dark light

critter592

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 881 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Models By Critter592 #218617
    critter592
    Participant

    I can’t believe I’ve not looked at this thread (or indeed posted to it) for so long…
    Some more. All are 1:72 scale.

    B-29 Superfortress 44-86292 Enola Gay (Academy)

    http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll233/2woDee/Model%20Aircraft/44-86292_zpsbnrzewxb.jpg

    Avro Lancaster Mk.1 W4103 (Airfix, old tool)

    http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll233/2woDee/Model%20Aircraft/W4103_zpsln3kwy25.jpg

    Visit the crash site

    The aircraft was destroyed in a mid-air collision with Oxford LB415 (below) on 14:04:1944.

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #849310
    critter592
    Participant

    Methinks there may be issues with clearances on those inboard props… :highly_amused:

    Seriously though, excellent work so far. Can’t wait until that forward fuselage progresses from the CAD drawing to the real thing.
    Well done guys. :eagerness:

    in reply to: Sea King for Tender #850532
    critter592
    Participant

    Airframe is not in flying condition…

    No kidding?! :applause::stupid:

    in reply to: A-W Meteor NF.14 WS788 Restoration Thread #858788
    critter592
    Participant

    Looks like a good base for a restoration. Best of luck with her!

    …I think I should make it into a forum ‘Bodge of the Year trophy’, to be presented annually to the restorer on Key who finds the most comedy previous repair while restoring an aircraft…

    Only aircraft? I’ve seen some corkers while restoring my buses…

    in reply to: General Discussion #228583
    critter592
    Participant

    Yes.
    That theory is one that is widely circulated by those who wear tinfoil-themed headgear, and no doubt use controlled substances…

    critter592
    Participant

    Yes.
    That theory is one that is widely circulated by those who wear tinfoil-themed headgear, and no doubt use controlled substances…

    in reply to: BBC1 Yorkshire "Inside Out" 7.30pm tonight, Monday 25/1/16 #858851
    critter592
    Participant

    Interesting.
    During the entire programme, no one mentioned (or they forgot to mention) that the removal of items from a crash site without a MoD license is an offence…

    in reply to: General Discussion #230327
    critter592
    Participant

    Great video.
    I recall having a somewhat heated discussion with a certain tinfoil hat-wearing tosser a few years ago (I’ve mentioned him previously on this Forum), who was trying out this particular argument on me; I tried explaining to him, but he wasn’t having any of it (I’ve just sent him this video link).

    “But… What about the ‘planes? They’re made of steel?”
    I corrected him.
    “But… There were explosions. They brought down the towers.”

    I then mentioned to him the melting point of aluminium (660 degrees Celsius, or thereabouts), and invited him to conduct an experiment for himself, by melting a small amount of aluminium (I resisted the urge to suggest melting down his tinfoil hat), throw some water onto the molten metal, then report back to me with the results!
    (DO NOT try this experiment at home, kids.)

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, I heard nothing back. He refuses to speak to me now. Ah well.

    in reply to: 9/11 Conspiracy: Video near 4,6mil views 1 day #1798448
    critter592
    Participant

    Great video.
    I recall having a somewhat heated discussion with a certain tinfoil hat-wearing tosser a few years ago (I’ve mentioned him previously on this Forum), who was trying out this particular argument on me; I tried explaining to him, but he wasn’t having any of it (I’ve just sent him this video link).

    “But… What about the ‘planes? They’re made of steel?”
    I corrected him.
    “But… There were explosions. They brought down the towers.”

    I then mentioned to him the melting point of aluminium (660 degrees Celsius, or thereabouts), and invited him to conduct an experiment for himself, by melting a small amount of aluminium (I resisted the urge to suggest melting down his tinfoil hat), throw some water onto the molten metal, then report back to me with the results!
    (DO NOT try this experiment at home, kids.)

    Perhaps unsurprisingly, I heard nothing back. He refuses to speak to me now. Ah well.

    in reply to: B29 Nose, art gallery display #890713
    critter592
    Participant

    Yep – Pretentious bolleaux. :stupid:
    What a waste of a perfectly good B-29 cockpit.

    in reply to: General Discussion #231307
    critter592
    Participant

    Halfords.*

    As some of you know, I am a keen cyclist.
    Over the past few months, I have noticed that the chainset on my Diamondback Topanga mountain bike is getting rather worn. She is currently on her third chainset, fitted by myself in 2009. Cost back then was around £55 for the lot (chainwheel, chain, rear cassette).
    The bike in question is the 1995 model, and the frame was built to order for me. It is oversize, as the maximum size available off the peg was 22″. My frame is 24.5″.

    A few days ago, on my way home from work while riding said bike, I decided to call into Halfords and obtain some prices.
    After explaining that the parts that I required were for an older machine, and that I wanted to preserve as far as possible the bike’s original appearance, the rather pleasant young chap, Will, who served me admitted that he wasn’t sure about Shimano products, but as the mechanic (haha) was there, he would ask him. He disappeared into the back, returning a few minutes later. He told me that (according to this so-called “mechanic”) a complete chainset would be in the region of £200, plus fitting, and that I’d need a new bottom bracket (I don’t), which (apparently) are £70+. (They aren’t.)

