What operational capability is lacking to qualify it as ´useless´?
What an inept question – how can it operate effectively if it doesn’t look slick? Moreover, large center MFDs are critical so that pilots can watch good shows when bored! Watching dull analog instrumentation doesn’t alleviate this serious situation.
USS.
I’d have to agree with Quad on this one. By the time the MRCA start to come in, the Tejas II should be ready. A quick buy of 50 odd Pakfa direct from Russia might also be worth considering circa 2015-2020.
It is the shortfall of airframes till 2015, which is more of a concern, and this can only be addressed by puirchasing a/c that can be quickly inducted. More MiG-29SMTs and Qatari + UAE M2Ks might easily provide 2-3 sqds worth in 2-3 years. In a worst case scenario (delays in both Tejas II and Pakfa), perhaps a few extra MiG-29Ks could be bought by the IN – and certain duties be relagated to the IN.
The MRCA is rather late in the coming imho, and I can’t see the point of inducting this ultra expensive acquisition when a/c with similar (LCA mk2) and better (Pakfa) capabilities can be introduced in the same time period.
The “Medium” requirement can be handled by stop gap purchases of M2ks and SMTs. And the Tejas II should also address this requirement to some extent.
To conclude, save the $$s – invest in extra M2ks, SMTs, Tejas, Pakfa and the AMCA.
USS.
Take off with 3 EFTs and 8 AAMs on one engine? That too from Leh? Sounds ridiculously incredible.
USS.
What! Where is my center MFD? Useless upgrade! Btw, what is that pod in the second picture?
USS
How to give Sukhoi Chiefs a heart attack:
Hmm, does this decisively end the debate on intake curvature? Seems like there is curvature in the horizontal and vertical plane.
USS.
Well, the danger is very real imho – this whole thing could be scrapped. First, it was just Shukla, but now a bit from livefist as well. These guys are surely attuned to the noises coming out of the MOD/persons in the know.
One thing is for sure, that $ 10 billion budget does not look too comfortable for souped up Rafales/EFs – so let us see what financial wizardry is to be done.
USS.
IIRC, india also received some MiG-29Cs around 1994.
USS>
Don`t think the c/l HDU would carry 2000 lt and a drum unit….
Yes, I’d agree – just the cobham? pod.
Totoro – yes, that is 1150 liters for the underwings and 2150liters for the centerl.
USS.
How much fuel would the mig configuration above with four DT contain?
Edit: More important, is those DT, the same as Su-35S and Su-34 use?
My guess is that those are 1500 liter tanks, which means that bird could theoretically carry 1500X4 = 6000ltr PLUS 2000ltr centerline + 5000kg internal= approximately 13500 liters in fuel altogether.
IIRC, the Su-35 uses 2 X 2000 liter tanks underwing and the 29 uses 4 X 1500 liters plus can have 1 X 2000 liter tank centerline.
USS.
^ yes, it is unlikely to happen but not for the reason you point out. The M2k is a western bird anyway. The reason it is unlikely to happen is because the MRCA deal is almost done, kind of late to back out of it.
Not impossible though – the finmin might prevail and scuttle the deal if L1 tender is way beyond budget, which seems rather likely.
But seriously, I don’t see why an extra sqd of M2k + MKI + SMT + Tejas Mk1 doesnt’ make up for the MRCA in terms of pure numbers, and that too at a quicker pace (all inducted by 2015).
Bloody political circus!
USS.
Boom is right but thats not definitley the best way to go IMO. India is doing well financially now but if it ever gets into a recession the complex types and logistics will bite hard.
Looking at how the Tejas is coming along (rather well offlate) the MRCA is a bit redundant. A short term fix would be to procure second hand Mirages and MIG 29s (even those half built soviet ones put into the UPG standard) and another batch of MKIs. Then standardise on the MKI-FGFA-LCA. So by 2030 IAF will have AMCA-LCA-FGFA and some MKIs. Very streamlined 🙂
Agreed! The Qatari M2ks are in good shape and probly still available, a pitch for HAF Mirages right now might yield good results too. And there are fulcrums available – Hungary, Serbia, and even VVS. For probly 1/3rd the cost, they’d get plenty of capability and that too in a very quick time – so that the falling sqd strength can be addressed.
