dark light

RadarArchive

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 898 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mystery ladder #1028867
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Don’t tell me I’ve stumped the forum! Does no-one have even an educated guess? Any suggestions or comments would be welcome (within reason :)).

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1020172
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I think we have a winner! Wow – thanks for that Wyvernfan. A Python had never occurred to me, but it is a clear match both in the combustion chamber and the flame tube. Thanks again!

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1029286
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I think we have a winner! Wow – thanks for that Wyvernfan. A Python had never occurred to me, but it is a clear match both in the combustion chamber and the flame tube. Thanks again!

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1021401
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.

    I know what you mean. I do think our one is Goblin and the photo below of a Goblin engine shows the inside and outside of flame tubes quite well. This does seem to be a pretty good match to our example.

    I hadn’t realised there were different flame tubes in Proteuses. If you are able to find a photo of a Proteus showing the same time of flame tube as in our example, I would be very grateful. It would just be nice to confirm that this is indeed Proteus and not something else.

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1030498
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Just as an aside, your Goblin flame tube looks remarkably like the one in your Proteus cutaway.

    I know what you mean. I do think our one is Goblin and the photo below of a Goblin engine shows the inside and outside of flame tubes quite well. This does seem to be a pretty good match to our example.

    I hadn’t realised there were different flame tubes in Proteuses. If you are able to find a photo of a Proteus showing the same time of flame tube as in our example, I would be very grateful. It would just be nice to confirm that this is indeed Proteus and not something else.

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1021855
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.

    Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1030980
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for the responses. I think number 4 is Derwent, as it matches the dimensions of another Derwent tube we have. I am unsure about the proteus, if only because the drawing below seems to show a very different type of flame tube. It may well be Proteus, but it would be great if anyone has a really good photo of a cutaway Proteus showing the flame tube just to make sure.

    Thanks again for all the information so far which has been tremendously helpful.

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1022583
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Pete,

    That’s great, thanks. No suprise that you recognised the Welland flame tube! May I ask can you check the following to make sure that I’ve identified them correctly? I believe they are as follows:

    Combustion chamber 1: Avro Canada Orenda
    Combustion chamber 2: Rolls-Royce Derwent II
    Combustion chamber 3: de Havilland Goblin II flame tube
    Combustion chamber 4: Rolls-Royce Derwent V

    Thanks again for identifying the other two.

    in reply to: Combustion chambers #1031778
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Pete,

    That’s great, thanks. No suprise that you recognised the Welland flame tube! May I ask can you check the following to make sure that I’ve identified them correctly? I believe they are as follows:

    Combustion chamber 1: Avro Canada Orenda
    Combustion chamber 2: Rolls-Royce Derwent II
    Combustion chamber 3: de Havilland Goblin II flame tube
    Combustion chamber 4: Rolls-Royce Derwent V

    Thanks again for identifying the other two.

    in reply to: Aircraft in Charlwood? #1024503
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    A little Googling reveals this to be the location of Aerospace Logistics Ltd, with a website here: http://www.aerospace-logistics.co.uk/Default.asp.

    in reply to: Aircraft in Charlwood? #1034057
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    A little Googling reveals this to be the location of Aerospace Logistics Ltd, with a website here: http://www.aerospace-logistics.co.uk/Default.asp.

    in reply to: Sea King ZA134 #1045829
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for this, which confused me. However, the penny has now dropped. The reference I have to flights by 134 in December 1992 are not, in fact, ZA134 as I thought but refer to the callsign rather than the serial. Thus, I’m looking at Rescue 134, a Wessex from B Flight, 22 Sqn at Leuchars.

    Thanks nonetheless for your help and sorry for any confusion I’ve caused.

    in reply to: Sea King ZA134 #1050785
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for that Lee. I’m afraid SAR helicopters are outwith my area of expertise! I thought it was possibly based there in 1992 – do you know where it was that year?

    in reply to: Mystery Fin #1062782
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks for all the replies guys – it’s great to get the identity of this tied down, but a shame I’ll never know which wreck it came from.

    in reply to: Mystery Fin #1063842
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks guys for all the information. It’s pretty conclusive and I guess it is indeeed from a Hudson. I assume it is from one that crashed in Scotland – I only wish I knew which one!

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 898 total)