Originally posted by Janie
B29 – Only aircraft to drop an atomic bomb in combat (1942)[/I][/COLOR]
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume this date is a typing error. 😉
Originally posted by John Cooper
Maybe it was an unauthorised flight like the erk, that ‘stole’ a Varsity from a RAF station in the UK flew south and crashed in France, killing himself.Just a thought
I’m pretty certain the details in my earlier post are the answer. I just need to check my notes this evening to be certain. I am, however, pretty certain that it wasn’t the type of scenario you suggest or I would recall the details clearly!
Originally posted by mike currill
Rememver that the Mosquito was never used as an interceptor though. More like a case of stooge around until something turns up then knockit down as in the night fighter role. This is exactly the scenarion envisioned for the F variant of the Tornado.
I never said it was an interceptor, though. The comment was that a ground attack aircraft can’t also be a good fighter.
Re: Tornado
Originally posted by duxfordhawk
you can hardly expect a ground attack aircraft to be a fighter.
Why not? It’s been done before. The Mosquito in particular comes to mind. It was a superb ground attack and anti-shipping aircraft with cannons and rockets, great bomber and superb heavy fighter. Multi-role aircraft are possible if you have a great design, which the Tornado is not!
I’m so envious, Moggy. Enjoy the opportunity, just don’t stick a parachute on him and make him jump out! 😉
I’ll need to check my records when I get home this evening, but I think Corporal Evans was killed when his Defiant, flying from No 60 OTU at East Fortune, crashed in the area. As such, it would suggest that he was a Corporal simply because he was still under training.
As I’ve said, I can’t be certain of the details at the mo, but it seems to fit the known facts.
Great photos, but its perfectly obvious that they are carefully staged photos of models, and not the real thing! Nice try!! 😉
Originally posted by coanda
research=profit loss.
Not necessarily. There are enough knowledgable people out there (such as on this forum) who are willing to provide information without charge that there is no excuse for such inaccuracies. It boils down to laziness on the part of Corgi staff, whom it would appear, can’t be bothered to try and get things correct. As long as it looks near enough right, it’ll do. Not at the prices they charge, though! For that money, I personally would want it 100% accurate!
I suspect (although can’t confirm for certain) that BLA = British Liberation Army.
I’ve checked all the books I have relating to SOE and I’m afraid this is the only reference of any kind I could find to any form of Apollo.
I don’t know if this is what you’re looking for, but M R D Foot in his official history, SOE in France, mentions that J B van Schelle was codenamed Apollo. His aircraft crash-landed east of Antwerp after an attack by a night fighter on its way to Holland in October [1943??]. I’ll check some of my other SOE books, since I suspect there must be another SOE Apollo, but I thought I’d post this just in case.
These photos sound very exciting. If you do manage to find the Arromanches ones, could you perhaps scan them and post them here (or somewhere else and post a link) so that we can see them?
Incidentally, Keele University owns the aerial reconnaissance archive from WW2 covering photography taken of occupied Europe and other areas, but not of the UK. If you can’t find the photos, it is possible there might be duplicates at Keele.
Fantastic photos! Thanks for sharing them. I love the Hawker group but I especially like the Tornado colour scheme. I never thought I’d like a Tornado – I see too many of them screaming up and down the glens round here – but this is a superb scheme and makes a great photo.
I don’t mean to offend, but didn’t we do this question a month or two back? I seem to recall posting on the subject of the best airshow I’d been to.
Having written a couple of small books myself, I would suggest that whatever you do write about has to be something that interests you. If not, it can be difficult to motivate yourself to sit and write. There’s no point in choosing the air war in the Far East if you’re only interested in the European theatre, for example.
My own preference would be for you to write something ‘different’. I always like to see new subjects covered which haven’t already been touched on. There’s little need for another non-fiction book on the Battle of Britain, for example, unless you do manage to find a fresh approach. :rolleyes:
From a personal point of view, I find non-fiction easier to write. Whether you write fiction or non-fiction, you still have to do the historical research to get your details correct, and the non-fiction at least cuts out the having to invent a storyline part!
Whatever you do choose to write, I look forward to reading it in due course.