dark light

RadarArchive

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 898 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • RadarArchive
    Participant

    Turned out they were part of the Chain Low radar system!

    Well … yes and no. Dunnet Head was originally built for the Admiralty and was the naval equivalent of CHL, known as CDU or Coast Defence U-boat, and was primarily intended to watch for U-boats attempting to break out the North Sea. The station remained in naval hands until 1943 when it was handed over to the RAF. This photo was taken in, I think, 1965 and shows one of the naval Sub-Lieutenants who commanded the station standing next to one of the original brick huts for the radar. For further details, watch our for my forthcoming book. 😉

    RadarArchive
    Participant

    There’s a lot more there than just airfields. The Sub Brit site includes various elements of the command and control organisation, civil defence, etc.

    RadarArchive
    Participant

    How about an r/c model Mossie ?
    🙂

    Plane Mad,

    Forgive me if someone has already mentioned this (I’ve not spotted it, but you never know) but your superb r/c model only appears to have two .303 barrels protruding from the nose. Should there not be four, or am I just missing something?

    in reply to: AVM Sir Keith Park in WWII aerial combat #1410954
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Lastly, I think I read somewhere Keith’s son was also a pilot and was killed in combat. Has anyone got details of this?

    I don’t have details about Park’s son, but are you aware that his nephew, Nigel Manfred Park, 412727, who was killed on 25 October 1942 whilst flying with No 126 Squadron in Malta? He was credited with 10 and a quarter kills and one damaged.

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1416299
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks Alan,
    As I’m interested in the same area… ‘SOE in the Low Countries’ (MRD Foot) seems to cover this v. well, but the Giskes ops were (IIRC) over by mid 44. The mess of the SOE ops in the Netherlands is one of the least creditable chapers of British warfare. No deliberate sabotage occourred, but the levels of incompetance were truly stunning. The Dutch weren’t blameless, but the campaign was British (SOE) led, and partly hindered by SIS (MI5). Beware your friends.

    Just a minor comment. The Secret Intelligence Service, or SIS, is the service popularly known as MI6. MI5 is the popular name for the Security Service, responsible for counter intelligence within the UK (and these days much more besides!)

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1416756
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    And what is even better is that you turned your spare room over for the book and I didn’t have to lift a finger!

    RESULT!!!!

    No turning over required. That particular bookcase is about two feet from the PC and none of my 1200-odd books are more than about 5 feet away. 🙂

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1416840
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Melvyn,

    You’re quite right. I had missed it, but there is another ‘chapter’ in the bok, by G/C Hgh Verity, entitled, ‘Pick-up By Hudson’ which gives a fair bit of information on the use of Hudsons by 161 Sqn. Unfortunately, although there is a photo of T9465 ‘Spirit of Lockheed-Vega Employees’ which was operated by 161 Sqn, the photo is of the aircraft during its time with 269 Sqn in Coasta Command. The other photos in the chapter are of Lysanders. :rolleyes: Interestingly, the Lysander photos are from the same file I mentioned earlier, AIR 27/1068. Have you looked at this? There may be other photos of use, perhaps of Hudsons?

    There is one interesting mention: “There was provision for small scale parachute operations with a chute through the floor.” So that answers that question!

    This is an interesting account, but it runs for six pages, less photos, so it’s too much for me to re-type. It would be well worth obtaining from your lcoal library by inter-library loan. The edition I have was published in 1984 by the Book Club Associates by arrangement with Ian Allan Ltd, but its listed as first published in 1983, presumably by Ian Allan. No ISBN is given.

    in reply to: Cardington photo #1417295
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Linzee,

    Thansk for that. I’m pretty certain I approached them last year with this and they were unable to help. I’m also pretty sure the photo was available online, but I can’t find it now.

    in reply to: DazDaMan #1417318
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I hope you have a very Spitty birthday.

    All the best.

    in reply to: 161 RAF Hudson ops #1417430
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I’m not sure if this is the book Melvyn is referring to or not, but in Royal Air Force at War edited by ACM Sir Christopher Foxley-Norris is an account by ACM Sir Lewis Hodges entitled, ‘Flying Secret Agents To and From Enemy Territory’. This includes a photo of Halifax II NF-W of No 138 Sqn (no serial given) which comes from AIR 27/1068 at The National Archives. A quick scan of the text indicates that it is almost entirely devoted to Lysander ops and I can see no mention of Hudsons.

    in reply to: Cardington photo #1417438
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    OK, maybe not completely full … :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Cardington photo #1417453
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Very nice photo, Box Brownie. If I may hijack this thread, can I ask if anyone has seen a photo of the airship sheds at Cardington full of bunks when the station was used as a Recruit Centre during WW2? I’ve seen such a photo somewhere a long time ago but can’t remember where. Any help would be much appreciated.

    in reply to: ASR airfield photos #1418795
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Tom,

    I completely forgot that there is a superb website dedicated to Banff which you may find interesting. It includes a large selection of photos.

    http://www.scotshistoryonline.co.uk/rafbanff.html

    in reply to: Tse-tse question #1421426
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Thanks very much indeed for that. I was right – it is interesting! 😉

    in reply to: Tse-tse question #1421965
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Do you have more details about this Ju88 incident, such as date, rough location, squadron, etc? It sounds very interesting.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 898 total)