dark light

Marka1967

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vulcan XM607 #849943
    Marka1967
    Participant

    When I was a member of 655MaPS we had access to 607 in the late nineties, we were told to take what we wanted from the inside but not to touch the outside.
    If I remember we had both 1 tanks, EHPP, and many other bits from inside the bomb bay which was a pain due to a saddle tank being fitted. We couldn’t get access to the cockpit due to the door release lever being stuck even though we had the key to unlock it. This Vulcan should of gone to Hendon in my view.

    in reply to: Victor XH648 #908895
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Lets hope the IWM do something soon before she is deemed structurally un-safe. Look what happened to the Vulcan B1 at Cosford. It is after all the only Mk1 Victor on the planet.

    in reply to: Newquay & Cornwall #919805
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Ex RAF Davidstow is a must I went there last year, a great little museum and if you can go on the airfield tour it is superb.

    Mark.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #848294
    Marka1967
    Participant

    [QUOTE=richw_82;2244597]She will, though only in the same place as we put WR963 for work, which is the west end of Hangar 7.

    A Shackleton is a tight squeeze due to the 120ft wingspan the Vulcan would have an extra 9 ft of clearance. As for height of the fin being a problem, the DC6 is taller at 28ft 5in against the Vulcan’s 27ft 1in, and its why there’s a special roller shutter door above the normal door height. We never have to worry about it as WR963 is a relatively short 17ft 6in against her long legged younger sister.
    I think its due to that when a Vulcan is up on jacks and the way the main gear pivots forward and down when it retracts that the height of the hanger was going to be the problem. A Vulcan on sticks is quite away off the deck about 3 feet if I remember.

    My experience with HLF

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #848553
    Marka1967
    Participant

    If its a HLF requirement to have the aircraft indoors when it retires then the options are limited if there are no requirements then it could go anywhere where the runway is long enough for it to land within its safety limits. As for the case of it becoming just another Vulcan then yes it will but if it’s kept in ground running condition it will become 1 of 3 or 1 of 2 live airframes if Wellesbourne is built on and XM655 gets the chop.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #848558
    Marka1967
    Participant

    It would be no good having 558 at Coventry she won’t fit into any of the hangers there, the Shack is a tight squeeze but a Vulcans fin won’t go in.

    in reply to: AVRo Vulcan and LGB's? #871233
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Looks to me in the top picture that the Vulcan has had its TFR removed or is it the photo.

    in reply to: Herald G-AVPN scrapped Elvington #871385
    Marka1967
    Participant

    I’ve been in aircraft preservation for 20 years and have worked on Vulcan, Hunter, Buccaneer, and Nimrod and the one thing that stood out to me over the years is that people talk about preservation but don’t actually get involved and do any. To preserve any airframe takes money that’s for sure but its man hours that are required, if anybody see’s an airframe at the local museum that’s looking a little tired why don’t you join the volunteers and get stuck in. Many museums are short staffed as we all know and yes there are the H&S regulations to take into account but with a bit of training almost anybody could lend a hand looking after an airframe. You don’t have to be skilled to unblock a water drain or remove panels to let area’s breath and dry out on any airframe in my book.

    in reply to: 73 years ago tonight #899822
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Cologne was chosen due to it being a fairly easy target to navigate to. The decision to de-house the German population and thus affect armament production was not taken lightly but as one Bomber Command commander stated if you couldn’t get them in the factories then you could get them in their beds.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Final Season..??? #907692
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Totally agree with above once 558 is grounded public interest will dwindle very quickly and if any Vulcan deserves saving its got to be 607.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 Final Season..??? #907872
    Marka1967
    Participant

    Once 558 stops flying that’s it, XM655 and XL426 cannot be made airworthy even if the money and zero houred engines were available with no OEM support you just can’t do it. 655 and 426 are in reasonable condition considering they are kept outside and after spending 10 years as 655’s crew chief and a founding member of 655 Maps the aim was to restore the aircraft to taxing standard only. All the pie in the sky talk about trying to fly these two Vulcan’s is just that it will never happen. My vote would be Bruntingthorpe as a finale resting place.

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)