    I mentioned that I’d been servicing, repairing and building bikes for more than 25 years, and what this “mechanic” was telling me was utter b*ll*cks. I also added that the price given was more than six times what I’d found for the same parts online. I asked to speak with the mechanic, offering to show him the bike.
    Strange thing was, this “mechanic” would not speak to me, but was happy to take a look at the bike. I watched with some trepidation as Will wheeled my bike into Halfords’ workshop.

    A few minutes later, my bike reappeared. Will informed me that the mechanic wished to offer me a free service for my bike as a goodwill gesture. Having heard some horror stories about Halfords standards, I politely declined.

    I have since ordered the parts I require to undertake a full Winter service on the bike. Total cost including new chainset, cables and brake pads: £60.

    (*Also known in Chez Critter as Hellfrauds and Halfwits.)

    in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1799003
    critter592
    Participant

    Halfords.*

    As some of you know, I am a keen cyclist.
    Over the past few months, I have noticed that the chainset on my Diamondback Topanga mountain bike is getting rather worn. She is currently on her third chainset, fitted by myself in 2009. Cost back then was around £55 for the lot (chainwheel, chain, rear cassette).
    The bike in question is the 1995 model, and the frame was built to order for me. It is oversize, as the maximum size available off the peg was 22″. My frame is 24.5″.

    A few days ago, on my way home from work while riding said bike, I decided to call into Halfords and obtain some prices.
    After explaining that the parts that I required were for an older machine, and that I wanted to preserve as far as possible the bike’s original appearance, the rather pleasant young chap, Will, who served me admitted that he wasn’t sure about Shimano products, but as the mechanic (haha) was there, he would ask him. He disappeared into the back, returning a few minutes later. He told me that (according to this so-called “mechanic”) a complete chainset would be in the region of £200, plus fitting, and that I’d need a new bottom bracket (I don’t), which (apparently) are £70+. (They aren’t.)

    I mentioned that I’d been servicing, repairing and building bikes for more than 25 years, and what this “mechanic” was telling me was utter b*ll*cks. I also added that the price given was more than six times what I’d found for the same parts online. I asked to speak with the mechanic, offering to show him the bike.
    Strange thing was, this “mechanic” would not speak to me, but was happy to take a look at the bike. I watched with some trepidation as Will wheeled my bike into Halfords’ workshop.

    A few minutes later, my bike reappeared. Will informed me that the mechanic wished to offer me a free service for my bike as a goodwill gesture. Having heard some horror stories about Halfords standards, I politely declined.

    I have since ordered the parts I require to undertake a full Winter service on the bike. Total cost including new chainset, cables and brake pads: £60.

    (*Also known in Chez Critter as Hellfrauds and Halfwits.)

    in reply to: General Discussion #240414
    critter592
    Participant

    So sorry for your loss, Paul.
    Speaking as someone who is owned by two cats, I know exactly what you are both going through.

    After we lost Timmy, my orange Tabby a couple of years ago to a RTA, I now repeatedly tell my partner & his daughters “No more cats!”
    However, I have no doubt that there will be others; for us, and maybe even for you too.

    Timmy is at rest at the top of the garden, quite close to his favourite sleeping spot under the rhubarb.
    To the left is my Mum’s cat, a silver & white Tabby (also called Timmy), and to the left of that grave is Dinky, my second cat.
    On the other side of the path lies Freddie, who was a rather bad-tempered black & white shorthair, and to the right of his grave is Charlie-cat, a grey & white shorthair with an incredibly long tail. Charlie-cat got his name from the ragged C-shaped marking on his back. We lost him to FLV.

    Thinking of you both.

    Don

    in reply to: Animal Lovers only please reply #1804796
    critter592
    Participant

    So sorry for your loss, Paul.
    Speaking as someone who is owned by two cats, I know exactly what you are both going through.

    After we lost Timmy, my orange Tabby a couple of years ago to a RTA, I now repeatedly tell my partner & his daughters “No more cats!”
    However, I have no doubt that there will be others; for us, and maybe even for you too.

    Timmy is at rest at the top of the garden, quite close to his favourite sleeping spot under the rhubarb.
    To the left is my Mum’s cat, a silver & white Tabby (also called Timmy), and to the left of that grave is Dinky, my second cat.
    On the other side of the path lies Freddie, who was a rather bad-tempered black & white shorthair, and to the right of his grave is Charlie-cat, a grey & white shorthair with an incredibly long tail. Charlie-cat got his name from the ragged C-shaped marking on his back. We lost him to FLV.

    Thinking of you both.

    Don

    in reply to: Vulcan Last Flight? #853640
    critter592
    Participant

    Some fantastic photos in this thread.

    Well Kudos to the team for re-arranging the route to fit in EMA after being diverted away yesterday – I hope those there enjoyed seeing her.

    I certainly did.
    The disappointment of the Saturday was more than made up for by Sunday’s appearance.
    The Jet Provost’s take-off just behind the Vulcan was a nice bonus. As was its return shortly after, when most people had left.

    Thanks VTTS.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 881 total)