dark light

RadarArchive

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 898 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chief of Chaff dies #1566112
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Watson-Watt, in his autobiography, Three Steps to Victory, credits the idea of Window to Professor Lindemann who gave the idea to Churchill to present to the Air Defence Research Committee in 1937. The idea was largely dismissed and no investigation of Window was carried out until 1942.

    I was surprised by this, which seems to be the first good idea that Lindemann came up with. He dismissed radar in the early days, preferring aerial minefields, and also stated that long-range rockets (ie the V2) were impossible because they could only use solid fuel and would therefore need so much fuel as to be too heavy to get off the ground! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Battle of Barking Creek #1566846
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    What I find quite ironic, is that a film crew with director Alexander Korda were at Hornchurch on 6 September 1939 filming scenes for the film The Lion Has Wings! Some of the pilots involved in the incident must have appeared as ‘extras’ in the film.

    in reply to: Chief of Chaff dies #1566940
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I’ve never actually seen dates for when Germany began development of Düppel, so I don’t know who developed it first. I do know that both Germany and Britain had come up with the idea independently but neither side was prepared to use it for fear of giving the idea to the other side. By 1943, however, Germany did not have the strength to launch a concerted bombing campaign against Britain, so the value of Düppel was not great. However, it was of immense use to Britain in its attempts to reduce losses in Bomber Command. Hence Britain used it first, but the Germans used it on later air attacks on Britain.

    in reply to: Chief of Chaff dies #1567123
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    The first use of Window by the RAF was on the night of 24/25 July 1943 during the attack on Hamburg.

    The German Air Force used Düppel for raids on Britain in January 1944, and possibly earlier (but certainly not before July 1943).

    I don’t know off-hand when the USAAF first used chaff, but I daresay someone else may be able to answer this.

    in reply to: Chief of Chaff dies #1567266
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    The US did have radar before the outbreak of war – in fact the term radar is a US creation. It was called RDF by British forces up until 1943.

    The USAAF was using chaff during their bombing offensive. Yes, it was daylight but anything which would reduce early warning times, or enable smaller diversion operations to seem like large formations and therefore attract more fighters away from the real bomber force, would all work just as well against radar during the day as at night. Even by daylight, a bomber force would only be visible a few miles away – the range of radar was much greater and therefore the USAAF employed extensive radio countermeasures against them (not just chaff!)

    in reply to: Chief of Chaff dies #1567412
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Well, I have to say I’ve NEVER heard of Fred Whipple before …

    That’s not to say that he wasn’t the first to come up with the idea of chaff (or Window as we Brits called it then), but I do think that if he had been the first, I would probably have heard of the chap before. What I find interesting is no date is given for when he supposedly came up with the idea. Without some idea of timescale, it’s almost impossible to say whether or not he came first. I do have a lot of information on the work carried out by the Air Ministry Research Establishment on the development of Window, which I suspect probably came before the US work, but I can’t be certain. And, of course, the Germans were working on their version, Düppel, at roughly the same time.

    in reply to: Malta's Gladiator 'Faith' #1600812
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Dave T- I think you may well find that the Gladiator makes a move to MAM when the new hangar is established.

    Great! I thought that was to be the case, but wasn’t certain. It will be fantastic to have Faith fully restored sitting alongside the Hurricane and spitfire, and certainly much better than her current cramped conditions. Roll on the day! 🙂

    in reply to: Malta's Gladiator 'Faith' #1600843
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I personally would disagree. However, it’s too late to leave the airframe 100% original, since the current state comprises quite a bit of 1970s restoration.

    in reply to: Here's an Ebay auction to watch… #1600976
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Tell me about it!

    My eBay user name is Tizard, so you’ll know it’s me if you see that. It’s usually photos or other small items (which are cheap to post!) that I bid on, but having just bought ‘Those Other Eagles’ by Christopher Shores, I don’t have much cash for anything else. 🙁

    in reply to: Here's an Ebay auction to watch… #1601061
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I wonder if RadarArchive ( Ian ) is behind radarhist1 – looks like he bought a fair bit – if it is then its gone to a good home .

    Thanks for the compliment, but I wish I had the cash! :rolleyes:

    I did have a look at some of the items, but the cost of delivery would have been too steep for me (about £40) and I don’t have the money to pay the kinds of prices the items were fetching.

    Having said all this, if the items go to a good home where they are appreciated and, hopefully, are on public display, I’ll be more than happy. Even if it’s somewhere too far away for me to visit, it’s still better than seeing then skipped!

    in reply to: British can't tell Hollywood from history #1607599
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Please send me 100Kilos Of Hagus to eat.

    Scotland Forever

    Perhaps you should ask your Scottish relatives how to spell haggis? :p

    in reply to: Monica and Gee systems in Lancaster bombers #1609883
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Roughly the centre of the tailfin, on both sides.

    in reply to: Monica and Gee systems in Lancaster bombers #1610493
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I can confirm that Gee used a whip aerial on top of the fuselage, immediately behind the cockpit (at least was the location with Halifaxes and Lancasters). Monica used arrowhead aerials for transmission located underneath the turret, with the receiving aerial either side of the tailfin.

    in reply to: Monica and Gee systems in Lancaster bombers #1610867
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    I don’t know a lot about the aerial systems on the aircraft, but I can guarantee that Monica and Gee were two entirely separate systems. Monica operated on 1.5 metres, IIRC, whereas Gee operated on a much longer wavelength and only required a receiving aerial on the aircraft.

    I have a wartime colour trainign film for Monica III, which I’ve not watched for ages, but if you need more details about this equipment, let me know and I’ll have a look at the film and will hopefully be able to give you more specific information.

    in reply to: Here's an Ebay auction to watch… #1612204
    RadarArchive
    Participant

    Looks like someone is trying to do just that(tracer_adlam) I hope so!!

    I don’t know who tracer_adlam is, so I’m not going to criticise him. However (isn’t there always a ‘however’!), a look at some of his recent eBay feedback suggests to me that he trades in wartime aircraft spares. I guess that it’s more likely that, if the successful bidder, tracer_adlam won’t continue the build himself, but sell the items on to others for their projects.

    As I say, this may be a completely wrong assumption, and it’s possible tracer_adlam does want to complete this project himself. I’m just passing on my observations.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 898 total)