Use the funds for the Pakfa (far better than any MRCA), FGFA, Tejas II.
USS
It’s not really surprising that the typhoon was able to maintain its advantages over the other aircraft in terms of Thrust to weight ratio. What is surprising is that the Mig was able to produce similar performance.
I assume the heavy confer was a set weight/load for all of the aircraft to serve as a control element of a test. Therefore it would give you a good indication of each aircrafts performance.
Well it is not really surprising that the MiG-35 was up there when it comes to TWR. Its empty weight and thrust specs are v.similar to the tiffy’s (approx 11500kg:18000kgf). Probly carries more fuel internally though.
Two of the most powerful birds in the MRCA race for sure. The Rafale however, is not that far off, and better than the F-16 blk60, Shornet and Gripen NG. Take for example a load out of full internal fuel + 4 BVRAAM + 2 WVRAAM + 1000kg bombs, and the TWR will approximately look like:
EF: 11200 + 1000 + 4800 kg + 1000 = 18000/17000 = 1.0+
MiG: 11500 + 1000 + 5000kg + 1000 = 18000/17300 = 1.0+
Rafale: 9500 + 600 + 4800kg + 1000 = 15000/15900 < 1.0
F16/60: 10000 + 1000 + 3400kg + 1000 = 14500/15400 < 1.0
F-18E/F: 14500 + 1000 + 6500kg + 1000 = 20000/22000 < 1.0
Gripen NG: 7000 + 1000 + 3400kg + 1000 = 10000/11400 < 1.0
Of course, the F-16 will probably have the poorest range/radius in this situation.
USS.
It is a nice photo. Like Witcha says, it appears to still show mounting points for the Mars-Passat radar arrays in its island superstructure, suggesting that the decision to drop it and substitute Fregat-variants came at a fairly late stage.
Actually, I think I might have a high quality version of that image somewhere on my HDD, I’ll see if I can dig it up.
EDIT: Yeah, that qualifies as high quality I think 😎
Whoa! That looks awesome in a truly scary, gigantic fashion – something out of a somber, dreadful fantasy! Would hate to see them in a war, I’ll go and cower in my bower now.
USS
Think this will interest Indian posters.
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/46070.html#cutid1MiG building. First MiG-29K of the new batch is under construction, along with UPG airframes.
EDIT: A few of the airframes on the floor (not sure if you can see them in the pics) are for Myanmar. There are also unfinished airframes of ancient Soviet origin, supposedly planned for completion for an unknown customer, a contract with whom has not yet been finalized. Interesting, who is getting “new” MiG-29s?
What is quite interesting about the IN MiG-29s is the fact that the russians frequently mention “significantly” reduced radar signature. You can see that in at least a couple of external mods imho – first, the cross-tooth design on the radome, second, the decidedly sharp edges on the LERX (unlike the original 29).
Btw, that unknown customer might very well be India, there have been press reports that have suggested upgraded airframe numbers to exceed the current fleet of 63 odd a/c. Afterall, India did acquire as many as 80 birds. And there were losses – about 10-15 to attrition, which would mean replenishment might be required.
USS.
Well, quite frankly the MiG chap does have a point. From other reports, it was clear that most folks (including the Indian Navy) were quite satisfied with the engines and considered it a pretty decent achievement. The fact that they had a proto AESA fitted out also says something about their willingness to impress.
The thing is though that the IAF never was interested in the MiG-35 from the v. beginning. IIRC a CAS v. early commented caustically that the bird was no better than an “empty box” alluding to what he considered a rather poor avionics/sensor package – rather unfair considering that the M2k-5, which the IAF really wanted, hardly offers anything more than a MiG-29M/OVT.
What the IAF wanted was a western bird, specifically the M2k, period. And frankly, this was only fair because of their desire to diversify and not be held ransom to Russian OEM whims – strategic/operational independence. The fulcrum never stood a chance although their attempt to satisfy IAF needs via further developments was nothing short of extraordinary considering the doldrums the OEM was in.
So, all in all, hardly surprising that it didn’t make it past the tech evals. Good bird, and possibly the best overall package when price is taken into consideration.
USS.