dark light

J Boyle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 10,666 through 10,680 (of 10,735 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RC Scale models #1404969
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Sunderland

    I occasionally brouse RC magazines at the news agent, and in a current American magazine someone has built a large scale Sunderland. There is a photo of it on the water and it’s amazing, even the common weathering of the paint has been done. beautiful. Also, I stumbled across a UK web site that features giiant scale RC planes … seems some of the Brits love huge models…warbird bombers, airliners, the works. Great stuff.

    in reply to: This week I have mostly been reading… #1405033
    J Boyle
    Participant

    “Racing through Paradise” by Wm. F. Buckley, Jr. Another one of Bill Buckley’s sailing travelogue books, this one has him sailing the Pacific with a group of friends aboard his twin masted 80 something foot sailboat.

    FYI…Buckley is/was a private pilot. He wrote about being a part-owner and flying an Ercoupe while a student at Yale in the late 40s for FLYING Magazine in 1977. It was a very funny story, a side I don’t usually see with Mr. Buckley.

    in reply to: FB-22 & C-130J launch platform? #2645125
    J Boyle
    Participant

    you could have it soon, and i daresay, relatively cheaply- with B-2 development costs paid off i doubt new planes will cost more than $400-500million each.

    I wonder if Northrop-Grumman kept the tooling? They may have sent it to AMARC, that’s what they did with the B-1 fixtures and I believe the A-10 as well.
    As you know intial USAF planes (pre-Cold War ending) were to build 132 B-2s…they ended up making 21 fliers. I know N-G would love to make more.

    in reply to: FB-22 & C-130J launch platform? #2671019
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Number 2 could be accomplished using any number of platforms. Why do they need new build Js when they’ve got tons of older crap sitting around in the inventory available for conversion.

    Dinger, I don’t disagree with your assessments of options 1 & 3, but I don’t see the USAF spending a lot of money to modify 1970s-vintage C-130Hs. And it would cost a lot of money, the missile mod would hardly be a quick “roll-on, roll-off” conversion. Heck, the R&D and flight testing alone would be enough to fund most air forces for a year or two!
    Nearly all the C-141s are at the boneyard, too worn out (or too expensive) to fix, while the C-5s and C-17s are needed elsewhere and would be too big of a target.

    in reply to: General Discussion #404870
    J Boyle
    Participant

    :diablo:

    REVOCATION OF US INDEPENDENCE

    In the light of your failure to elect a human as President of the USA and
    thus to govern yourselves,….

    Don’t be insulting to other board members. :diablo:

    in reply to: Name this Bomber #1408489
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Thanks for that, SOC. Anyone know anything about the MB-2, like how long was it in service? Also, any information on a US tour in the mid-20s, perhaps after the Billy Mitchell sinking of the German ships demonstration?

    Thanks!

    This link will tell you a lot, and give several photos.

    http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/research/bombers/b1-3.htm

    Enjoy!

    in reply to: Aircraft in 80's TV series… #1409707
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Cannot remember the name but I seem to recall a series on tv where some scenes were filmed at Duxford, and there were a couple of meteors painted black with some large code letters on the sides, Airforce, or something like that.
    Anyone else remember or am I just ‘barking’

    I believe it was called “Aerodrome”, it had a neat a retro-futuristic look about it. It also featured the TSR. 2.

    in reply to: Aircraft in 80's TV series… #1410649
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Too quiet at work…ho hum….

    So we’ve got

    Riptide -S-54
    anyone think of any more?

    😀

    It was a S-58 (H-34). Actually it was a S-58T, a conversion where the radial was replaced with a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT-6 “Twin Pac” turbine package. In the series it was supposed to be a barely flyable surplus piston ship, they even had sound effects of backfires, etc.
    I saw the helicopter for sale recently, it earns its living doing external lift operations.

    in reply to: Memphis Belle Filming 1989 #1414131
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Off subject just a tad but have you seen that t.v series Band of brothers, all i can say is absolutely fantastic!! 😀 read somewhere theres talk of doing a second series but based on the island hopping campaign in the pacific. Anyone else heard this

    Band of Brothers author Stephan Ambrose was (or had planned to) write a book about the Pacific. However he was diagnosed with lung cancer and died shorthly thereafter.

    in reply to: Landing at DX #1415131
    J Boyle
    Participant

    Nothing looks like England from the air.
    Everytime I fly into Gatwick or Heathrow and look out the window of the 777 I’m always impressed by the beauty of the countryside.
    I’ve seen the UK from the air in various aircarft, and I’ve landed in the nose of a B-17 in the states.
    Now if I could only put the two together.

    in reply to: mystery aircraft #1415137
    J Boyle
    Participant

    The tail is not DC2 but DC3, and wasn’t the C-34 a DC3? Isn’t that what is still flying over SF bay with Otis Spunkmeyer?

