Shelter.

    It is IAI Nesher serial 517, of the Israeli air force, at the Al-Fayed Egyptian airforce base, on October 24th 1973, the last day of the Yom Kippur war.

    >rather dramatic occasion
    On the last day of YKW, the Egyptian airforce made an all-out effort to support its 3rd army encircled by Sharon’s division. A large dogfight developed west of the Suez canal, and Moshe Hertz ran too low on fuel in his Nesher (IAI’s version of the Mirage 5) to return to base.
    Yom kippur war, out of fuel, over Indian country…

    >pretty unlikely circumstances.
    Two days earlier, the Israeli ground forces had overrun an Egyptian air base in Africa, Al Fayed airfield. Its runway was repaired by IAF engineers, and re-opened just 3 1/2 hours before Hertz ran out of fuel.
    He was able to land safely there.

    Al Fayed. like most Egyptian AFBs, had been equiped with Hardened Aircraft Shelters on the Soviet model after the devastating strikes of the 1967 six-days war. Hence the unique photo op.

    >what this aircraft is missing is as significant as what it has, to find the occasion.
    One of the air-to-air missiles is missing, it was launched during the mÊlÃĐe.

    >Like AA’s entry, this airplane had something to do with the African continent. Not at all in the same way as the Gull, though.
    Hertz was on CAP over the African side of the canal when he got called into this dogfight. He landed at Al Fayed –in Africa.

    >It went from a sort of cuckoo’s nest to another one.
    This Nesher took off from Refidim, the formerly Egyptian AF base of Bir Gafgafa taken over by the IDF/AF in 1967. He landed at another Egyptian AFB taken over by the IDF.

    Open house, please.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1081140
    dan_pub
    Participant

    Ok, now for the last clues:

    rather dramatic occasion, pretty unlikely circumstances.
    what this aircraft is missing is as significant as what it has, to find the occasion.

    clue 3: Like AA’s entry, this airplane had something to do with the African continent. Not at all in the same way as the Gull, though.

    clue 4: It went from a sort of cuckoo’s nest to another one.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1082911
    dan_pub
    Participant

    1st clue: rather dramatic occasion, pretty unlikely circumstances.

    New clue:
    what this aircraft is missing is as significant as what it has, to find the occasion.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 489 total)