dark light

turbo_NZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,549 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft Carriers (not the sea-going variety) #1433126
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Nice pic, notice part of the flap cut away on the B-52, must be for loading of the SRV and clearance for the fins.

    TNZ

    in reply to: Aircraft Carriers (not the sea-going variety) #1433139
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Thanks Andy,

    I think there were 2 airships weren’t there ? USS Macon and Akron ?

    TNZ

    in reply to: Aircraft Carriers (not the sea-going variety) #1433161
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    …and…

    ANyone else have any others to share ?

    Cheers
    TNZ

    in reply to: I've Just Created A New Discussion Forum #1433250
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    I’m there 😎

    TNZ

    in reply to: Kamikaze Tiger Moth Squadrons!!! #1433254
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Yeah it’s quite amazing for sure.
    Move over B-2 and F-117, for the budget Stealth bomber from NZ is taking over !! 😀

    TNZ

    in reply to: Kamikaze Tiger Moth Squadrons!!! #1433272
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Far out !!!, 😮

    First I’ve ever heard of that….Surely the Tiger’s would be sitting ducks to ground fire…as they’re not the fastest bird in the world…

    That’s Kiwi enginuity coming through, but still pretty radical !!

    Cheers
    TNZ

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Hey Phil,

    Apparently, the original is in the Smithsonian.

    Makes me want to abandon the Nieuport replica plan and build an H-1 instead. SO inspired by Jim Wright’s story,…but could never match the engineering prowess he achieved !!

    Cheers
    Chris

    TNZ

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    almost forgot, thanks for the H-1 pics, jetman-2. 🙂

    Very nice !!!!

    TNZ

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Thanks for the agreement jetman-2.
    It’s so sad that Jim Wright is no longer with us. 🙁

    Story is that he avoided a bunch of people where he was going to crash land the H-1 and instead gave his life to save others.
    What a guy and what an aircraft !!

    No, sorry Phil don’t know.
    http://www.wrightools.com has a huge amount of info on the replica.

    Cheers,
    Chris

    TNZ

    in reply to: Airworthy Stuka?(2005 Zombie) #1435192
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    As a point of interest, was the Stuka an easy aircraft to fly (compared to a FW.190/bf-109) ?

    Cheers
    TNZ

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Here’s another shot of my favourite (racing) aircraft…

    Now what is there not to like about this beauty…… 🙂

    Cheers
    TNZ

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Pardon my ignorance, but in the movie, the Hughes H-1’s wingspan looked rather short and stumpy in comparison to that shot. Mind you, viewing from the front, I imagine that big front end could make the wing look shorter…

    Well funny you should ask that, Daz….
    I’ve been doing some research into the H-1,(rapidly becoming a real fav of mine now)
    Hughes built two wings for it.
    One was 25ft and the other 32ft.
    The original speed attempt was done on the short wing and after that Hughes modified it for a longer wing in the quest for added performance (and 30 gals more fuel capacity !!) Also it was to provide the space to install a hydraulically actuated landing gear system, the first time ever used in aviation.
    Quoted from the H-1 forum – “In refering to the H-1, and the actions that they took after the forced landing, Howard said, “Then we rebuilt it and put a larger wing on it, and with that same airplane I made the 7.55 hour flight to New York with the larger wing that contained more fuel, and did not really hurt the speed appreciably, because with a larger wing, it operated at a lower angle of attact and at a high altitude it was really just as fast as the first version with the small wing.”

    The replica has the longer wing for more practicality.

    Hope this helps

    Cheers
    Chris
    (TNZ)

    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Well having just seen “The Aviator” last night and ignoring it’s little aviation “mistakes”, I really enjoyed it….and that H-1 is a stunning aircraft…..

    Cheers
    TNZ

    in reply to: Stunning fire-fighting Neptune #1346356
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Not sure, but http://www.1000aircraftphotos.com brings up another twin-tail Mars.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v655/DazDaMan/MartinMars.jpg

    This is from :http://www.vectorsite.net/avmars.html

    The first JRM-1, named the “Hawaii Mars”, was completed in June 1945. The Hawaii Mars had the same wing and float structure as the Old Lady, but was otherwise extensively redesigned. The powerplants were upgraded to 1,790 kW (2,400 HP) Wright R-3350-8 Duplex Cyclone engines; the twin-tail was replaced by a tall single vertical tail; the fuselage was extended by 1.82 meters (6 feet); large cargo doors with electric hoists were installed under the wings with smaller cargo doors placed farther aft; and the internal layout was optimized for cargo and transport operations, with fewer internal bulkheads.

    Cheers
    TNZ

    in reply to: Happy birthday funhouse! #1346367
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Happy Birthday Funhouse from sunny New Zealand

    Cheers
    TNZ

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 1,549 total)