dark light

Stepwilk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 515 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #926146
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    when the Germans spoke about the 109 they said the one hundred and nine, rather than the one oh nine.

    right you are, in Germany we say one-hundred-nine , no one says one-o-nine

    That’s interesting, since as far as I know, no German calls the Porsche a nine hundred and eleven. It’s a nine eleven, just as it is the U. S. (See my book “The Gold-Plated Porsche: How I spent a Small Fortune on a Used Car.”)

    in reply to: There you are, buying a second hand book #850467
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    removed

    in reply to: Buchon versus Bf-109 (in terms of handling qualities) #859096
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Thank you, Mike, I’ll do that.

    And John, that’s wonderful of you to remember James so specifically. He was my best friend at Flying at that time.

    in reply to: Buchon versus Bf-109 (in terms of handling qualities) #859157
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I’m sitting here with my digital copy open on my iPad right now.

    I assume that’s a subscription. You can’t buy a single copy digitally.

    in reply to: Buchon versus Bf-109 (in terms of handling qualities) #859188
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I would do exactly that if FlyPast offered an on-line-viewing purchase choice, but all that seems available is the opportunity to buy a hard copy and have it snail-mailed. I don’t care about the cost, but I do care about the time involved. It won’t work with my deadline.

    in reply to: Nickname for RAF? #860690
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Okay, my problem now is that I know the nickname for the RAF–crabs–but apparently I was wrong in thinking fish heads referred to the FAA. Is there anything equivalent to crabs for the FAA? WAFU has been mentioned, but that takes too much explaining for an American readership, which is what I’m writing for.

    in reply to: Do we need STOVL when STOL might do? #868059
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Yes, I’ve put it there as well. Hadn’t realized there was a modern military section.

    in reply to: Asking $2.5 for a Spit. A record ? #873744
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    – anyone can drive a vintage car and walk away from the experience alive without any further training
    – you can keep it/them at home, and relatively little space is required
    – hardly any red tape involved with operating a car

    Cars are just so much more accessible and practical.

    ]

    These are not the reasons why people bay $35 to $50 million for vintage cars. Not even close.

    in reply to: Asking $2.5 for a Spit. A record ? #875664
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Compared to classic cars, you could make a case that vintage aeroplanes are undervalued, as prices for cars go to tens of millions.

    Actually, they aren’t undervalued compared to cars. Classic and vintage cars are valuable because they have verifiable provenance. If you put together a 1750 Alfa, say, from bitsas and fabricated parts, you’d have what the cars guys call a replica.

    in reply to: Blenheim airborne at Duxford #893811
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    A Cruel and Uncalled for comment.

    My “comment”? Hardly a comment, I asked a question. What am I missing? Perhaps the fact that we all should be reverential? I’m writing about this first flight for Aviation History magazine and prefer to get it right rather than simply worshipful.

    in reply to: Blenheim airborne at Duxford #894165
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Am I correct in thinking that the first of the “Duxford Blenheims”–G-MKIV–was a writeoff after its 1987 crash and was replaced by a second Bolingbroke airframe? And that this second airframe, G-BPIV, after its 2003 crash, is the one that has now re-flown? Most references to the airplane seem to imply that the same airplane has been restored three times, and I don’t think that’s true.

    in reply to: Last Flight of ETPS Beagle Basset #906971
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I ferried a couple of 206s from Shoreham to the U. S. It was a totally uncompetitive light twin–heavy, overbuilt, expensive, uneconomical. And one of its major failings was that the tadpole fuselage was unstretchable. Lucky it lasted as long as it did.

    in reply to: Memphis Belle model B17 up for auction #878374
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    A load of overpriced tat!.

    There’s no such thing as “overpriced.” Everything is worth what somebody will pay for it. A Ferrari 458 is overpriced to a Ford Focus owner, a Rolex is overpriced to a Swatch wearer, a Leica is overpriced to somebody who takes photos with an iPhone, hell, Trader Joe’s is overpriced to anybody who shops at Shoprite.

    Stepwilk
    Participant

    That airplane hit the ground intact, at a 15-degree nosedown attitude and under power. I suspect that thunderstorm had less to do with the crash than is superficially assumed. If I had been the Rhodesian NTSB, I’d have surmised that Malloch died of a heart attack, perhaps exacerbated by having suddenly flown into hail. If you watch the video taken from the Vampire moments before the storm penetration, there doesn’t seem to be anything like a towering Cu in the area–just lots of apparently typical afternoon weather for the area. Not saying they didn’t hit hail, but I’ve flown into worse, by the look of it. Probably dumb of me, but I survived. I don’t think Malloch had any idea that he was doing anything unusual or inexplicable.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #887761
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Why would it dogfight ????

    I never said it would. I simply said that one notable flying quality it happened to have was that it could out-turn a number of more agile (in other ways) fighters.

    So yes, you’re absolutely right: one of the P-61’s “strengths” was irrelevant to its mission.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 515 total)