dark light

Stepwilk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 515 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: P-61 opinions #887784
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I don’t know. Could a Stirling out turn a Hurricane? Beats me.

    P-61s and a variety of other fighters–pretty much everything but the Brewster Buffalo– were extensively tested against each other at the Joint Fighter Conference at Pax River, in October 1944. Multiple experienced pilots, maneuvers specifically choreographed. “Tactics and skill” were removed from the equation as much as possible. The P-61 did very poorly, except for turn radius.

    It’s fine to be remembered for “the final two kills of World War II,” but that’s more a matter of coincidence, location and timing than any remarkable quality of the P-61. I haven’t read your link–I don’t bother with model-maker and flight-simmer sites as legitimate sources of accurate aviation history–but as I remember, only one of the two victories has been officially accepted.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #887806
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    The story that has come down through the years, whether it’s true or not, is that the RAF crew flying the Mosquito -wanted- to lose to the P-61. They did not want the USAAF deciding that the Mosquito NF XXX was just the airplane they needed. since the Brits wanted to keep every one they could. I suspect it’s true, since all of the performance information I’ve seen on the P-61B puts it well behind the Mosquito in nearly every parameter. The P-61 was famously “too slow and low,” and the whole reason the P-61/Mosquito flyoff came about was that a number of U. S. high officers felt the P-61 was a dud.

    The one thing I do think might be quite true is that the P-61 out-turned the Mosquito. Despite the fact that the P-61 was not particularly maneuverable by classic standards, it had an incredible turn rate, particularly at relatively low speeds.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #887992
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Yes, it has a great deal of excellent info on the P-61, most of it fairly negative. Which is helpful, because I went into this thinking that it was one of the more overrated airplanes of the war, the subject of a myth built largely on its hulking appearance.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #888468
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    if you can get hold of the excellent, ‘America’s Hundred Thousand’ by Francis H.Dean, you’ll find a lot of good, factual info and technical data in there regarding its performance, handling, systems, and what its pilot’s thought of it as a combat aeroplane.

    Paul, many thanks for that recommendation. The book has arrived, and it is a stunningly comprehensive resource. Not cheap–$50 from Amazon–but worth many times that amount.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #891526
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Thank you, Paul–just ordered it.

    in reply to: P-61 opinions #891537
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    But wouldn’t “lessons learnt from previous attempts” have meant that they’d have created an airplane with the rate of climb, ceiling and speed to pursue and catch targets? Like, say, a Mosquito NFXXX? I’ll agree that it had the newest tech, troublesome as it often was, but it doesn’t seem to me that they did much else right.

    in reply to: Westland Wildfire #920811
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    The only mention of a “Westland Wildfire” I can find on the Web is one of those modelbuilders-fantasy things where imaginative modelers post what-if illustrations (“What if they had put Griffons on the Whirlwind?)

    in reply to: Wildcat cartridge start #929235
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I always thought shotgun starters fed the explosion gases straight into the cylinders and cranked the engine thusly. Now I’ve learned that the expanding gases actually work on some sort of worm-gear arrangement that does the cranking. Live and learn.

    in reply to: Triplane incident at Old Warden – pilot OK #874692
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Side slipping into the undershoot fence is simply poor airmanship!

    I do hope you are a pilot (I am) and that you have ample experience side-slipping WWI aircraft (I don’t).

    in reply to: Mosquito locking tailwheels? #890677
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    The very early ones didn’t what? Didn’t have locking tailwheels? Didn’t have Marstrand tires???

    in reply to: De Havilland or de Havilland? #891292
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Hmmm…interesting that somebody who uses the grocer’s apostrophe lectures us on correctness. But then I may be missing something, since Snoop seems to be saying that if we us all caps, we’re all correct.

    in reply to: Mosquito vis-a-vis Beaufighter #896042
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    While it could be foolish to try a one on one turning fight against a single seat fighter…

    With the exception of the Me-262. This, in fact is the way several Mosquitos avoided Me-262 attacks, by continually turning into them until they were able to flee or find a cloud bank. No -262 could turn with a Mosquito.

    in reply to: Bill Sweetman vs. Wikipedia? Mosquito research query #901534
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    Thank you, guys–just bought the Sharp & Bowyer book–$20 US, used, paperback.

    I find the availability of classic used books through Amazon one of the real treasures of the site. I have NEVER been disappointed and have received books categorized as “very good” by the seller that look brand new. And they always arrive quickly, well packed and almost always with a “thank you ” note from the seller.

    in reply to: Bill Sweetman vs. Wikipedia? Mosquito research query #902579
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    The Thirsks book I have. What is the “Sharp and Bowyer book”? Those two last names don’t turn up anything on Amazon…

    in reply to: A curious German weapon #905972
    Stepwilk
    Participant

    I believe the “General Doolittle in a P-51” thing has been proven to be a myth. Doolittle was peripherally involved in the project, but not as the pilot of a chase plane. I’ve also seen the account as having Doolittle flying a Mosquito, and his nearly being killed by flying into the explosion, etc. etc.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 515 total)