dark light

Mick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 244 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cockpit Help #2477068
    Mick
    Participant

    F-22 Raptor cockpit.

    http://www.afa.org/magazine/Sept2002/0902raptor6.jpg

    And this will be the F-35 cockpit, featuring a massive panoramic display system with touch screen technology.

    http://www.afa.org/magazine/Sept2006/altitude04.jpg

    Eurofighter Typhoon cockpit

    http://www.eurofighter.com/images/et_as_co_gf.jpg

    in reply to: sas Chinook over sizewell nuclear plant #2477514
    Mick
    Participant

    Perhaps I should write in to the local newspaper with my views. I witness weekly a low-flying Chinook heading in a northernly direction. Occasionally it is a Royal Navy Apache attack helicopter. While I have two army bases within a 20-mile radius of where I live, I have come the belief that it is Spanish forces undertaking special black operations. You know the kind of thing. Bit like Hiliary Clinton with her coming under sniper fire at Tuzla airport while on a visit in Bosnia in 1996 when the war had ended.

    in reply to: USAF/USN UCAV/UAV Roadmap #2477738
    Mick
    Participant

    And there’s also this:

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/03/03/221893/usaf-defining-requirements-for-multi-mission-uas.html

    and this:

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/02/28/221892/us-navy-says-ucas-could-be-next-carrier-based-fa-xx.html

    There’s more, but it’d take time to post them up. Put it this way, the USAF and USN have a significant UCAV development strategy.

    in reply to: Affordable lightweight fighters #2480274
    Mick
    Participant

    I think it’s proposed, but when or if it’ll happen is anyone’s guess.

    http://www.yak.ru/ENG/PROD/new_130m.php

    This also from the Yakolev website:

    http://www.yak.ru/ENG/FIRM/art_switch.php?art=4

    I think also Aermacchi have said that the M346 wouldn’t need too many major modificiations to be turned into a light combat jet if required by any future operator.

    in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2481130
    Mick
    Participant

    Revisting this thread… Well it wasn’t Sweden:

    http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/8182/a/101188

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2481873
    Mick
    Participant

    Is that article on the Aviation Week website and do you mean the A400M? If so, can we have a link because it sounds complete pap.

    in reply to: Testing The F-35 #2481874
    Mick
    Participant

    Take the GAO report with a pinch of salt. Lockheed Martin and several others have already said that it is inaccurate and a US DoD report of the F-35 is due out in April that is supposed to be more on the ball with costs, etc. That’s what they say anyway.

    in reply to: Rafale news II : we go on #2484951
    Mick
    Participant

    Rafale International, it sounds very similar to another marketing company for a certain competitor plane. But atleast they have exported a few….

    in reply to: RAF uniform ban!! #2488015
    Mick
    Participant

    Yeah I saw that BBC Look East piece. There is also a shortened version of the BBC Look East website (URL not at hand).

    It’s also starting to be reported at this very moment that Wittering’s Station Commander, Gp Capt Ro Atherton, has issued a press release stating that the “advice” or “ban” (whatever you want to call it) remains in place, regardless of what Mr Brown or the Mayor of Peterborough has said. So it looks like the uniform controvesy will rumble on.

    in reply to: RAF uniform ban!! #2488162
    Mick
    Participant

    Also, I’m sure that any personnel serving at Wittering and advised by the Station Commander not to wear their uniforms out of base, would probably not wear them, irrelevant of whether it was an order or advice. This advice came from the station commander, not the base’s adjuntant, C/O or another officer from one of Wittering’s resident squadrons.

    in reply to: RAF uniform ban!! #2488215
    Mick
    Participant

    Arthur, Steve’s article actually comes from an Australian newspaper, although there is widespread coverage and debate about it here in the UK.

    http://www.news.com.au/mercury/story/0,22884,23337078-5005940,00.html?from=public_rss

    It does get worse I’m afraid, with The Times referring to a student union of a British university (University College, London) banning the Officer Training Corps from its campus.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3508223.ece

    On a positive note, the Times today also has an article on Flt Lt Michelle Goodman, the first female pilot to be awarded the DFC, has the headline “First woman DFC wears her uniform with pride”, although it’s a little spin on a news story that has little to do with Flt Lt Goodman’s personal exploits as a Merlin helicopter pilot. Good for her however.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3508222.ece

    in reply to: RAF uniform ban!! #2488270
    Mick
    Participant

    A sad state of affairs, but hardly surprising given that for years now British military personnel have been percieved as a separate entity to the rest of the general public. As a civilian, unless you have an interest in military matters, have friends or relations in the military, watch a few World War II films or Red Arrows air displays, are an ex-serviceman yourself, or, dare I say it, maybe have had a brawl with a few squaddies on a Saturday night out on the town about twenty years ago, contact with the military is pretty limited. The restrictions that The Troubles in Northern Ireland put on personnel wearing their uniforms in public didn’t help either. And prior to now, the government has done little to raise military’s profile within British society. Regardless of who the culprits were, there’s a long way to go before the British armed forces get the same support that the US military get from their own public. And a few Ross Kemp documentaries from Afghanistan or town parades are hardly going to change that. People need more education on the armed forces, while the forces need more interaction with the general public. Very sad.

    in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2491345
    Mick
    Participant

    At least that report confirms where SAC is at the moment. With two ordered, maybe some of the states that have signed-up might not be looking to procure their own C-17s (although obviously the Netherlands is mentioned as a potential customer). Again, we are no clearer on the undisclosed [potential] state mentioned in the original Flight Global article.

    in reply to: RAF future tankers #2492344
    Mick
    Participant

    I think the VC-10 is due to go out of service in 2011 when the A330 MRTT would become operational with the Tristar following a year later. As far as funding goes, I think that I have said before that if AirTanker and the MoD are forced to stump up the funding completely (as looks more likely according to most recent press reports, although financial institutions might be a more interested now given the major US contract for the KC-30), it will defeat the purpose of PFI and might as well be an outright purchase. I’ll leave the Hercules AAR question open to someone else, as I have no idea.

    in reply to: RAF future tankers #2492377
    Mick
    Participant

    As noted it’s all about money, that’s why the MoD put out for a PFI contract. Even that is uncertain with the AirTanker consortium reportedly having problems getting the finance together to fund the aircraft and may have to fund it themselves (along with the MoD). I would assume that the A330 MRTT also has a bigger troop and cargo carrying capacity than either the VC-10 or Tristar, so that might also be a factor as to why 14 are planned. And there is also the purchases of extra C-17s to reduce the workload of the VC-10 and Tristar fleet.

    Interestingly, a Defence Select Committee investigation into the UK’s air transport capability last year heavily criticised the RAF’s ageing VC-10 and Tristar fleet and the lack of availiability of aircraft for frontline duties. Marshalls at Cambridge (which works on the Tristar and Hercules fleet) suggested the possibility of getting hold of a few civilian Tristars that are still fly worthy and leasing them back to the RAF as an interim until the A330 MRTT is available. The offer has never been taken up and doesn’t look likely to in the future.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 244 total)