Here at last is some info from gunston’s ‘Fedden’.
Pages 244 – 248 has information, diagrams and comparative drawings of both the Orion and a 4 row 28 cylinder 5 3/4 in bore by 7 in stroke engine.
The Orion was basically a bigger Centaurus, ie 18 cylinders in two rows of nine, 6 1/4 in bore and 7 1/2 in stroke. It was expected to achieve 4000hp.
The unnamed 28 cylinder does not appear to be a ‘corncob’ design from the diagram, it looks similar to the BMW 803 layout – ie row 3 is directly behind row 1 and row 4 is directly behind row 2. However, although it has Centaurus bore and stroke, 28 cylinders means 4 rows of 7 rather than 4 rows of nine so there is more room for the air to circulate. It is also noticable that the cowling outline is well clear of the cylinder heads – again giving more circulation room – whereas Hercules, Centaurus and Orion were (or were to be) very closely cowled.
Here are links to the drawings of the Orion, 28 cylinder engine and a couple of other interesting tidbits from ‘Fedden – The Life of Sir Roy Fedden’ by Bill Gunston. A fascinating book, I recommend it.
I apologise for the large file sizes but there is a lot of detail and some tiny printing I thought might be useful.
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n291/nsumner/PP246top.jpg
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n291/nsumner/PP246lower.jpg
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n291/nsumner/PP247top.jpg
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n291/nsumner/PP247lower.jpg
http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n291/nsumner/PP255.jpg
Obviously this is copyright material so personal use only! ๐
There was also a torpedo bomber designed by Feisler the Fi 167, it hyad incredible low speed performance and was stageringly ugly.
http://www.german-navy.de/kriegsmarine/aviation/carrierbased/fi167/index.html
I’ve contacted the Bristol Branch of the Roll Royce Heritage Trust at Filton, if and when they reply I’ll post the info here.
Another example is the improvements made to BofB outtakes by the Dark Blue World crew – ref the prop flying off the exploding Heinkel, the cascade of empty cartridge cases that the camera flies ‘through’…
OK, I’m going to display my chronic ignorance here – what outtakes are these and who are the ‘Dark Blue World crew’?
Battle of Britain is another film that might profit from some CGI magic, think of seeing the He111s and Bf109s with DB engines! We could do with modifying the long noses and double rads of the Spitfire IXs and XVIs too!
The ‘stuka’ scene is very obviously modelwork, perhaps we could even get some new air combat sequences now that so many Hurricanes are in airworthy condition – but that is probably far, far too much to hope for!
I admit to having antithetical thoughts about this… at what point does it stop being some subtle improvements and start becoming mucking about with a classic?
If the actors performances are left unchanged and the CGI followsthe original shots closely I don’t see why a new version that’s deeply respectful of the original shouldn’t be a success.
As I understand it the original Bristol Orion was a piston radial that was designed around 1942-43, I should have mentioned that I didn’t mean the 50s turboprop – sorry!
One idea Iยดd suggest for some of the classics like ‘Sink the Bismark’ and ‘The Dambusters’ is to keep the live action but re-do the special effects. Some of the model work makes old movies looks a bit creaky but replace it with modern CGI and you would have a much more accesible film while preserving the performances of the actors from the original.
Thank you gentlemen!
Thanks for the replys, at some stage though, someone must have put a figure on the cost of each aircraft, the accountants wouldn’t be happy if they didn’t!
RAFM Hendon has the two aircraft delivery ledgers and also the Aircraft Movement Cards. It does not (to my knowledge – but I’d welcome being corrected) have any material contractual records.
Hendon does or did have some contract records back in 1999 but its possible that they’ve been moved. I live in Canada but was planning a visit to the UK to research aircraft costs and emailed back and forth with them about it. (When I finally got to the UK chasing around after my family ate up all my time and I never got to do it… ๐
The primary contract ledgers are held at the National Archives in the SUPP (for Ministry of Supply) class.
That is very helpful information, thank you.
There is also useful information on contracts in Treasury files and in the records of the 3 main executive bodies responsible for RAF procurement.
I don’t mean to be a pest but you wouldn’t happen to know which treasury files? Also – who were the executive bodies responsible for RAF procurement?
Rocketeer, thanks for the pics.
I think it would have been possible to fit fuel tanks in the inner weapon stations in each wing – ie the place in a Hurricane IIC where the inboard 20mm cannon would go. In a B and C wing Hurricane this would leave space for 2 X 20mm and 4 X .303 (i.e. equivalent to Spitfire Vb armament – the Brownings being in the outer stations where B wing Hurricanes kept 2 in each wing).
This would provide space for an extra 50 – 60 gallons of fuel, raising tankage from 94 gallons to about 150, giving 6 – 6 1/2 hours of endurance (from the usual 4 1/2) the fuel and tanks would weigh less than two Hispano cannon and ammunition.
With two 45 gallon drop tanks all up fuel would be in the region of 240 gallons and with two 90 gallon drop tanks we’d have 330 gallons giving 9 1/2 to 12 1/2 hours of endurance.
If this is completely insane, it would probably be a kindness to tell me now…
I will post pix of the room under the seat of P3554 if you wish later.
That would be great if you have the time.
Many thanks.
XN923 wrote
I’d be interested to see any materials you come up with Nick, if you’re willing to share.
I certainly shall, though you might need to be patient!
Dave T wrote
Found ’em, if anybodys interested ?
I’m interested!
Thank you all!