dark light

XEROX

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069435
    XEROX
    Participant

    So, neither Soko nor japan is capable of taking independent decision. They are probably not unkils favourite poodles but are very close.

    Your view that a nation that has a close relationship to the US is their poodle?, what about Israel, India buy advanced military technology from them, doesn’t make no difference.

    Why exactly would india want either as a main defence partner?

    Simple, South Korea can offer advance stealth designed ships, and India can strengthen its ‘look east policy’, geo-politics being the end game.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2069442
    XEROX
    Participant

    The F-18 is a crappy fighter and no one in right mind for even bother with a plane like that. Strike is its forte and IAF finds it too heavy and cumbersome.

    Hmm, only the most powerful and advanced military in the world uses the F-18 too.

    Korea a defence partner for India…. . Sure if wishes were horses beggars would ride. Next indo-nipponese alliance against china I suppose?

    South Korean heavy industries, be it ship building, is highly efficient and effectual, more advanced then India’s, much to fact, Japanese and South Korean are leaders in this field.

    in reply to: More information on BA's long haul replacement plan. #584399
    XEROX
    Participant

    Well BA has been longstanding with Boeing so it’s not difficult to see why Boeing has the advantage here, coupled with commonality of newer a/c and the issue of infrastructure already being in place.

    However I do see Airbus with a chance, firstly because of Willie Walsh, he was then CEO of Aer Lingus who seemed to have a good relationship with Airbus, they had an all airbus fleet (?), secondly BA fly 11 flights a day to New York from London, they could reduce those numbers if they fly that route with a A380 and use slots left over to expand its Heathrow operations.

    in reply to: China Eastern Airways #587904
    XEROX
    Participant

    I flew with China Eastern on an internal route a few months back, the crew were very attentitive and soke decent english, the food and leg room were not as good, as was the condition of the a/c.

    Shanghai Pudong is a very good airport to, very quick and clean.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2072341
    XEROX
    Participant

    The potential UK buy of ~150 JSF added with the development money they put in will amount to more than any order for 126 SH, and they still have to argue about being able to service and operate their aircraft on their own without periodically sending the planes to a LM centre located in the US.


    Breakthrough as UK signs technology transfer deal with USA to allow Lockheed Martin F-35 JSF purchase to go ahead

    That has been resolved now, we have “operational sovereignty”

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2072565
    XEROX
    Participant

    There is no point having a debate with someone living in denial. Open your eyes, India will never buy anything of stratergic value from US.

    After the litmus test i.e. the nuclear package, I envisage their to be an upsurge in defence deals, the navy could be procuring the P8 multi-mission maritime aircraft (MMA), and the army some C130Js. This is just starters; let’s see what happens, maybe Aegis systems could be on offer in the future, At the end of the day American defence products are second to none.

    Rafale is the most likely choice for MMRCA. IAF will never allow a mediocre plane like F-18 to enter service.

    How do you now what the IAFs requirements are when DoD haven’t issued RFPs. I rate the French Rafale as a very capable fighter. But as an all round platform the super hornet may have the edge.

    Were presuming their will be a prerequisite for AESA radars in the RFP, the F18 E/Fs APG-79 AESA radar beats Rafael’s RBE2 hand down, it has better agile beam and multi-target tracking capability

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2073541
    XEROX
    Participant

    If the South Korean industry strikes up a relationship with the Indian Defence Ministry they will receive a deal or be invited

    The Koreans have a very mature ship building industry, their combat ship building skills are self evadent just look at their designs – KDX-3, im sure that if the Indian navy tendered for aegis type destroyers they would welcome the Korean Destroyer eXperimental no doubt.

    The RFI is for a set of seven stealth frigates, each costing about Rs 4,000 crores.

    What immediatly comes to mind is the La Fayette, very stealthy design, dispalces around 4 700 tonnes, and can accomadoate a 10 tonne helicopter.

    Taiwain ordered their Kang Ding-class, six Lafayette-class frigates at a cost of US$2.8 billion.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/FS_Surcouf.jpg/300px-FS_Surcouf.jpg

    in reply to: A380 to tour India #591176
    XEROX
    Participant

    They have no right to do so before 2010

    Well this being said on the asumption that the Indian goverment would reduce the 5 year domestic rule to 3 years, so when Kingfisher finish their mandatory dometic only service, they have brand new toys to play with for their new long haul services.

    in reply to: A380 to tour India #591188
    XEROX
    Participant

    Why have Kingfisher ordered the A380…i thought they were predominantly a domestic airline

    Their international arm goes online in 2007/8.

    in reply to: The future of air travel? #591191
    XEROX
    Participant

    I actually believe airships could have a very specialized market

    Watch this space, i read an article in the Times, few months back stating how Richard Branson would(?) in the future think about launching airships over the rail network??

    personally i see air traval in the future to adapt a 2 factor approach, the first being green, fuel efficient engines and traval, the second being supersonic traval, lets watch this space.:)

    in reply to: Lufthansa to order 747-8 Passenger Variant #592018
    XEROX
    Participant

    Kudos to Boeing for launching their 747-800i with a blue chip airline, a question though if I may, did Lufthansa ever at any stage consider procuring the 777-300ER for their capacity needs, esp. for an a/c in-between the A340-600 and A380.

    p.s. now that Lufthansa have got some brand new toys to play with, please put some decent entertainment system in them:) .

    in reply to: Lufthansa to order 747-8 Passenger Variant #592423
    XEROX
    Participant

    According to people familiar with the situation, Lufthansa has agreed to place firm orders for 20 planes

    The article has no official Lufthansa comment on this, hearsay right now

    in reply to: Lufthansa to order 747-8 Passenger Variant #592432
    XEROX
    Participant

    longtime Airbus customer Deutsche Lufthansa AG

    Last time i looked Lufty had 92 Boeing a/c:)

    in reply to: Western countries using Russian aircraft #2514357
    XEROX
    Participant

    didnt Finland operate MIg 21S., Poland opeated, operated MIGs

    in reply to: Yet More A380 Delays (Merged) #525378
    XEROX
    Participant

    i honestly belive this aircraft is going to be the biggest mistake airbus have ever made i just cant see it working in the industry its about as versitile as a Sunderland AFC, the 747 will still be the king of the skys.

    Well EK bought 43 of these big birds for themselves, so obviously their is some sort of market for this sized a/c, we must have to understand that theirs nothing wrong with the flying side of this a/c, the programs gone belly up becouse of issues like wiring installation problems,

    I bet all these airliners who are reviewing their orders would probably be getting very sweet deals for future Airbus models i.e. A350XWB.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)