Interesting bodywork on the Dodge it’s hovering over, especially as it extends over where the bonnet usually is
It’s LHD and looks very much like an American milk truck (milk float).
Flying into a post office near you!!
Yes, but good only for air mail.
Next up Bomber Command stamps, good only for delivery to Germany.:D
I’d also recommed Pearcy’s Douglas Propliners….where he discusses all the classic Douglas airliners. a very handy one-volume source and one of my favorites.
Also, it’s a bit old, but a nice inexpensive resource….
The DC-3, 50 Years of legendary Flight by Peter M. Bowers.
As you can tell from the name it’s old, but worth having.
Great question. If Cessna doesn’t know you may be out of luck.
Try Edward H. Phillips, he’s written a great deal about Cessna.
There is also a Kansas Aviation Musem (I don’t know what the real name is) that does a lot of work on local firms.
Also, here’s a Kansas aviation history website that has a lot of GA content that Phillips writes for:
http://www.wingsoverkansas.com
For what it’s worth, Wiki has a photo of N503CC, which someone there calls the oldest flying Citation.
One of these days, small jets will be considered historic.
Right now, few are in museums…proabably because they’re still worth something as fliers or parts.
The NASM has an early Falcon 20, one of the original FedEX planes and Pima has a nice original Lear 24 (flown in and donated by it orginal owners). And a few ex-USAF JetStars and Sabreliners have been preserved, that’s all I know of.
Remember, were discussing Cessna’s prototype FanJet 500. It differed significantly from production Citations so wouldn’t have been covered under the Citations type certificate.
If that’s the case, it was never sold on and re-registered.
To make an uneducated guess, it was either used as a sales or training airframe/mock-up/display, given to an aviation trade school (as is common with GA prototypes) or university for wind tunnel work, or scrapped.
Am I right in thinking all those aircraft are British bar the CF 100 ?
Remember like the Concorde, the Jaguar is half-French and the Whirlwind is a U.S. design.
Other than that, not a lot of national diversity in the room.
And for what it’s worth….
Another great reason why you may not want to inflate them to ops levels, is
as tires age, it could be dangerous to inflate them that high while on the aircraft.
I’ve heard of engineers being killed while inflating them without the benefit of a safety cage.
He just gave a list of the B-17s attending.
I’m sure the event will have other types.
Why an emphasis on the B-17 (after all there are 13 flying worldwide)?
This year marks the types 75th anniversary.
And this year marks the DC-3s 75th birthday as well.
I believe that type will be honored at AirVenture.
Notice the Convair 880 above?
Must be the ex-USN example.
Not many B-1s, the first retired (as a money saving move) were very early examples that lacked some commonality.
Those B-52s are pretty much gone…pity.
Probably in one of the private yards surrounding AMARC or whatever it’s called now.
No, not the B-52s. Under a strategic arms treaty withe the Soviets/Russia, all had to be chopped up and left on site to allow satellite photo verification.
Parts may be at the scrapyards, not whole aircraft.
As John H says, there is one C-97 flying on the airshow curcuit. It belongs to the Berlin Airlift Foundation. The last time I saw it, it was stored at Moses Lake, Washington (Grant County Airport, ex-Larson AFB).
But I don’t think any others are being used as fire tankers or cargo ships in Alaska.
I could be wrong, though. The FAA frowns on some of the older types being used that way…and they’re awfully expensive to operate.
a bit draconian to instantly ban the lot i think, …
Bureaucracy again my friend….
The FAA and CAA have more in common than their last two letters. 😀
It survives to beg again another day!
Well done!
That is sad news ,it will go where most of the money is , to the USA ,just like Grumpy,Tigercat, P47 ,and many others
Terry
Right now, the dollar is cheap against the Euro…so don’t assume it will come to the US.
Warbirds go to people who want them. Weeks ended up with his Mossi and Shorts after they went unsold in the UK.
Likewise, the Red Bull fleet went to Europe…presumably no American wanted them badly enough to pay the price.
Sadly, the Lockheed Orion went to Switzerland in an auction, it would be nice to have an example of a 1930s single-engine airliner at the NASM, but that’s the way it goes.
Also, don’t sound like the Vulcan threats: “It will go to America…”
Fact is, not that many Americans are in the market for a Hurricane (not much US history, and it might require some specialist maintenance) or Shack, or Vulcan….or come to think of it, a P-47 or P-51.
Okay, I’ll take the bait and ask the obvious question…
Why does one marker have a 1947 date?
They do indeed get a full wash down afterwards…
I don’t think a helicopter would necessarily have to land in the water to need a wash. Any helicopter would need it after a low hover over the sea because of the salt spray kicked up by the rotor wash. Hovering over the North Sea in a Woodbridge-based HH-53 was almost like being in a snowstorm with the reduced visability.
When I attended the USAF Ocean Survival school, after landing in the ocean (via parasail) you had to inflate a dinghy and await a helicopter.
They’d hover over you and winch you to the door….then lower you back down because they didn’t want to get that much salt water in the aircraft.
They’d fly off, leaving you quite alone to wait for a launch to pick you up.
Fun stuff…:D