dark light

Mick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 244 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2499945
    Mick
    Participant

    This flight global article clarifies what is happening in regards to the NATO C-17s. Also, it mentions “at least three other countries” are looking at possibly purchasing the type, including an undisclosed Middle Eastern state.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/05/30/224316/nato-to-finalise-c-17-order-in-june.html

    Looking around the world now in terms of military deployments, etc I’d personally still go for France. I don’t know about the Middle East. Other countries: Pakistan particularly – over 10,000 troops deployed on UN missions around the world at the moment (the largest contributor to UN peacekeeping operations) and only a dozen C-130s available to get them there.

    in reply to: Helicopter Crash -Torrington Area – Devon #2500200
    Mick
    Participant

    It is not a Lynx, it was a Squirrel. No details as to which variant (HT1/2) or unit given that it has crashed in Devon. Both crew were killed.

    in reply to: Israel formally requests F-35As #2500220
    Mick
    Participant

    You have to admit, that is one impressive aircraft. Looks more exciting the Harrier.

    in reply to: C-17s 7 and 8 for UK? another mystery buyer? #2500716
    Mick
    Participant

    Qatar, that would be a surprise.

    Source: Flight Daily News – ILA 2008: Globemaster activity may keep line open

    Now that would be very strange – strategic airlift to ensure that Qatarian (or whatever you call them) troops can be deployed and resupplied easily while on military operations worldwide. Seems a rather odd choice. Nevertheless, I really can’t see Boeing shutting the production line down before NATO gets its two C-17s.

    in reply to: CVF #2077562
    Mick
    Participant

    Yeah, it does seem odd to be tucked away but then it is only the MoD saying we’re ready to sign a contract now, rather than we have signed a contract now. Hence probably why BAE Systems, VT, etc were all issuing press statements prior to the official announcement. I wouldn’t expect any further developments for at least a few weeks now and BAE Systems VT will have to form their new joint venture first.

    in reply to: CVF #2077583
    Mick
    Participant

    Not first metal. I think that’s due in the next few months or so. It’ll be the official manufacturing contract. So far, the only contracts awarded have been for lead-in materials (like the aircraft lifts) as well as the government signalling their intention to buy two carriers. No official contracts had ever been signed giving approval for the things to be built.

    in reply to: Modern Military Aviation News from around the world #2461303
    Mick
    Participant

    It is something that France wants, so they’ll find the bucks. Remember also any helicopter will be jointly procured by France and Germany under their Future Transport Helicopter requirement to enter service around 2017. Other contenders include the CH-47F Chinook and the CH-53K Super Stallion. As the article says, the French had a demo of the Mi-26T last year.

    http://www.defense.gouv.fr/dga/votre_espace/presse/communiques/2007/l_helicoptere_lourd_mi_26t_russe_en_evaluation_a_la_dga

    Quick translation:

    The Russian Mi-26T landed on 5 November 2007 at the DGA’s Flight Test Centre at Istres for technical evaluation for the future transport helicopter requirement. The evaluation was in prepration of the launch of the design stage for the future transport helicopter in 2008. A decision is due by 2012.

    Personally, if they can fit western avionics in it, it’ll be a really good alternative to the above, especially for exports.

    in reply to: Amazing pics of Pearl Harbour WWII #2078267
    Mick
    Participant

    Yeah you be right, from the national archives. Might be a legitimate posting, but if it was a joke…. why?

    http://www.war-veterans.org/Pearl.htm

    http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2004/winter/images/pearl-harbor.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing pics of Pearl Harbour WWII #2078323
    Mick
    Participant

    Some of those photos are pretty impressive. Have they been published or seen before? Do you have any more? Might be worth getting them published in a book…

    in reply to: Typhoon Wheels up landing in US #2463988
    Mick
    Participant

    The official response today via the MoD’s News “Blog” (never understand why they call it a “blog” — it’s not one really, other than something they give official responses to newspaper articles) is that the damage to the aircraft still has to be assessed and it looks to be still airworthy, but they won’t make any official statement until a Board of Inquiry has been convened. No injuries to the pilot or anyone else. Not really much to add, so forum rumours are probably all we are going to get for now.

