Ok – now point out the Nissan hut I stayed in as an Air Cadet on summer camp in, about, 1968!
– Pedantic Mode –
This wouldn’t be possible, because Nissan huts don’t exist. You want a Nissen hut, unless this is some new model of Japanese car that I don’t know about!
I just want to say a big thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread. I would never have identifed the location myself, but I knew someone here would be able to pin it down. Aynway, thanks everyone for a marvellous piece of research.
What I find quite interesting in all this is that the photos were taken on 26 July 1937. However, according to Action Stations Volume 1, Marham re-opened as a two-squadron heavy bomber station on 1 April 1937. Clearly, even three months after the station opened, it wasn’t ready for service occupation, but yet No 38 Squadron moved in at 0930 on 5 May 1937. I suspect they must have been relatively uncomfortable for a while!
Damien,
No problem. I just wasn’t sure how standardised pre-war expansion period aerodromes were but agree that these photos are clearly of Marham. Thanks very much for helping pin down the identity – much appreciated!
Definitely Marham:
Damien,
Thanks very much indeed for this. It looks pretty conclusive. Are you sure that none of the other possibles would be similar, ie is it possible that they were built to a standard layout and the buildings would therefore be in the same relative positions?
Would you be able to scan in larger copies of the photos, so we can see more detail, please?
Sadly, no. I don’t have a scanner. I have a whole pile of interesting photos that I’d like to post, but no way of doing so, for the meantime at least. When I do get a scanner, I’ll start putting some pics up.
I’ve just received the original prints in the post today. In the last of the four photos, the contractor’s lorry has a name on the side. This appears to read HANMANT and I wondered if anyone recognises this as a local building firm’s name. Perhaps it is a useful clue – or perhaps it is a useless piece of information!
… and the seller cannot shed any light on the origins?
Unfortunately not. 🙁
Radar: Where did the photos come from?
I’ve just bought them on eBay, so sadly I have no provenance as to where they originated from. I don’t yet have the originals – the images are the scans which were on the eBay page.
The one piece of information I am able to add, which may or may not be useful, is that the photos were taken on 26 July 1937. It’s probably of no help whatsoever in pinning things down, but you never know …
So that presumably would leave us with one of the following:
Dishforth…………..1936
Driffield…………….1936
Feltwell…………….1937
Finningley………….1936
Leconfield………….1936
Linton on Ouse…….1937
Marham…………….1937
Newton……………..1937
Stradishall………….1938
Waddington………..1916 (originally)
A quick search on abebooks.co.uk reveals that there is only one copy of Courage Alone: The Italian Air Force 1940-1943 for sale, from a bookshop in Pheonix, Arizona. Unfortunately, it is for sale at a price of $275, or £154.01, or €230.81! I don’t know how desperate you are for a copy of the book, but I suspect this is more than anyone is likely to pay for it.
If anyone is interested, I have a clip of film, courtesy of the Pathe Gazette website, showing Whirlwinds. The film is silent and is 4.31 MB in size, but I have broadband so if anyone is interested in seeing the clip, I’m happy to e-mail it to them. It open with Windows Media Player, so I think anyone should be able to play it without any problems.
If you’d like the clip, feel free to PM me with your e-mail address.
I think I’m right in saying that one fully reassembled, there is about 1 foot clearance between the hangar roof and the top of the tail. Since the hangar doors are much lower than the highest point of the roof, then clearly (as the photo indicates) there is no way Concorde is coming out without either her or the hangar losing bits of their anatomy!
Will she definitely be able to leave the hangar once all the bits are reattached ? I know there was some talk about this being difficult to say the least.
I don’t think there is any intention that she should leave the hangar once reassembled. She isn’t going to fly and would disintegrate very quickly if left outside in the elements, and they certainly aren’t going to wheel a large aircraft like that in and out all the time. So, as far as I know, once put back together the Concorde will remain in that hangar permanently (unless the museum manages to build a purpose-built building on newly-acquired land nearby).