dark light

Colonial Bird

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 603 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #370294
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    JDK- I have asked that it stop privatley for quite a while now. I will not continue to do so while things of this nature are allowed to be posted on this forum.

    in reply to: more censorship? #1941772
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    JDK- I have asked that it stop privatley for quite a while now. I will not continue to do so while things of this nature are allowed to be posted on this forum.

    in reply to: General Discussion #371456
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Nobody knows that is the reason Robbo was banned, there were plenty of other things Robbo has done. And yes, the webmaster is perfectly aware of Floods last name, and I imagine he would be smart enough to pick up on that twist on it.

    Again, Flood wasn’t even aware of it until later. Are you so unwilling to listen? Why claim to be reasonable when you won’t make any effort to see the truth? The “garvage” crap was simply Robbos’ last post. Let us not automatically assume that was the reason he was banned.

    And, by the way- Robbo had already been warned by the webmaster about his abuse. So, there goes the argument that he was banned without warning.

    I want this to end. None of you have any real case against Flood, just made up accusations and assumptions.

    By the way, Ian- it is not up to us to prove that Flood is innocent it is up to you to prove he is guilty. I thought you worked in a law firm? I’d think you’d know this.

    And get over what time of day you were banned. What, you never turn on the computer when you can’t sleep at night? And you were warned before you were banned, a couple of times. And if some mod let you in after you were banned, well thats on them. Lets hope the webmaster takes it up with them.

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942289
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Nobody knows that is the reason Robbo was banned, there were plenty of other things Robbo has done. And yes, the webmaster is perfectly aware of Floods last name, and I imagine he would be smart enough to pick up on that twist on it.

    Again, Flood wasn’t even aware of it until later. Are you so unwilling to listen? Why claim to be reasonable when you won’t make any effort to see the truth? The “garvage” crap was simply Robbos’ last post. Let us not automatically assume that was the reason he was banned.

    And, by the way- Robbo had already been warned by the webmaster about his abuse. So, there goes the argument that he was banned without warning.

    I want this to end. None of you have any real case against Flood, just made up accusations and assumptions.

    By the way, Ian- it is not up to us to prove that Flood is innocent it is up to you to prove he is guilty. I thought you worked in a law firm? I’d think you’d know this.

    And get over what time of day you were banned. What, you never turn on the computer when you can’t sleep at night? And you were warned before you were banned, a couple of times. And if some mod let you in after you were banned, well thats on them. Lets hope the webmaster takes it up with them.

    in reply to: General Discussion #371468
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    So he got Robbo banned for a lightly humorous twist on a surname?
    Are you really going to say that doesn’t display some worrying characteristics?

    Thank you, Andy. Do make an effort to have correct information before making assumptions, yes?

    The webmast banned Robbo all on his lonesome. It was not until hours later that Flood was looking at the mods forum and discovered Robbo had been banned. He had nothing to do with it. Robbo’s continued abuse and obsession with Flood got him banned.

    That is accurate, correct information. If you truly wish to be reasonable you will see that

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942300
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    So he got Robbo banned for a lightly humorous twist on a surname?
    Are you really going to say that doesn’t display some worrying characteristics?

    Thank you, Andy. Do make an effort to have correct information before making assumptions, yes?

    The webmast banned Robbo all on his lonesome. It was not until hours later that Flood was looking at the mods forum and discovered Robbo had been banned. He had nothing to do with it. Robbo’s continued abuse and obsession with Flood got him banned.

    That is accurate, correct information. If you truly wish to be reasonable you will see that

    in reply to: General Discussion #371476
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Your partner kicked it to death.
    Subtle isn’t he???

    By doing what? What exactly can any of you prove that he’s done? You spew abuse and trash about how bad he is, when you either A. Do not have correct information and B. Have simply made up his “crimes”.

    How exactly does that work?

    It’s time this ends and it’s up to you lot to end it. Grow up, or alternatively offer some proof that Flood is not suitable. And being bitter that you were banned, Ian is not proof. Sorry.

