dark light

CanberraA84-232

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 230 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ejection seat question #1235854
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    ill do some research if i can find the correct procedure for you Paul.

    im guessing youve got a Jag or Harrier cockpit there?

    in reply to: Mk5 MB Ejection Seat #1235943
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Hi all,
    Once again I am on the search for a Martin Baker Mk5 seat that was fitted to a Canadair Sabre 6 that was used by the Luftwaffe or the Airforces of the Dutch, Greek and Norweigens. Any leads would be greatly appreciated.
    The seat will be going into the RAAF Sabre A94-983 currently being restored back to airworthy at the Temora Aviation Museum.
    Thanks in advance.
    Peter

    Will you require the seat to be cold or hot?

    in reply to: jet engine servicability for ground runs ? #1235995
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    If you want to do it on a smaller scale you could build your own basic turbojet from a turbocharger, as a turbocharger is basically a centrifugal jet engine by design, it lacks only the combustor section.

    I have built a few such TJ’s now and they make for great fun, they also make plenty of noise and sound like the real thing, one engine i have made is fitted with a crude afterburner and mounted onto a kart frame, quite an exhilirating ride!

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Avon serviceability today #1236085
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    many thanks DeHavEng,

    main reason i was musing on the subject is the apparent increasing rarity of airworthy 100 series engines, particulary the mk.109

    Although i do suppose there will come a time when due to the absolute lack of any remaining engines that overhaul will become more popular

    in reply to: Rolls Royce Avon serviceability today #1236698
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    i suppose more to the point, does anyone overhaul Avons to airwaorthy condition these days?

    in reply to: Your favourite "what if" aircraft #1238576
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    CAC CA-15, very close to being the ultimate in piston engined fighters, and very much Australian, prototype acheived 502 mph in level flight.

    in reply to: Help With An Engine :) #1238848
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    I think the lack of obvious magneto mountings, doesn’t mean that there weren’t any; the gear wheel behind the sprocket, appears to be attached to a camshaft, a similar shaft is evident on the other side , but lacking a gear wheel , they would be the obvious take off points for an ignition system.

    The inlet manifold is missing,(confusing the plot) below that ,what looks like a coolant rail is in place; on top of the cylinders, the flanges may have been part of the priming system, often needed at that time.

    The engine is missing too many parts to definitively say one way or the other if it was steam driven or petrol.

    the shaft you mention is the drive end for the second camshaft, although as you say its missing its drive gear, also there are no spark plugs evideint, nor are there any apparent mounting holes for them, the overhead ramps going down into each cylinder appear to me to be the mountings for pressure relief valves, as they appear to feed directly into the cylinder chambers themselves, which would make compression for a combustion engine impossible without some sort of pressure valve.

    Also as mentioned above, the heavy use of brass and bronze parts would seemingly indicate that it spent a lot of time around either water or steam.

    in reply to: Help With An Engine :) #1239219
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Possibly a diesel ?

    Unlikely, earliest diesel engine use in aircraft was as far as im aware in the early 1930’s, diesel engine techonology was still very much in its infancy in 1908.

    Given the way this engine is set up and its complete lack of any apparent anciliary drive mountings ect, as would be needed for a magneto, its fairly safe to assume it is steam driven.

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft Wrecks in the English channel(2008) #1239498
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    ah thats jogged the memory

    SC.9 is a PR.9 with the Lightning’s AI.23B radar mounted in the nose for RedTop and other radar guided air-to-air missile tests.

    AFAIK XH132 was the one and only SC.9, its full title was Shorts SC.9

    also XH132 never officially served as an RAF machine, it was scrapped some years ago but i believe her nose was saved

    in reply to: Captions please for Vulcan at Cosford #1239500
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Hurricane snorts in disgust “Such a lot of fuss over that little thing?”

    in reply to: Help With An Engine :) #1239507
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    General setup of the engine indicates to me its steam powered.

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft Wrecks in the English channel(2008) #1239526
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Slightly off topic but why does the serial XH132 ring a bell?

    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Wasnt MH434 part of D-Day air ops?

    in reply to: What Type Of Aircraft Did You First Fly In? #1239964
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    Yes I did, and I share your sentiments……does anyone know how the repairs are going?

    Progressing was the last i heard, i would think theyll probably get a few other things done as well while she’s apart

    in reply to: What Type Of Aircraft Did You First Fly In? #1240301
    CanberraA84-232
    Participant

    to quote Monty Python’s Life of Brian “You lucky, lucky *******”, watched her giving joy rides out of Parafield a few years ago, madly jelous.

    For myself, my first ever flight was 1966 in an Auster J5 out of Shoreham (by Sea). Unfortunately didn’t note the Rego

    did you know that she suffered a belly landing a few months back?

    hopefully though we will se her back where she belongs soon

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 230 total)