dark light

critter592

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 881 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1834870
    critter592
    Participant

    Today’s blood-pressure raisers:

    – The work colleague who didn’t complete his tasks yesterday, leaving the next mug (me) to clear up the mess that he should have dealt with.
    – The tw@t in the white van who seemed to think that just because there was a cycle track next to the road I should have been on it… After he’d hooted at me, and indicated by pointing at said cycle track, I subsequently caught up with him at the next set of lights (I can still make a MTB shift!), and using a few choice words, explained to him the relevant points of the Highway Code, suggesting to him that he read it. He drove off in a huff without saying a word.

    in reply to: P38 On Welsh Beach – So-called, by a few "Maid Of Harlech" #877205
    critter592
    Participant

    I can’t let sCOTT bROOKES‘ post go without sharing this link:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4gXaq0fmzk

    :highly_amused:

    in reply to: New Tv series Air crashes of WW2 investigated #877357
    critter592
    Participant

    I’ve just got around to watching the second episode (Turweston Wellington Collision), and I was quite pleasantly surprised.
    The crash site of BK272 is close to the route I used to drive on my weekly deliveries a number of years ago.

    Seriously lacking I thought was a site investigation; a fieldwalk at both crash sites would have been better than the seemingly endless repetition of the key facts.

    It seemed to be pretty good, but like jettisoning I was

    …frustrated by the presenter and that woman doing the voice over… …and too much repetition. …if he is a serious investigator why not actually start with the CHORLEY losses…

    I too was rather annoyed by the initial lack of reference to Chorley’s work. AND the silly female narrator referred to him as W H Chorley…
    Perhaps the most annoying error (which caused me to yell loudly at the TV, sending both my cats running for cover) was when said silly narrator referred to the Wimpy’s construction as “geodesic.”

    That said, I am in 100% agreement with Soggy – We should be grateful for programmes like these, despite the compromises made to get it to appeal to Joe Public.

    critter592
    Participant

    Signed.
    Also shared on Facebook and Twitter.

    in reply to: New Tv series Air crashes of WW2 investigated #898015
    critter592
    Participant

    Have set the faithful PVR to record the series.
    Thanks for the “heads-up”, scotavia.

    in reply to: I need to talk about this… #1837918
    critter592
    Participant

    100 kmh? In a built-up area? Near a school bus?
    Words fail me. I hope the Police throw the whole damn library at her. A totally avoidable RTC.
    You expect something like this (or you should) when driving near schools, school buses, etc, and you drive accordingly, i.e. slowly and with care.
    Not go “bombing along” at 62 mph. 😡

    R.I.P. to the lad.

    in reply to: Lancaster FM212 Comes In From The Cold… #910446
    critter592
    Participant

    Another (potentially) airworthy Lanc?

    Great news. One can never have too many Lancasters. Thanks Peter!

    in reply to: Stirling Project Update #910455
    critter592
    Participant

    Coming along nicely, chaps! :applause:

    Shame about that wreck in YK’s link. I see some potential there. (Did I also glimpse the remains of an unopened parachute pack?)

    in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1838612
    critter592
    Participant

    I hate Brand. He’s made a career out of talking Class A bolleaux VERY LOUDLY.

    What annoyed me today was a family member posting Britain First garbage on Facebook; a photo of a poppy exhorting us to remember the Fallen.
    I don’t need to spell out the irony of this…:rolleyes::stupid:

    in reply to: Irritating adverts #1845208
    critter592
    Participant

    …There was only one ultimate washing powder that lived up to the promise, but they withdrew it because it destroyed your clothes in the process.

    Well, at least your clothes would always have that “new” look (because they would be!). :highly_amused:

    in reply to: What's your headstone going to be like? #1846654
    critter592
    Participant

    Depends how I depart this life…

    If I die in a fire (probably saving some other poor sod), it’d probably read:
    “Here lies Don Bryans, the toast of Long Eaton.”

    Or the current favourite:

    In VERY small lettering:
    “Get off my grave, you nosy ****.”

    in reply to: HEADS UP EVERYONE !!!!!!!!!! #1847976
    critter592
    Participant

    A belated “Happy Birthday” to you, Moggy! :very_drunk: Twenty-one again?! 😉
    Hope you had a good day.

    All the best,

    Don

    in reply to: Chemtrails – the explanation. #1848148
    critter592
    Participant

    Slight (?) thread drift, but a conspiracy theory nonetheless…

    The tinfoil-hatted tw@ttery has started already with regard to MH017; see this link.

    Clearly, the people who write this garbage haven’t a clue about air crashes, and have no respect for the innocent victims of this atrocity.

    in reply to: Chemtrails – the explanation. #1848158
    critter592
    Participant

    GO BUZZ! :applause:

    in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1848335
    critter592
    Participant

    Jim,
    The Boeing 777 is still the safest twinjet in service; only four hull losses since it entered service.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 881 total)