dark light

TooCool_12f

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,094 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2087942
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    The 2008 evaluation was done with a “D” not a “C”, a heavier aircraft that carries a bit less fuel.

    like all other contenders… obviously, nobody has allowed a swiss pilot to fly alone in their aircraft. The only one not to do it in a twin seater is the F-35 in this second competition, as there’s no twin seat F-35… how the swiss will evaluate that remains to be seen

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2088297
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    Gripen C and Gripen E are different jets with different ranges. Especially the advertised ranges for the Gripen E (even Gripen C for that matter) should suffice for the Swiss boundaries.

    Unless Saab has been using clever PR to advertise some range that doesn’t match up in real world scenarios.

    problem is that ferrying range has little to do with operational requirements.. if you have to catch a liner cruising at high subsonic Mach @35000ft, you have to go full afterburner on runway and up to the interception point… Gripen could not… and that is a fact proven during trials

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2092979
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    oui, enfin, c’était ce qui était prévu en 2014

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2093220
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    the average is not spread among the “50% available”, it is the average for the entire fleet…

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2093277
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    In 2016 it was reported by the French air Force that a Rafale was flying (in average) 275 hours/year
    That would mean that the cost of each flight hour is about 15,000 Euros€€€, which is consistent with what we usually read.

    275 hours per plane in 2016, but the cost we see here is in 2018… we can imagine that the number of flying hours is similar, but it is said nowhere

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2093363
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    Cost of Rafale maintenance (all versions mixed) : 4.15 M€ / plane /year

    https://www.capital.fr/economie-poli…le-1343688?amp

    it’s crazy that nobody explained to the so-called journalist that such a number has zero meaning… 4.15M for what use? how many hours? if it flew 10 hours on average, the cost is huge.. if it flew 1000 hours for that much, its a bargain… how many hours have all the Rafales flown in 2018?

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2094271
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    still it was too big for the gripen… :p

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2094285
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    perhaps you should change your name from Too Cool to Too Triggered ROFLMAO

    yeah, I know, those pesky little things called facts… :highly_amused:

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2094372
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    funny when you think about it.. a guy comes here saying switzerland is tiny and any fighter would suffice, yet, in the last trials, a Gripen managed to be bingo fuel before succeeding to intercept a simulated liner over swiss territory.. go figure… I guess the pilot should’ve passed on keypub boards, prior to the test, so that some posters explain to him that any fighter would do it :highly_amused:

    in reply to: Franco-German next generation fighter #2094375
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-22_Raptor
    There is a reason the similar size Raptor comes along with an empty weight of >19 tons.

    yes, but we are talking about a fighter to enter service half a century after the Raptor.. might be they have some ideas about ways to achieve what they want in a certain weight class, no? 😉

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2094778
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    basically, what some here were saying for ages… with the F-35 your politicians are promised (or so they say) ,to receive a share of work for buying the aircraft, and in the end, you only get a “chance” to participate as a bidder for shares…

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2095490
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    if the Swiss people keep rejecting a new fighter purchase (why wouldn’t they, they are surrounded by very powerful close allies, they’re not worried about invasions), then Switzerland will end up with an obsolete air force until at least 2030
    but if the military can buy a fleet of UCAVs at a fraction of the price to fulfill the intercept role at a fraction of the operational cost, I imagine the Swiss people would be willing to support that, it’s not that different from buying missiles
    100 UTAP-22s would cost $200 million, even with (minimal) training and support equipment cost that’ll be a fraction of the $8 billion needed for a manned fighter purchase
    that’s 100 reusable cruise missile that can do recon, drop bombs, escort air intruders
    or if you put Stingers or Sidewinders on there, they’ll pose a serious threat to any aircraft, if only because they can be launched from literally anywhere and don’t use radar, making them very hard to see coming, like a SAM

    in addition as technological evolution speeds up, it’ll be possible to upgrade even obsolete F-18 and F-5 at fraction of the cost with the latest technology and weapons
    for example the Marines are upgrading their F-18Cs with AESA radars (for about $3 million each), as well as extending their service life, meant to keep them operationally relevant until 2030: https://www.military.com/defensetech/2019/01/22/marines-classic-hornet-jets-get-upgraded-radar.html
    alternatively there’s the Malaysian upgrade program for about $2 million per F-18 that’s said to put them on par with the F-18E/F: https://www.nst.com.my/news/exclusive/2017/07/260429/more-lethal-sting-rmafs-hornets
    $5 million to get $70 million worth of ability for 10 years is a good deal

    the UTAP-22 would cost as little as $2 million, essentially flies itself (so minimal cost for pilot training and ground control station) and has a flight envelope similar to an F-16 without an afterburner
    payload is small but still enough for a pair of SDBs or Sidewinders, which also makes sales much easier legally speaking (they’ve been pre-approved by Congress to all major US allies) so delivery could take place as soon as next year probably (if there’s room in Kratos’ production schedule, the USAF probably ordered a few hundred already)

    once again: there is NO suitable UCAV for swiss needs, zero, nada… period.. forget it

    you can buy a bunch of Cessnas 172 for a fraction of the cost of the UCAVs and they would be just as useful..

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2096621
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    It’s not like Rafales are going to be needed for any real combat role anyway when there’s F-35s in theatre, not for the first week or so. Rafales can play once the far more capable aircraft which aren’t already obsolete kick the door down for them.

    obviously french air force does not agree with you, but, hey, what would they know, eh?

    in reply to: Finnish fighter replacement revisited #2098005
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    as I replied there: with much greater effectiveness, and at a fraction of the cost

    and I answered it as well… it doesn’t work that way 😉

    in reply to: Swiss Air Force combat fighter competition 2.0 #2098007
    TooCool_12f
    Participant

    as for actually helping lost aircraft, I doubt most pilots are fluent in sign language, so most of this is limited wobbling your wingtips as a sign to follow me, something a drone can do perfectly well?

    er, it’s part of a pilot’s formation, for one, and secondly making a drone capable of fighter aircraft performance, and equipped to handle such situations means making a fighter aircraft with serious upgrade in computing power on board.. it’s cheaper to buy fighter aircraft as such… 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,094 total)