dark light

XEROX

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 86 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Singapore Airlines picks 787-9!! #525915
    XEROX
    Participant

    Your right about 777-300s being new and dandy, but even though the A350XWB-xx(2012) will have much more advanced features I think airlines will prefer it simply because it would be a generation ahead of the 777.

    About Y3, if it will happen, it probably wonโ€™t be ready until 2020; IV read somewhere that its a cross between a 777 and 747, interesting. I would much prefer Boeing to reinvent the sonic cruiser

    in reply to: Singapore Airlines picks 787-9!! #525935
    XEROX
    Participant

    Boeing had 24 or so 787 UFO’s, im guessing SQs was 20 single UFO order?

    Most informed sources expected a mix of 787 and 350’s for them!!

    Very very likley SQ will be a big 350XWB customer.

    in reply to: Singapore Airlines picks 787-9!! #526153
    XEROX
    Participant

    Im wondering if these will be replacments for B777s?, SQs 787s come in when they are phasing out the 777s.

    in reply to: New supersonic commercial aircraft? #563241
    XEROX
    Participant

    Before that, however, we will see business jets go supersonic. Small, 10 seat little things dashing through skies at some 1.5 mach. No afterburner of course

    I thinks its already in the stages of feasability/concept development, its a supersonic business jet (SSBJ), named “The Aerion”, powered by P&W JT8D-219 engines, i think it does have a $100Mill price tag.

    Link

    in reply to: New supersonic commercial aircraft? #563737
    XEROX
    Participant

    Better yet, which airplane goes 4 mach?

    No mil a/c does that, anything above mach 4 is hypersonic speed. MiG-25s do go at mach 3.2

    in reply to: New supersonic commercial aircraft? #563749
    XEROX
    Participant

    ‘Son of Concorde’ plans unveiled

    Japan and France are to work together to develop a successor to the retired supersonic jet aircraft Concorde.

    Companies from the countries will split an investment of $1.84m-a-year for research over the next three years, Japan’s trade ministry said.

    The agreement to develop the new passenger plane was signed at the Paris Air Show, Japan added.

    The new plane will have 300 seats and cut the flight time between New York and Tokyo to six hours, reports said.

    Japan’s trade ministry also said the two sides would work at solving the problems that plagued Concorde, such as noise and high-fuel consumption.

    Successful tests

    “This is truly significant industrial co-operation,” Japan’s trade minister Shoichi Nakagawa said in a statement.

    “Bringing their respective advantages together… should lead to the ability to offer highly advanced aircraft and services in the future.”

    The ministry added that Japan had successfully tested an engine that could theoretically reach speeds up to five times the speed of sound.

    Concorde flew at mach 2 – twice the speed of sound. It never recouped the huge amounts invested in it by the time it was taken out of service, after 34 years, in 2003.

    However, French airline Air France was one half of the Concorde team, and the country will bring its own technological knowledge of the supersonic jet to the table.

    The deal also represents a break with Japan’s habit of working with US groups in the industry.

    “To research closely in this area with the Europeans does represent something new,” said Yoshio Watanabe, an official with the Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies which is heading the new initiative in Japan.

    Link

    This article from the BBC is about a year old now, i havent read anywhere stating the projects been cancelled, going by this article, the French and Japanese are mid way through reserach.

    Personally i feel the idea could be quite feasable, much research has gone into scramjet technology.

    in reply to: LBA – NYC via Jet2.com #600023
    XEROX
    Participant

    What the odds on Jet2 getting a 767 for LBA-JFK ops ????
    Perhaps a 767-200.

    Yep, their is commanality between Boeing 767/757 a/c but how about the 737-700/800/900 flying transatlantic, in theory it can be done.

    i doubt it would, nothing good ever happens these days, LBA will never get a USA service

    the LBIA chiefs already said that he expects a New York, Islamabad service in 3 years

    Airlines like CO, DL rely on connecting passengers for these type of services alot, Jet2 would have no such connections.

    Codeshare with JetBlue, ๐Ÿ˜€

    I understand that JetBlue and RyanAir are thinking of Transatlantic flights, anyone heard this??

    in reply to: Wing profiles and technical data #557661
    XEROX
    Participant

    Have you looked at analysing a cranked delta wing style

    in reply to: Boeing sonic cruiser #562829
    XEROX
    Participant

    Yep its not viable becouse of the various reasons, though it would have been awsome to see and travel on but sadly not to be, i reckon speed to be the key in the future, maybe Boeing or Airbus are working on a scramjet propulsion system so we can traval New York to Tokyo in 2-hour, not bad :p

    Seriously though i think this could happen, it may need drastic redesign of the a/c and development of an operational scramjet propulsion system, something NASA is already testing this tech on its X-43A program and has so far achieved speeds of MACH7 ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Boeing sonic cruiser #564719
    XEROX
    Participant

    Their is already one, not done by Boeing but by Aerion, its called the Aerion Supersonic Business Jet and i think is coming out around 2010.

    http://www.manager-magazin.de/img/0,1020,480031,00.jpg

    Read somewhere that itโ€™s powered by P&W engines and goes at mach 1.6 and the price tag is in the region of $80 million

    http://www.aerioncorp.com/index.html

    in reply to: MD90 vs. 737/A32X #567175
    XEROX
    Participant

    The MD90 takes 22,104 L of fuel and flies 3,860 km, compare that with the Boeing 737 that takes 26,020 L of fuel and flies 6,225 km – ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: MD90 vs. 737/A32X #567655
    XEROX
    Participant

    First of all the MD90 (if were talking about the 30 series) is out of production, where as the 737 and A320 family isnโ€™t, the technical characteristics are quite similar – the MD90 has a range of 3,860 km and take-off thrust of around 25,000 lb, technologically comparing it with 737/A320 its obsolete, no fly-by-wire, ISMS or sub components such as CDS, LCDS, and in newer cases HUDs

    in reply to: Want to build your own Cruise Missile!! #1951668
    XEROX
    Participant

    Just to add on previously, more modern cruise missiles are being developed with a centralised I.T unit, i dont know how the Tomahawks work but the PJ-10 BrahMos uses VPN for communication between command system and missile.

    in reply to: General Discussion #368295
    XEROX
    Participant

    Just to add on previously, more modern cruise missiles are being developed with a centralised I.T unit, i dont know how the Tomahawks work but the PJ-10 BrahMos uses VPN for communication between command system and missile.

    in reply to: LBA Summer 2006 charters #570248
    XEROX
    Participant

    Did the rudder partially fall off an A310 Air Transat flight

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 86 total)