Kev35 and G-ASEA many thanks for the information.
My friend and his mother really appreciate the information to help fill in the detals of his RAF service.
Garrett’s grandson is takling flying lessons and now wants to visit one of the western Canadian museums to view an Anson in person.
Did you get to Planes of Fame or just Yank’s?
If the question is for me, I did both.
I never minded the cows, since I was flying I welcomed the emergency landing areas the farms offered.
In fact I spent a week there while doing some antique helicopter flying (Bell 47) at Zemlock’s at Chino.
It gave me lots of free time to visit and see everything on the field.
I was treated to a personal tour of POF by a volunteer and introduced to Steve Hinton, who was a very nice (and modest) guy.
The folks at Yanks are always great too. (On an early visit many years ago, I was told to just wander around the restoration area and was treated to the sight of a “hippie” loooking guy working on a P-47N wing guided by copies of original blueprints. Really neat.).
I also went over to the B-25 rebuild shop and looked around…didn’t get thrown out…and looked through fences at their storage area which included the Twilight Zone B-25.
I doubt if it will come to it….but
aren’t historic aviation supporters “tapped out” supporting the Vulcan?
Perhaps some hard choices might have to be made in the future.
Really, I thought by now anyone who has read anything about Welch knew that. 😀
It probably helped get him his post-war job with North American Aviation as a test pilot.
What I find inspiring about him is his death in an F-100 due to inertia roll yaw coupling.
Back then, test pilots put it all on the line.
No computer simulators to test designs beforehand.
They were testing supersonic jets when the industry hadn’t progressed far…in terms of some of their knowledge and procedures…from the air racing and glory days of flight testing in the the 30s.
One more item about Welch, there is a UFO book out there that blames his death on his jet being shot down by a flying saucer.:rolleyes:
I have the new Crowood book. It’s very nice.
It depends how deep and technical you need to go on the Comet disasters, but it seems to have a good section on it.
Very nice photos…
It’s great that the USAF allowed the flight.
I’m not sure many other countries would allow a foreign TV presenter such an opportunity.
First calll I’d maker would be to Nelson Ezell…see what he thinks about its viability.
Wonder if there are any spare rear fuselages and wing sets out there?
Now identified by some DNA on the sole of a shoe found nearby?:diablo:
Don’t tell TIGHAR!!! They’re really into shoe soles.
Thanks to Kev35 and pagen01 for remembering history…:D
For what it’s worth…I don’t present myself as any kind of expert…
It never hurts to put aircraft into a historic perspective.
A set piece featuring different types of aircraft working in concert is a mini history less on for the average (non-historic aviation expert) guy.
The CAF in the USA has been doing it for years…with their Pearl Harbour attack and even a Vietnam era air assault.
Likeswise, if probably wouldn’t hurt to place period items around aircraft while they’re on the ground. We some of this with reenactors, but it could be done with commercial types as well. Put a plane in a period ground setting with people in period costumes and vintage cars. I like seeing old cars with old planes, it usually makes the airplanes seem ahead of their time.
The Goodwood revival is a huge success in part because of efforts like this.
To state the obvious, for airshows to continue, they need to expand their audience…and to most non-plane people, seeing a succession of Spitfires and Mustangs make flypasts and doing mild aerobatics gets old after awhile.
I’ve always wondered about the US insistence on precision bombing over Germany but being more than happy to area-bomb Tokyo (in particular)…
If you read about 20th Bomber Command, you’ll see that B-29 raids with HE bombs simply weren’t getting the desired results.
Perhaps because of the disbursement of Japanese industry….
Also, the range/payload limitations incurreed by having the bombers based so far from their targets. For the same weight, a B-29 could carry a lot more incenderies than regular bombs. And with the largely wood and paper composition of Japanese cities, they proved particularly effective.
IIRC, it was General LeMay who asked for the switch (and perhaps made it unilaterally) …at least he’s credited with it in history.
And reding his autobiography and a biography about him, he never denied it.
If it were a revenge/racial matter, I would expect the decision would have been made by “higher ups” in Washington.
I don’t believe it’s really 140,000…
BUT IF IT IS….
What does that come to per flight hour? 😀
Defeated the Germans, but failed to liberate Europe, we lost the war …
In the case of the USA, its only mission was to defeat Germany, specifically the Nazis.
No one, especially the Stalin-trusting (and increasingly addled) FDR, ever saw US involvement as extending to fighting the Communists.
In fact, in the 30s it was rather trendy for intellectuals to be anti-Fascist and pro-Russian…if not overtly pro-communist (witness the support for Republican Spain).
That sentiment was echoed in the 40s by the Hollywood propaganda film “Mission to Moscow”, the second greatest piece of third-country Hollywood propaganda (after the pro-British “Mrs. Miniver”).
The anti-communist furor didn’t begin until after Eastern Europe was Russian dominated and went into high gear only after China went communist.
Fair comment John, but let’s not forget that Patton was not alone in the military as being a rabid anti-communist, Patton was a good soldier (in a particular array of warfare types) but I wouldn’t trust his political or social nous.
Yes but please recall pre-war the Army was so small and politically inconsequential that the opinons of a few officers weren’t widely considered.
And in the US, perhaps even more so than the UK, the military was very subserviant to the politicians. In other word, no one cared what they said so Patton’s warnings/opinions would have been dismissed, if they were heard at all.
(In fact, there was a feeling from a good part of the populace that anyone making a career of the military was somehow a social outcast. In the case of enlisted troops either drunks or thinly veiled criminals and they felt officers were there because they were of the “horsey set” like the wealthy Patton (or in the case of the Navy or Air Corps like to play with expensive toys…ships and planes) or they couldn’t get a job anywhere else).
Excuse the slight thread hijack, but does anyone remember a scene from the film Reach For the Sky in which a German soldier hits his ‘foot’ with a rifle butt ? Last time I saw the film this scene wasn’t there. Just wondering if my mind is going or they edit it for TV for some reason.
Thanks
Being good EU partner…they don’t want to step on German toes. 😀
And speaking of pilots with artificial legs, don’t forget film pilot Frank Tallman who not only contined his film work, but requalified for all of his licenses: fixed wing, helicopters, balloons, airship, etc, etc….