again, we agree, but is it Dassaults fault if Indias acquiring process takes ages? They will gladly sell aircraft to India, but they can’t do so (nobody can, for that matter) under any terms.. If india asks to do things in a way it can’t be done, or a way that is unacceptable for any manufacturer (for example, asking that Dassault takes the whole responsibility for anything that happens, even if it’s entirely HAL’s fault) things obviously take time. The major problem for India is that their fighter fleet is slowly shrinking as months pass by, while Dassault lives from its bizjets, has French orders to keep it busy on the Rafale on a gentle pace, and can afford to loose several more years if India drags its feet too long. Now some, in India, complain it takes too long… they should think first before pointing fingers 😉
guys, you’re still living in 1940’s…
putting foreign precision weapons on a modern fighter without source code is something you simply can not do… if India was able to adapt Israeli and Russian weapons on mirages on short notice, it is quite obvious that the French allowed it (meaning did what had to be done so that the weapons could be integrated into weapons systems of the aircraft)
what’s more, citing falklands conflict as a “proof” that french aren’t reliable works both ways.. UK are a very close ally of the French, so one may argue that they do actively support their allies in need…
again (it’s in my previous post:
The main reason for the high serviceability of the Mirage-2000 fleet, I am told, is the near instant availability of spares and technical support from the French Dassault and the Thales team
no, obviously no support…
evidence, you can have plenty, there are just a couple of articles you can find:
http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-view/feature/132379/why-rafale-won-in-india.html
The Indian Air Force also is a satisfied user of long standing of French fighters, going back to the Dassault Ouragan in the 1950s. It was also particularly appreciative of the performance of its Mirages during the 1999 Kargil campaign against Pakistan, and of the support it then obtained from France. During that campaign, India obtained French clearance – and possibly more – to urgently adapt Israeli and Russian-supplied laser-guided bombs to the Mirages, which were thus able to successfully engage high-altitude targets that Indian MiG-23s and MiG-27s had been unable to reach.
http://www.idsa.in/node/8531/3452
One of the reasons the IAF favoured this fighter, besides intrinsic merit, is its experience with the Mirage-2000 fighters acquired in 1984-85. The Mirage was used first in the opening phase in Sri Lanka. Later the Mirage also proved its superior technology during the 1999 Kargil conflict when the small enemy targets at high altitude could not be successfully engaged with other strike fighters. The Mirage-2000 fleet has maintained a very high serviceability and utilisation rate and above all an unbelievably envious flight safety record. It is hoped that the Rafale would prove equally effective and economical in the long run. The main reason for the high serviceability of the Mirage-2000 fleet, I am told, is the near instant availability of spares and technical support from the French Dassault and the Thales team, and a state of the art avionics laboratory in Gwalior that is more sterile than the best hospital’s Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
other questions?
we agree on that, but what I wanted to underline is that any eventual delay is mostly due to them… if they really wanted the Rafales now, the French would be able to provide them (and as was said a number of times before, Dassault without any modification to its structure could build as much as 24 aircraft per year if needed (for more, they’d need to enlarge their facilities). It’s mostly about the India’s will to build in India and their cash availability.
what’s funny is that IAF needs aircraft now, and then people complain about delays… Should India ask for it, France would gladly let Dassault switch completely to India’s aircraft right now (which would save a few billions to the french defence budget for the time being), and allow India to start receiving its first Rafales almost immediately
next we’ll read from our “russia-friendly” posters is that the PAK-FA flies in orbit, shooting intergalactic missiles on unsuspecting targets…
for now, it’s pretty much like the F-35, a work in progress… how it will fare against a Rafale is anyone’s guess… too bad that people who thoroughly tested a multitude of aircraft ended up with results not meeting “russia’s da best” wet dreams…
As for our friend saying that India can’t count on support from western nations in case of war, you should look into Kargil conflct and the support India received from Dassault… From what I’ve read, it was simply top notch, exactly the opposite of what you said, mate… 😉
Lastly, don’t label me with those who make unreasonable claims about the F-35 being able to outperform x or y. It is what it is, a strike fighter. What aggravates me, are blanket statements about F-35 performance that are untrue, or flatly absurd like this : “you have G limitations, acceleration limitations… you name it, it has it… just like every modern fighter, only lower…”
Absurd when they quote US officials stating they had to lower the requirements below what’s used on others because it couldn’t match them?
