dark light

Colonial Bird

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 603 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #377667
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Questions are bad. Don’t you know better than to ask questions! Especially, especially, if you live in Nepal.

    in reply to: General Discussion #377768
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Well, to you. But the same would be said by other people about aviation. Or photography, or a hundred other things…

    in reply to: General Discussion #377801
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    I kinda agree with Flood. It’s one thing to do it just to do it; but when you make it such a spectacle and obviously make every effort to make sure everyone knows about it… Seems more egotistical and attention hungry to me. If she is going to draw such attention to her “deed”, my opinion is that she should attach some sort of cause to it.

    in reply to: General Discussion #377834
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Happy Birthday to the non present birthday boy!

    in reply to: General Discussion #378295
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Good. Don’t eat there. They torture their chickens.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378487
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    I saw Death in my mirror once. I was 10.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378491
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    oooh, very cool. I don’t see why not- Giant Squid and whales abound- and prehistoric sea creatures didn’t have the fatal human interaction some of their land cousins did- also, if it truly was a meteor that altered earths weather and killed off the land dinosaurs..would it have affected deep sea creatures? With my oh so limited knowledge of the subject- I’d be willing to say they are still around.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378507
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    HASH(0x8ba2354)
    You’re Mikey! Lucky you.

    Which character from “The Goonies” are you?
    brought to you by Quizilla

    I know it’s sacrilige but I never liked that movie- kids annoyed the hell out of me. 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #378623
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    What a ridiculous ploy. It really doesn’t look right; with the expressionless posture and face. I wonder if they had any real expectations with this?

    in reply to: General Discussion #378631
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    You know, Flood- it’s possible that despite your misgivings about our government and our “president” that perhaps, it was the people who really won the election. If it’s an honest election; then they chose who they wanted and the future they want for their country; for themselves. That makes them the winners; not Bush or Blair or the terrorists or anyone else. It’s about the people who live there making the choice and not having other people making the choice for them.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378648
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    I would have to ask the government officials who have implimented this decision if they would be comfortable with their own wives or daughters being forced to take up jobs within the sex industry, and if not why should anyone else be forced into it either?
    Flood

    Well, I’d have to point to my post about it being a matter of enforcing moral precendants on an entire population. How can the government decide what is morally reprehensible and what isn’t? It has to be left up to the indvidual person what they will or will not subject themselves to. I think the government would have a “right” in theory to withhold unemployment from anyone who refuses to take a job that’s available and meets their needs, however, again, in reality it is impossible because some individual people may have a moral objection to certain employment (such as brothel work); and as the government can not involve themselves in this; nor can they base their decision to withold needed monies on it, either.

    It doesn’t matter how they would feel about their wives or daughters partcipating; because they can’t make the decision based on that. Or, shouldn’t.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378714
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    Hi Gnome-

    I have a very strong opinion about government entities taking stances on morality, mainly that they shouldn’t, ever. Morality is a concept that means something different to each and every person and the government should not attempt to enforce a perceived standard on the population. As far as the sex industry (as Flood well put it) goes; it is up to a woman if she wants to sell herself and up to a man if he wants to buy “her”. The government should cast neither a positive or negative light on it whatsoever. In theory the German government should be well within their rights to cut her unemployment because she has refused employment; however the reality of the situation is that the employment does present some very real moral issues in some people and therefore that has to be taken into consideration; her benefits should not be cut.

    The problem is not that the work is no longer “morally repugnant” I think it’s more that the government has decided not to make that decision of morality for the population; therefore they see it as just another job, and she refused it. But, given that people will find it morally repugnant; as I said before; they must keep that in mind when being quick to cut unemployment benefits. As I said in my first post- it’s quite the conundrum.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378809
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    What a conundrum for the government- I imagine they should leave it up to the woman, keep the option of working in a brothel on the table; but if they refuse- it shouldn’t impact their unemployment at all.

    Unemployment is a funny thing. Here in the states you get a certain amount of unemployment after it’s gone it’s gone. If you can’t get a job you’re SOL. If you lose your house, car and end up on the streets, to bad. It’s sad. It isn’t right. You work for so many years, pay your taxes- but in the end it doesn’t matter.

    in reply to: General Discussion #378815
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    I don’t think I’ve ever had a baked potato that wasn’t cooked in the microwave 😮 I did come across a recipe for “jacket potatos” that required oven cooking, though. I saved it for later use. Unfortunatley it takes a good 2 hours to cook- involved seal salt or rock salt or something and looked delicious. The chili con carne, Danohagan, sounds awful :p I’m more of a butter, cheese, sour cream person myself!

    in reply to: General Discussion #378894
    Colonial Bird
    Participant

    I agree, Sauron- let’s hope the right people were elected to do the right job.

    The important thing, however is that they had a choice. Hopefully they’ll never let anyone take that away from them.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 603 total)