dark light

GliderSpit

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,002 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • GliderSpit
    Participant

    This made my year

    Cheers

    Cees

    I didn’t know that you were also interested in V-bombers (top shelf, 18th book from the left).

    in reply to: Canon 40D #452442
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Thanks guys,

    With your assistance I have: found an interesting website about this subject:http://www.cleaningdigitalcameras.com/

    I have dry cleaned my EOS20D with my Giotto today (as I do weekly) and performed the test as described: aperture 22, manual focus: infinite etc. I used the ISO 400 setting, as I believe this make dust even more visible. I was a little horrified to see so many measles. In the next few days I will buy the nescesary stuff for wet cleaning. Should it turn out all wrong, I will be back here with my complaints. If it turns out well, I will be back sooner or later with clean pictures.

    GliderSpit
    Participant

    FL 2007

    in reply to: Canon 40D #452460
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Martin,

    Thanks for the extensive answer. I think it will be a 40D for me just before the next airshow season.

    in reply to: Spotted #1253403
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Dakota Drag em Oot

    18:45 hrs this evening, Dakota Drag em Oot flew over my house in easterly direction. Probably another appearance because of the commemmorations of the Battle of Arnhem this weekend. This aircraft dropped 35 para’s on Ginkel heath this morning. The cloud base was very low. Many para’s jumped while the aircraft (there were a couple of Herc’s as usual as well) were flying in or between the clouds at around 500 ft. Difficult job for the pilots, very grey pictures for me.

    in reply to: Canon 40D #452472
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Thanks Martin. I’m considering buying a new body somewhere april next year. I now have a 20D which is to become my second body. Dust is the only real problem that I have with this one. I wonder whether the dust protection of the 40D is working well. What is your opinion on this?

    in reply to: Canon 40D #452479
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Hi

    I went to a shop last Friday with the intention of just buying a CF card but when I saw they had the 40D on sale with the stock arriving earlier that very day, I went against my own advice abnout waiting 6 months before any potential bugs are ironed out and purchased a 40D there and then.

    I used it at the Shoreham airshow last weekend under mostly bright or sunny conditions so I can only give my first impressions. I will need another couple of weeks before I can confirm my opening impressions to myself. I need to get use to the camera a bit more and use it under other lighting conditions. Nevertheless, I certainly hope the last few remaining air shows will be sunny as well.

    My impressions:

    Better recording of detail.

    Better colour reproduction and graduation across the image

    Very good at focusing on dark images e/g dark aircraft against dark blue sky (where sun is in front of crowd line)

    As far as autofocusing is in genearal. The higher sensitivity for autofocusing only works as cross type on the outer focus points at apetures of F5.6 or larger so do not expect a huge improvement if your lens apeture is not any bigger.

    I prefer to stick with my Cannon IS100-400 lens even though the focus points may not work as cross type on this lens. All that I can say at the moment is that autofocusing is not worse using the 100-400 lens. I will need a couple of more air shows to decide if I have more hits with the autofocus. I do have a Sigma F2.8 120-300 but rarely use it but I might try it out with this Camera.

    All the telephoto lens (not the wide angle ones) pics in my Shoreham air show thread have been taken with my 40D but as they are only small web size images you cannot judge the camera from looking at them.

    I checked my high res RAW images in DPP by moving the sharpening slider right up to 10 to see how they looked.

    The settings I used were standard and ranged betweenn ISO100 to ISO250 in shutter prority at 320th a sec to 1000th a sec except for a few landings where lower shutter speeds were used.

    I have not done any high res A4 size sample prints yet. That is what mtters most to me but I am quite confident.

    At the moment I am happy with the camera. No electronic bugs……..yet!

    Hope this helps.

    Martin,

    What body did you use before the 40D?

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1256781
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Did Brian also fly this Hurricane at Flying Legends this year? At saturday july 7th I made a close up picture of the cockpit with presumably the pilot in it.

    in reply to: Shoreham air show Sat and Sun 2007 #524198
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Great Pics. The Swift glider against this background is very unusual. Thanks for sharing.

    in reply to: Shoreham 07 #524200
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    What a wide variety of high quality pictures!! The Yak picture is my winner.

    in reply to: Hurricane crash at Shoreham Airshow #1261515
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    My condolences to everybody.

    in reply to: Can you teach me how to fly… #1266639
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Well done! The “old movie style” is very appropriate.

    in reply to: Canon 100 – 400mm #452785
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Also faced with dilemna – do I keep my trusty EOS300D or do I get a 30D to complete the equation?!
    .

    If you use the camera mainly for airshow photography, it might be better to wait till the beginning of next year. There will be better cameras available for less money.

    in reply to: Minimoa flys again #1271489
    GliderSpit
    Participant

    Congratulations. The Minimoa is one of the most beautiful gliders ever build.

    in reply to: Dutch Spitfire landing mishap #1272192
    GliderSpit
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 1,002 total)