On one thing we agree, it’s a strike fighter… and being a lesser A2A performer than latest fighters that are more targeted at air to air roles shouldn’t be a surprise, what’s so complicated to understand there?
must be great for the pilot to have the aircraft suddenly pull maximum emergency G’s without ever telling him to sit straight or anything… I thought the fabulous SA in the F-35 would give the pilot the ability to know he’s being shot at as soon as it happens… giving him “plenty of time” to react…
As the missile will take some time to arrive, I’m pretty sure any pilot will prefer to be alerted and have the possibility to maneuver by himself in order to get out of there in one piece
–Off Topic–
In case of India, so far we are avoiding a conflict but Chinese are provoking us directly (incursions) and indirectly (passing nuclear & missile technology to rouge states in our neighbourhood). Chinese must not push India to wall where India has no choice but hit back.Alliances with Japan, Vietnam, deploying missiles, planes and special offensive forces on east border are indicators that we are getting frustrated with Chinese aggression, their ever changing positions, demands, borders and no movement on settlement issues.
I don’t know about FR, US or others but India will seriously consider to help Taiwan if we receive any such request via proper channels.
rkumar, India is a special case, as they already have somewhat “cold” relations with China… I talk about manufacturers of countries who all hope to get billions of deals with China, and don’t want chinese to get upset about that…
Now, providing India ends up signing with the French, and should the French give them the ability to sell on the Asian market, then, they may eventually propose Rafales to the Taiwanese, where the French may play dumb saying “India does what they want with their technology”… but the Rafales made by Dassault most certainly won’t ever be sold to Taiwan. The only eventual “french” possibility may be the sale from UAE of their Mirages (quite modern, to say the least) as they buy Rafales… where the French would be outside partners, but even that, I’m not sure the French would accept,
@ Toocool_12f
So here’s my posts on the f-35 (find one piece where I’ve made an unsubstantiated claim, other than an opinion): then shall we look at your claims?
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2106972#post2106972
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2097764#post2097764
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2100104#post2100104
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2100875#post2100875
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2094937#post2094937
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2094533#post2094533
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2094744#post2094744
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2094806#post2094806
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?126622-F-35-News-Multimedia-amp-Discussion-thread-(2)&p=2094449#post2094449Here’s some of your informed commentary:
“it has higher wing loading than the F-104… (not to speak of eurocanards or, if you prefer US references, any more or less modern US design). Somehow, I have some difficulty associating that “feature” with an aircraft supposedly considered as a “good dogfighter”…”
“considering that as of today the F-35 isn’t even cleared for combat, it is inferior to an F-4… the only thing we have now are promises by LM…”[/I]Well done……
Before you go popping off about doing research on claims about F-35 performance… do yourself a favor and do some yourself. Thanks
wing loading, just look for data (dimensions, weigth, any high schoolar can calculate that), it’s pretty clear (and don’t come back with some BS like “the whole fuselage counts”… )
as for “not cleared for combat”, well, it’s exactly what the commander of the first Marine squadron stated little before I posted that, simply copying him, when they received the aircraft at the time, and as the flight domain had not been cleared yet (in fact, it may very well be that even today it still isn’t cleared completely), it flew pretty much in gentle curves at most, by clear weather and not for too long as the system would need to be rebooted… but you obviously know better than him… try something else next time, “expert”…
FBW, his claim is fully supported by plenty of reported data in this very thread… all you need to do is read it… it’s been posted and if you really want to know, do your research yourself. Asking repeatedly for the same data all over again until the other guy gets fed up of loosing his time on research just for you to reask for the same “proof” some 10 pages later again, gets a bit boring. You have G limitations, acceleration limitations… you name it, it has it… just like every modern fighter, only lower…
thing is, nobody wants to get on bad terms with the chinese… so, be it french, american or other jets, taiwan has little chance to find anybody willing to sell
well, yes and no… when your currency goes down, usually there’s the inflation that goes with it. As all prices move up (for imports at least) you can’t claim a price increase for a single item as in real value it hasn’t moved all that much.
@ Sanem, a Phalanx turret weighs over 6 tons alone… add the weight of supporting structure, ammunition, and you get an aircraft that would have to be bigger than a 747 to carry it
Dassault assemble 11 Rafale a year. What is your source giving their cost as more than a a billion Euro?
might be wrong, but seems to me that a unit price was somewhat above 100 million, so, for 11 aircraft that would be about 1.1 bn euros