dark light

turbo_NZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,549 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Australian War Memorial #1421136
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Well that’s even better !!!!!
    Original is better than authentic in this instance !!

    🙂

    TNZ

    in reply to: CAF Dauntless 'deadsticks' #1421145
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Good to see the Dauntless got down safely and the crew are okay.
    🙂

    TNZ

    in reply to: Australian War Memorial #1422631
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Nice close-up pics.
    I like the fact that the Me-109 and 262 are not pristine. Looks very authentic.

    Cheers
    Chris

    TNZ 🙂

    in reply to: Brewster Buffalo picture. #1424244
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Interesting points there, Dave.
    They must have been doing something right !!

    Check this out from http://www.chuckhawks.com/brewster_buffalo.htm:-

    At the beginning of hostilities, Finland had a mere 307 aircraft. The Soviets had a large assortment of both modern and outdated fighters including the I-152, I-153, MIG-1, MIG-3, Yak-1, and Yak-7; plus Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-40s, and P-39s supplied by the Western Allies. Despite overwhelming numerical and, in many cases, qualitative superiority the “Pylly Walteri” (the Finns nickname for the B-239) performed exceedingly well against the Soviets Air Force. By the end of the Continuation War (as the Finns dubbed it) they had downed 496 aircraft, losing only 19 B-239s.
    Finnish air force records credit 41 kills to a single B-239 before it was shot down.
    Ironically, the best kill-to-loss of any fighter in the Second World War (26-to-1) was garnered by an aircraft that is widely considered the worst fighter of the war.

    That’s a horrendous kill ratio !!!!! 😮

    TNZ

    in reply to: Brewster Buffalo picture. #1424317
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Why did the Finns do so well, when the Kiwi’s, Ozzies & Brits not so ?

    Were the Finns exceptional pilots or were the Russians not so ?
    (or perhaps a bit of both)

    TNZ

    in reply to: AWESOME Fury photo's #1424321
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    I don’t think so…this looks like a classic stall to me. Notice in the last shot, showing the Sea Fury coming over the stern of the ship, you can see the starboard wing is stalled, and it appears the port wing aileron is up, indicating that the pilot has full left stick in to try and pick up the stalled right wing. While we cannot see the tail it is almost certain that he had significant up elevator, given the angle of attack. This is what is known as being “behind the power curve”. At this point the pilot probably applied full power, which with his slow airspeed and full flaps was insufficient to fly him out of this corner.

    The Sea Fury has excellent directional control, with a very effective rudder. A go-around is not difficult to execute, as the large vertical stab and rudder are very effective even at slow speed, and the plane does not have a tendency to drop a wing or torque roll with the addition of full power, provided the pilot is not behind the aircraft.

    SRP

    Thanks Steve for the very comprehensive answer.

    Cheers
    Chris
    TNZ

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1424494
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Thanks dhfan, I shall go and get it !!!

    TNZ

    in reply to: AWESOME Fury photo's #1424506
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Question,..

    Perhaps “Jacks” incident was caused by torque-roll ?
    Just an uneducated guess.

    How vicious is the Centaurus on the Sea Fury ?

    TNZ

    in reply to: Brewster Buffalo picture. #1424510
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Great pics of a not-so-liked aircraft, thanks Phil.
    As much as it was cr*ppy , it makes a change from Spits & P-51’s.

    TNZ

    in reply to: Worst Airshow #1424518
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    The setting is really great with a wide airfield and Masterton is really beautiful.
    They normally have the WW1 & WW2 reinactors there also (similar to Classic Fighters).

    Oops, getting off the worst airshow thread….

    TNZ

    in reply to: Packard vs. Rolls-Royce #1424523
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Stanley Hooker seems to be quite a man. I have to read his autobiography. Has been thoroughly recommended by various people.

    TNZ

    in reply to: Worst Airshow #1424650
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Ah well, I can concur on what those leaders are like !!!

    You’ll just have to make the 400km trip to Masterton (which is only 2 months away!!).
    Now that is getting better and better !!

    Cheers
    TNZ

    in reply to: Nieuport request #1427075
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Anyway, cheers for the links and pics, Dave & Phil.

    TNZ

    in reply to: Nieuport request #1427077
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    The 11 and the 17 are very different. The 17 is considerably bigger.

    MH

    Yes I agree, but the basic sesquiplane design was similar.

    TNZ

    in reply to: Nieuport request #1427701
    turbo_NZ
    Participant

    Thanks for that, Dave.
    If I remember rightly, there’s not a huge difference between the 11 Bebe and the 17.
    The 7/8’s scale one will look great done up in the “Grid’s” colour scheme of silver (apparently) and a fitting tribute.

    Cheers
    Chris
    (TNZ)

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,549 total)