    in reply to: Future Lynx in doubt #2464302
    Mick
    Participant

    I think he meant the AW149. True about what it is currently geared up for, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t be able to have an assembly line for AW149s or any other AgustaWestland associated product for that matter (including the NH-90 which has domestic assembly for the likes of Finland and Spain). I mean the British Army’s order for the WAH-64 Apache weren’t all built in the US because Yeovil was just responsible for assembling the EH101 and the Lynx. It would depend on the size of the order(s) and besides AgustaWestland/Finmeccanica views Yeovil as its division for military helicopters, so construction of all AW149s could take place there, especially if Future Lynx is cancelled.

    Interestingly, I just came across this article from Flug Revue featuring an interview Guiseppe Orsi of AgustaWestland.

    http://www.flugrevue.de/index.php?id=2276

    Looks fairly recent, but he confirms that the AW149 is still due to fly and an announcement about it will be made at the end of year (Q&A 8). It was Orsi that said in 2006 that Yeovil would have the lead role in the development of the AW149. A quick look on Westland’s website also reveals a few job vacancies at Yeovil at the mo for systems engineers to work on the AW149. So that pretty much confirms that helicopter is still on track.

    in reply to: Future Lynx in doubt #2464387
    Mick
    Participant

    HM government was supposed to be funding the AW149 too. Funding for the project was coming from AgustaWestland and I believe the Italian Treasury and there were several articles back in 2006 that quoted the Chief Executive of AgustaWestland, Giuseppe Orsi, stating that the company was in preliminary discussions with the UK Department of Industry (now the Department for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform) about financing (although it would be far less than FL). God knows where it went after that.

    in reply to: Typhoon Wheels up landing in US #2464569
    Mick
    Participant

    I thought the latest was that they had shelved plans to deploy the Typhoon in Afghanistan, at least for now. I refer the honorable gentleman to a question asked in the House of Lords last month and the reply given by Baroness Taylor of Bolton, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, MoD where she said that “My Lords, at present there are no plans to deploy Typhoon to theatre. So far as that aircraft is concerned, we are focused on developing its air-to-ground capabilities in order to optimise its potential. It is a world-class aircraft, and we think we can make further improvements. The Harrier is there at the moment and is performing well. Close air support is very important to our operations and we will continue to assess what capabilities can best achieve it.”

    in reply to: Future Lynx in doubt #2464741
    Mick
    Participant

    Assuming it is cancelled (given that something will get chopped and that’s probably the easiest to do even if there is a prototype built), it depends though on whether it would need to be delivered earlier. When the AW139 was announced in 2006 AgustaWestland said that it make its maiden flight in 2009, same with the first Future Lynx, with an earlier ISD and initial operational capability of 2011 (compared to 2014 for the FL). Most of the avionics systems would be similar to the Future Lynx BRH, while Rolls-Royce and Turbomeca had suggested that the RTM-322 could be used (there’s a document somewhere on the Internet on this). This option doesn’t answer what would happen in regards to the Royal Navy’s Lynx replacement, but this helicopter would very much more suit the Army’s needs now. It was even said at the time that the AW149 was announced that AgustaWestland at Yeovil would have the lead role in developing it (even after the Future Lynx had been ordered). But there has not really been any mention of what is going on since 2006.

    in reply to: Future Lynx in doubt #2464898
    Mick
    Participant

    Yeah, AW139 (or the AW149 if that ever gets going) would be perfect for the Army. I was joking about “EADS Eurocopter” as the article referred it to as there is no such type (other than a manufacturer owned by the other) and Eurocopter has no off-the-shelf helicopter for the task that it produces on its own other than the Cougar. Hence, why I thought that the journalist meant the NH-90 NFH.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 244 total)