Ridiculous. Enough is enough from them. O’Leary & his mob seem to make everything an ordeal for passengers rather than making flying with them easy. It’s seems to me a case of a struggling airline trying to fleece as much money as possible from passengers with these ridiculous extra charges.
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve had many reasonable trips with Ryanair in the past, but I’m now extremely unlikely to fly with them & I hope this massively backfires on them.
Nice shot, but it seems a bit of a weird choice of south-east airport for them to fly into.
Nice little report. Not normally a fan of BA, been quite average every time I’ve flown with them, but I will probably miss the 737s once they’re all gone, there’s just something about them which makes them special.
Very nice. I gather that it was indeed a very nice day down south on Friday from those back home. 🙂
Sorry to hear that, Robbie. Happens to most people, fortunately it didn’t happen to me, but I’m sure you’ve plenty of other offers on UCAS that you like.
Have you heard from all 5 now? Now the tricky bit of deciding where to go/what course comes!
Sorry to hear that, Robbie. Happens to most people, fortunately it didn’t happen to me, but I’m sure you’ve plenty of other offers on UCAS that you like.
Have you heard from all 5 now? Now the tricky bit of deciding where to go/what course comes!
Great shots, Tom. Never visited there either – the idea of waiting around all day for not a lot of activity has never really been that appealing, unless it was lovely sunny day. 🙂
An update from the investigation suggests an altimeter problem:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7923782.stm
Sounds a bit of a minor event. If posted on PPRUNE no doubt quite a few of them will tear into these sort of news items as they always do with technical diversions! 🙂
I would be very surprised if the wake turbulence from a 757 could down a 737-800. Surely this sort of thing happens every day. Also, are both the 738 & 757 classed in the same category for turbulence / spacing ?
Seems extremely cheeky to impose such a tax. Mind you, I couldn’t see it happening and I’m sure many passengers would be unhappy, needless to say especially on the longer routes.
Great comments on MEN, guys – good on you for sticking up for Neil.
Neil – best of luck for the future, this is such a shame. 🙁
I highly doubt that is the case. Even if it was a system fault (giving an inaccurate fuel reading – i.e no fuel emergency) there are no reports that the aircraft had to hold for vast amounts of time.
Look at the BA 772, there was no fire there but it had sufficient fuel.
I’m not here to make judgments on what could or couldn’t of happened, I just look forward to reading the investigation with interest.
Good point. I could even refer to my earlier example of the BY 757 @ Girona for another case of a hard crash but no blaze.
There’s quite a boring bit of ATC feed on the internet somewhere of mainly ground frequency post-accident (http://archive-server.liveatc.net/EHAM-Airport-Post-Crash.mp3). I wonder if anyone was recording the tower freq at this time, although that may not yield anything as by all accounts whatever happened was sudden.
How quickly good news can turn into bad news. Very tragic, RIP to those lost.
Does seem a bit odd that it didn’t make the runway in supposedly decent weather conditions. You do have to ask whether they ran out of fuel, which is a realistic possibility given the lack of fire & sudden nature of crash.
From the photos I’ve seen it certainly looks like all onboard were very lucky. I too think an engine has come away. The way the aircraft broke up and the pictures remind me very much of the Britannia Airways 757 crash at Girona in 1999.
http://www.nos.nl/nosjournaal/artikelen/2009/2/25/250209_vliegtuig_schiphol.html