    No, the 2 C-34s were DC-2s differing from C-32s by having a different inetrion arrangement. The pre-war USAAC would give different designations for even minor changes.

    The “DC-2 1/2” transpoarts were C-39s. They featured DC-3 center sections, tails and landing gear on standard DC-2 fuselages.
    The B-18s had a DC-3 style tail, but without the dorsal fin.

    in reply to: mystery aircraft #1416294
    J Boyle
    Participant

    That was the bomber that was developed from the Dakota isn’t it ?

    Thanks, John.

    Actually it was developed from the DC-2, in fact, it had similar engines. A total of 217 were produced. They were purchased at the same time as the 21 C-32, 33 and 34s…DC-2s.

    As for the serial, Swanborough and Bowers says that 36-275 was a “straight” B-18…the later B-18As had 1937-39 serial numbers. All B-18Cs were conversions.

    in reply to: General Discussion #408992
    J Boyle
    Participant

    You seem to be having fun…

    The best thing is to let the investigation continue.
    The US won’t whitewash the incident because it was on TV. In fact, there is a greater chance the guy will be accused of something, just so it won’t look to outsiders that it is being whitewashed.
    I spent 20 years in US military public relations and I’ve seen a few cases where the service was deliberately tough on people just to make sure it the public was reassured the service was policing itself.

    Since I’ve never been in a situtaion like that (a life and death combat situation where nerves are on end) …and I suspect none of the posters on the board has either…lets wait for the evidence to be heard.
    Maybe the guy shot out of malice?
    Maybe he shot because he feared for his life?

    In the meantime ask yourself this? If you knew a TV camera was in the room would you knowingly shoot a guy in cold blood?

    in reply to: General Discussion #408996
    J Boyle
    Participant

    No, he probably agrees freedom of expression allright. But preferably not in places where he can get into contact with it 😉

    I’m all in favor of freedom of INFORMED expression, not most of the rubbish seen here.

    I’ve seen too many people spouting off about too many things they know nothing about to give them much credibility.
    I’m just tried of hearing opinions from people like GA who seem to have a pathogical need to constantly run down a county.
    After all it was GA who turned a good faith news posting about a happening in another part of the world into an anti-US jibe.

    How would you like it if everytime somebody said something about the UK, someone else brought up the point of being ruled by in-bred monarchs and being the home of “Eastenders” or ” Jim will fix it?”
    No place is perfect. Even the US and UK, and I’ve lived in both.

    Garry B …I never claim on this site that things didn’t happen or dismiss then out of hand. Most of my postings are for reasoned discussion, not rabid hate mongering of any country. And I’ don’t call people the “amusing” names as you state. Other people might but I don’t. I’m trying to raise the level of discussion on the board, not drag them down to the “two mates over a pint at the pub” level.
    And I certainly don’t impune someone motives (as you did Sauron) simply because you didn’t like what he said. If you have proof that Sauron (or anyone else) is working against Terhan…then prove it, other wise, you’re simply libeling a guy and name calling.
    If anyone is against discussion here, it’s you.

    in reply to: E-bay – the modeller's best friend #1418957
    J Boyle
    Participant

    factory models

    I recently bought a factory model of an Armstrong Whitworth Argosy.
    A plaque on the stand says it was given by the airframe maker to the Paris office of the US FAA (not the Fleet Air Arm…the other FAA) which is how it came to America.
    Any Argosy fans out there? I was the only one to bid on it and bought if for not a lot of money, but I wouldn’t mind it going to a good UK home.

Viewing 15 posts - 10,666 through 10,680 (of 10,735 total)