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942304
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Your partner kicked it to death.
    Subtle isn’t he???

    By doing what? What exactly can any of you prove that he’s done? You spew abuse and trash about how bad he is, when you either A. Do not have correct information and B. Have simply made up his “crimes”.

    How exactly does that work?

    It’s time this ends and it’s up to you lot to end it. Grow up, or alternatively offer some proof that Flood is not suitable. And being bitter that you were banned, Ian is not proof. Sorry.

    in reply to: General Discussion #371489
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    More abuse? AIB- what happened to trying to be the “voice of reason”??

    What proof do any of you have the mod you attack has actually done any of these things? See, it’s called innocent until proven guilty. And none of you have proven anything.

    Mods- this is another abusive attack on Flood and should be deleted. Please. What has Flood done that he deserves this?

    -Erin

    in reply to: more censorship? #1942308
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    More abuse? AIB- what happened to trying to be the “voice of reason”??

    What proof do any of you have the mod you attack has actually done any of these things? See, it’s called innocent until proven guilty. And none of you have proven anything.

    Mods- this is another abusive attack on Flood and should be deleted. Please. What has Flood done that he deserves this?

    -Erin

    in reply to: Steve Young. #1365358
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Steve Young

    My husband and I wish to extend condolences to Steve Youngs wife, Julie. I understand they were not yet married, but imagine she would prefer the title. Also to his son, our deepest condolences. We were very deeply saddened to hear of his untimely death.

    Julie- we were truly sorry to hear of Steves death. He was a great man, and no doubt would have gone on to live an extremely full life. From his activity on the forum, we know that indeed, he did live a full life. All of our good wishes to you and to Haydn.

    Erin and David Garvey

    in reply to: General Discussion #389158
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Ah, well- what can I say? Kev’s boy toy has spoken. Obviously nobody cares about the kind of person they throw their weight behind. Probably more about keeping the boys club intact than anything else; as you all join in when it’s Kev and Co. doing the talking, but are so quick to trash me.

    All right than, boys. Have your He-Man Women Haters club back. I’ve got more important things to do,anyway- though this has been fun.

    Ciao.

    in reply to: Question for Flood. #1951101
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Ah, well- what can I say? Kev’s boy toy has spoken. Obviously nobody cares about the kind of person they throw their weight behind. Probably more about keeping the boys club intact than anything else; as you all join in when it’s Kev and Co. doing the talking, but are so quick to trash me.

    All right than, boys. Have your He-Man Women Haters club back. I’ve got more important things to do,anyway- though this has been fun.

    Ciao.

    in reply to: General Discussion #389219
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Technically, Frank- it wasn’t aimed at you. I would ask why Kev and Ian were allowed to take up the discussion you had quashed without consequence, though?

    And, Kev- is it ok for Frank to be open with his moderation and discuss issues with other members- but it wouldn’t be ok for Flood to do it? Amazing, the way you apply standards-and even more amazing is how you are so quick to judge others and claim the moral high ground while conveinantly forgetting your own transgressions, and never take responsibility for your actions. Glad to know the moderators think you are such a “nice, great guy”. Otherwise you might actually be taken to task and made to answer for your actions. Sure wouldn’t want that to happen, now would we?

    And hopefully, everyone will read Arthurs post on page 1.

    in reply to: Question for Flood. #1951125
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Technically, Frank- it wasn’t aimed at you. I would ask why Kev and Ian were allowed to take up the discussion you had quashed without consequence, though?

    And, Kev- is it ok for Frank to be open with his moderation and discuss issues with other members- but it wouldn’t be ok for Flood to do it? Amazing, the way you apply standards-and even more amazing is how you are so quick to judge others and claim the moral high ground while conveinantly forgetting your own transgressions, and never take responsibility for your actions. Glad to know the moderators think you are such a “nice, great guy”. Otherwise you might actually be taken to task and made to answer for your actions. Sure wouldn’t want that to happen, now would we?

    And hopefully, everyone will read Arthurs post on page 1.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 603 total)