If my calculations are correct then no 3584 would make it no 721 off the production line.
so would fit in the time frame.
Production of the Bf 109E-1 was delayed by problems with the DB601 engine. The pre-production E-0s were ready by December 1938, by which point complete 109E-1 airframes were being made. However the engine did not appear until the spring of 1939. This partly explains the sudden rapid appearance of the 109E in Luftwaffe service over the summer of 1939 – all that was left to do was fit the engine to the aircraft. 850 Bf 109E-1s were delivered in the first eight months of 1939, in time for the outbreak of war.
Steve101 Yes thought it was a 109E-1
http://pavlac.fr/spip.php?article230
But have now seen this and not so sure could be 109E-4
http://www.canons-skins.com/bf109/battleb.html
Block nos here.
http://www.messerschmitt-bf109.de/web.php?lang=de&auth=e&name=werknummernbloecke
Can only suggest its between 1791 -1804 or 3171 -3364
G W Smith. 23rd March 1835 – 27th Oct 1917. 82
Messrs Harrison Carter in Bull Pond Lane , a bomb from a Zeppelin damaged their premises in 1917. One casualty of this event was Mr Worthington Smith, the elderly Dunstable historian. His curiosity led him to walk from his cottage in High Street South to view the bomb crater. He caught a chill in the cold weather and this developed into an illness from which he died.
Harrison Charter were milling engineers and manufacturers of chain lubricator.
We have no information as to who picked this fragment up and where it was before it ended up in Bedford record offices. Nor how talc is written on the label.
So could TALC simply mean something like.
Transferred from Achieves of Luton Council.
Now that’s a surprise.
Norfolk farmer Tony Martin, who was arrested for the possession of a firearm in December, will face no further action, police said on Friday morning.
The 71-year-old, who served three years in prison for shooting dead Fred Barras, 16, at his home in Emneth Hungate in 1999, was arrested and bailed in connection with firearms offences after a police operation in December last year.
Police said officers, who carried out searches on Thursday December 31, “acted on credible intelligence of illegal firearms” at a property.
Mr Martin was arrested in Wisbech and taken into police custody, where he was questioned.
He was the bailed until February.
Detective Chief Inspector Andy Coller said: “Public safety is paramount and Norfolk Constabulary takes all reports of firearms seriously.
“Following the arrest a thorough search, under Section 18 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), was conducted and officers seized a firearm, which was believed to be an air weapon. However following further enquiries, it was deemed not to be a viable weapon due to its condition.”
Mr Martin was initially found guilty of murder following the shooting of Fred Barras in 1999 but this was reduced to manslaughter on appeal.
Now that’s a surprise.
Norfolk farmer Tony Martin, who was arrested for the possession of a firearm in December, will face no further action, police said on Friday morning.
The 71-year-old, who served three years in prison for shooting dead Fred Barras, 16, at his home in Emneth Hungate in 1999, was arrested and bailed in connection with firearms offences after a police operation in December last year.
Police said officers, who carried out searches on Thursday December 31, “acted on credible intelligence of illegal firearms” at a property.
Mr Martin was arrested in Wisbech and taken into police custody, where he was questioned.
He was the bailed until February.
Detective Chief Inspector Andy Coller said: “Public safety is paramount and Norfolk Constabulary takes all reports of firearms seriously.
“Following the arrest a thorough search, under Section 18 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), was conducted and officers seized a firearm, which was believed to be an air weapon. However following further enquiries, it was deemed not to be a viable weapon due to its condition.”
Mr Martin was initially found guilty of murder following the shooting of Fred Barras in 1999 but this was reduced to manslaughter on appeal.
CD It did not really matter if the Germans knew the codes were taken.
However if this raid had been successful and the British had captured the codes, on leaving Dieppe the headquarters where the codes had been, would have been set on fire and explosives set to blow the place apart.
Now when the Germans had regained control how would they know, what had been taken from that building?
Their dilemma.
The British have taken all the codes.
The British have not taken anything just destroyed the building.
If they decide on the second option and carry on sending signals, using same apparatus and codes.
Then a big plus for the British as they are reading all the signals.
If however they take the first option.
It means that they would have to implement a whole new system of signals and codes.
How long would that take to get it set up and running across all the services?
All operations working or in planning, would have to be put on hold as they would assume that the British now knew all about them, and could not risk changing the plans using the old system as they knew the British were listening.
The British would know that the Germans were setting up a new system as all the signaling which had previously gone on, and would have changed or stopped altogether.
So whichever way it went the British were on a win, win situation.
CD It did not really matter if the Germans knew the codes were taken.
However if this raid had been successful and the British had captured the codes, on leaving Dieppe the headquarters where the codes had been, would have been set on fire and explosives set to blow the place apart.
Now when the Germans had regained control how would they know, what had been taken from that building?
Their dilemma.
The British have taken all the codes.
The British have not taken anything just destroyed the building.
If they decide on the second option and carry on sending signals, using same apparatus and codes.
Then a big plus for the British as they are reading all the signals.
If however they take the first option.
It means that they would have to implement a whole new system of signals and codes.
How long would that take to get it set up and running across all the services?
All operations working or in planning, would have to be put on hold as they would assume that the British now knew all about them, and could not risk changing the plans using the old system as they knew the British were listening.
The British would know that the Germans were setting up a new system as all the signaling which had previously gone on, and would have changed or stopped altogether.
So whichever way it went the British were on a win, win situation.
As far as I can make out.
Air Defense Intelligence, set up by British Air Ministry.
To report on basically every thing to do with the air war.
And as ((K) seems to refer to only Luftwaffe, I would say that it was used to denote anything to do with the Luftwaffe.
A B C D etc would possibly refer to other reports on various systems of Air defense, such as our own radios radar etc.
Sample of A. D. I. (K) Report No. 393/1945
As far as I can make out.
Air Defense Intelligence, set up by British Air Ministry.
To report on basically every thing to do with the air war.
And as ((K) seems to refer to only Luftwaffe, I would say that it was used to denote anything to do with the Luftwaffe.
A B C D etc would possibly refer to other reports on various systems of Air defense, such as our own radios radar etc.
Sample of A. D. I. (K) Report No. 393/1945
The Programme was Supertruckers, Kings Heavy Haulage from Avonmouth, they moved it from Cotwolds airfield (Kemble) to Dysons new headquarters Malmesbury where it was hung in the canteen.
They were known as Pipe mines or McNaughton tubes.
http://sussexhistoryforum.co.uk/index.php?PHPSESSID=k81rj68u4tbd03dreoeivobv21&topic=5511.15
Survey report Bournemouth Hurn. Appears the pipes were laid, but not filled with explosives.
As a civil engineer, my father was engaged in aerodrome constructon during at least the early part of WW2. He mentioned to me that during the construction of Bournemouth (Hurn) linked chains of explosives had been buried beneath the runways and taxiways to await detonation in the event of an attempted seizure by the Germans.
He didn’t think that they had ever subsequently been lifted !
Don’t Panic John. They have been sorted, will see if I can find the file.
There’s the cast and crew, but can’t see #43.
Guess you have sobered up now then, and realised that it was a pointless question in the first place.
If you were unaware of anything happening in the channels islands during ww2.
Why did you not Google channel islands ww2 and get 175 topics on the subject in 0.35 secs?
If you require more specific information on anything please, Please make your questions more understandable. :D:D