dark light

Marka1967

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Blackburn Buccaneer XV168 restoration thread #811758
    Marka1967
    Participant

    When we moved XW986 from West Freugh in the late nineties we had to remove the tail plane, outer wings and nose cone to fit onto the truck. We had ground power and a hydraulic rig connected and once the airframe was lifted off the deck we selected wheels up and retracted the gear. The airframe was then lowered into a couple of cradles on the trailer and then twisted round to about 35 degrees so we could get the correct width needed for road transport. Happy days indeed

    in reply to: BCWM's Jaguar GR.1 Roll-Out #777387
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Its only when something like this happens in preservation that all the hard work, blood sweat and tears all seems worth it. Power to your elbows lads keep up the good work looking forward to seeing the a/c move under its own power sometime in the future.

    in reply to: Not good news at all for Wellesbourne residents #774671
    Marka1967
    Participant

    The airfield is owned by the family and each member owns their own bit. Not all the family share the same views regarding selling up and indeed support the airfields activities and 655. You could move the aircraft but it wouldn’t run again.

    in reply to: Lancaster. Elevator Mod 1131 and Frame 36 #835950
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Hi Stukno I read it from Lancaster at war 2 there’s a chapter all about the early problems with the Lancaster told by their then chief engineer Sandy Jack. A Lanc was lost during a test dive the issue being the fuel jettison doors being ripped off in the dive and damaging the elevators which then ballooned and lost their covering. They fitted Anson wooden ribs to strengthen the elevators until a more robust elevator was produced.

    in reply to: Lancaster. Elevator Mod 1131 and Frame 36 #836115
    Marka1967
    Participant

    I think I read somewhere that there was a mod to Lanc elevators which involved adding more ribs to the internal structure to stop them ballooning under certain conditions.

    in reply to: Douglas DC6 G-APSA To Be Scrapped In February 2018 #836658
    Marka1967
    Participant

    I’m amazed the airport is still open, there is hardly any flying going on except for a few Cessna’s flying now and again but thats about it. The scrub land to the north of the airfield that is used for the northern approach is now being cleared for development and JLR just about own every bit of land in the area so I think it’s only a matter of time.

    in reply to: BCWM's Jaguar GR.1 Roll-Out #785179
    Marka1967
    Participant

    A dry motor is simply spinning the engine over on its starter without fuel. A wet cycle is when you spin the engine and add fuel but no ignition thus it doesn’t start. I would imagine the guys will do a number of dry and wet cycles before attempting starting the engines so they can check oil and fuel pressures etc.

    in reply to: "The Man In The Sky" film 1957 #810237
    Marka1967
    Participant

    On the TV now, Talking pictures channel 81 on free view.

    in reply to: Lancaster PA474 At Duxford For Major Work #810234
    Marka1967
    Participant

    I think she is fitted with a Lincoln tail wheel if my memory serves me well.

    in reply to: Serious Spitfire crash in France. #815540
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Almost as if the brakes went on or he hit some very soft ground and wheels started to dig in. Never seen an aircraft flip like that with full up elevator applied.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #791871
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Who’s nicked 648’s scanner then!

    in reply to: VTTS Hard Facts Finally Coming Home To Roost? #809868
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Fly XH558 into RAF Coningsby with a ‘one off’ CAA Permit and gift her to the Memorial Flight – who can then fly her under MAA rules, having of course also ‘encouraged’ the relevant Engineering authorities to resume support – or if that can’t be done with XH558 maybe XM655 is a better candidate as I believe that she has a different engine fit with greater availability of spares – but there again, any such ideas might be considered ‘pie in the sky’ or as mad as trying to get a grounded Vulcan flying again?

    XM655 has Olympus 301’s fitted and there are no flyable 301’s on the planet. Can we stop posting about flying a Vulcan it’s just not going to happen 558 was the only one capable of flight and that is now over so lets move on.

    in reply to: VTTS Hard Facts Finally Coming Home To Roost? #819543
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Back in the day it was said that would be returned to cold war standard at the end of display flying. However that would of course ground it for good.

    558 was converted to a tanker in 82 and had all of its ECM gear removed to accommodate the house drum unit and also had many systems deleted during the restoration back to flight so she is a bit of a dog when it comes to originality in my view and no longer represents a cold war era Vulcan. Her only claim is that she was the first B2 delivered to the RAF but thats about it really. If it can be moved it should be done sooner rather than later or I fear it may well end up in the bin when the trust folds due to lack of funds.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #825315
    Marka1967
    Participant

    I think they are hoping to do a taxi run at the end of January 2017 so keep a look out for the official announcements.

    in reply to: Vulcan move #825317
    Marka1967
    Participant

    [QUOTE=SADSACK;2363290]I though XL318 was the only Vulcan to be moved? Any idea how they moved this one?

    http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/vulcan/survivor.php?id=48[/QUOT
    I don’t think it was broken down for transport more than likely just towed there as the Vulcan is quite small compared to most of the American bombers of the day.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)